全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

算法下的自我认知批判
Critique of Self-Consciousness under Algorithms

DOI: 10.12677/ACPP.2024.131026, PP. 164-172

Keywords: 自我认知,算法,技术批判,认知结构
Self-Consciousness
, Algorithm, Critique of Technology, Cognitive Structure

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

算法在人类社会中的融合,重塑了个体的自我认知。算法生成的“数据镜像”不仅改变了认知结构,而且引发了思维模式的变革。这种变革体现在算法在优化信息处理的同时,对复杂和多维问题的过度简化,算法追逐效率而忽视了经验认知的丰富性和情感的深度等问题上。随着技术逐渐替代原有的认知手段,带来了更多新的伦理挑战,特别是在道德决策和分析过程中过分依赖算法所引发的认知混乱和道德危机。对大数据时代中自我认知的现象进行批判,明确算法技术对认知透明性的影响和认知框架的侵入,对于重塑个体在算法环境中的自我认知至关重要。
The integration of big data and algorithms in human society has reshaped individual self-awareness. The “data mirror image” created by algorithms not only changes the cognitive structure but also triggers a revolution in thought patterns. This transformation is evident in the algorithm’s simplification of complex and multidimensional issues while optimizing information processing. The pursuit of efficiency in big data technology often overlooks the richness of experiential cognition and the depth of emotions. As technology emerges as a new means of self-awareness, it presents novel ethical challenges, particularly in the cognitive confusion and moral crises caused by an over-reliance on algorithms in moral decision-making and analysis. Critically examining the phenomenon of self-awareness in the era of big data, and clarifying the impact of technology on cognitive transparency and the intrusion of big data technologies on cognitive frameworks, is crucial for reshaping individual self-awareness in an algorithmic environment.

References

[1]  Eagleton, T. (2009) Trouble with Strangers: A Study of Ethics. Blackwell, Oxford, 1-347.
[2]  Kahl, S. and Kopp, S. (2023) Intertwining the Social and the Cognitive Loops: Socially Enactive Cognition for Human-Compatible Interactive Systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 378, 4-5.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0474
[3]  林曦, 郭苏建. 算法不正义与大数据伦理[J]. 社会科学文摘, 2020(9): 17-19.
[4]  王伯鲁. 技术困境及其超越[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2011: 51.
[5]  马丁?海德格尔. 存在与时间(修订译本) [M]. 陈嘉映, 王庆节, 译. 北京: 生活?读书?新知三联书店, 2014.
[6]  Gantz, J. and Re-insel, D. (2011) Extracting Value from Chaos. IDC iView, 1-12.
[7]  阿明?格伦瓦尔德. 技术伦理学手册[M]. 吴宁, 译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版, 2017.
[8]  Scimank, U. (1988) Scientific Associations in the German Research System: Knowledge in Society, p. 21.
[9]  黄欣荣. 大数据哲学研究的背景、现状与路径[J]. 哲学动态, 2015(7): 96-102.
[10]  计海庆. 关于虚拟世界扩展的伦理问题——翟振明教授访谈[J]. 哲学分析, 2010, 1(3): 160-165.
[11]  朱巧玲, 杨剑刚. 奴役或自由?——人的数字化发展的批判与反思[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2022(3): 18-31.
[12]  张云泉. 人工智能三驾马车: 大数据、算力和算法[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2012: 27.
[13]  李金鑫. 道德能力的道德哲学研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2011: 26.
[14]  林德宏. 技术对人的终极取代——人工智能技术的批判性思考[J]. 南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 23(4): 1-14.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133