全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

不同氮水平下大豆与玉米单、间作氮素吸收的微分方程建模
Differential Equation Modeling of Nitrogen Uptake in Soybean and Maize Monoculture and Intercropping under Different Nitrogen Levels

DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2024.131034, PP. 313-330

Keywords: 大豆/玉米间作,氮素吸收,非自治微分方程,最佳施氮量,氮利用率
Soybean/Maize Intercropping
, Nitrogen Uptake, Non-Autonomous Differential Equation, Optimal Nitrogen Application Rate, Nitrogen Utilization Rate

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

大豆/玉米间作具有一定的养分利用优势,但是不同氮水平下的间作体系对氮素吸收的响应不同。在本文中,首先分别建立了自然条件下大豆和玉米单作氮素吸收的非自治Logistic微分方程模型,探讨了不同氮水平下大豆和玉米单作时氮素吸收的非自治Logistic微分方程模型,得到单作大豆和玉米的最佳施氮量分别为0.4808 g?plant?1、2.6199 g?plant?1。然后,进一步建立了不同氮水平下大豆和玉米间作氮素吸收的二维非自治微分方程模型,对模型拟合的相关系数均在98%以上,数值计算得到间作大豆和玉米的最佳施氮量分别为0.4821 g?plant?1、2.6201 g?plant?1,与单作结果差别不大,然而,两作物的氮素吸收量在不同氮水平交叉种植模式下却有着显著差异。在最佳施氮量下,间作玉米的氮素吸收量最大为4.48 g?plant?1,较自然间作提升了59.43%,而大豆的氮素吸收量为1.31 g?plant?1,较自然间作也提升了32.32%;就氮肥利用率而言,最佳施氮量下间作大豆相比最佳单作大豆下降了24.01%,而最佳间作玉米相比最佳单作玉米则提高了30.45%。
Soybean/corn intercropping has certain advantages in nutrient utilization, but the response of in-tercropping systems to nitrogen uptake is different under different nitrogen levels. In this paper, non-autonomous Logistic differential equation models of nitrogen absorption of monoculture soy-bean and corn under natural conditions were established respectively, and non-autonomous Lo-gistic differential equation models of nitrogen absorption of soybean and corn under different ni-trogen levels were discussed at first. The optimal nitrogen application rates for the soybean and maize were 0.4808 g?plant?1 and 2.6199 g?plant?1, respectively. Then, a two-dimensional non-autonomous differential equation model was established further for the nitrogen uptake be-tween soybean and corn at different nitrogen levels. The correlation coefficients of the model were all above 98%. The optimal nitrogen application rates for intercropping soybean and corn were 0.4821 g?plant?1 and 2.6201 g?plant?1 respectively, which was no significant difference between the intercrops and monoculture results. However, the nitrogen uptake of the two crops was significantly different under different nitrogen levels of cross-cropping. Under the optimal nitrogen application rate, the maximum nitrogen uptake of intercropping maize was 4.48 g?plant?1, which was 59.43% higher than that of natural intercropping, while the nitrogen uptake of soybean was 1.31 g?plant?1, which was 32.32% higher than that of natural intercropping. In terms of the nitrogen utilization ra-tios, the best intercropping soybean decreased by 24.01% by comparing with the best monoculture soybean, while the best intercropping corn increased by 30.45% by comparing with the best mon-oculture corn.

References

[1]  王天亮, 程皓. 农业生产中的氮肥施用现状及其环境效应研究进展[J]. 黑龙江环境通报, 2020, 33(3): 58-59.
[2]  陈光荣, 王立明, 杨如萍, 等. 甘肃不同生态区豆科与非豆科间套作高效栽培技术及其应用前景[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(3): 63-71.
[3]  朱树秀, 季良, 阿米娜. 玉米单作及与大豆混作中氮来源的研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 1994(1): 59-61.
[4]  张晓娜, 陈平, 杜青, 等. 玉米/大豆、玉米/花生间作对作物氮素吸收及结瘤固氮的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(8): 1183-1194.
[5]  王林, 王琦, 李强, 等. 覆盖和粮草间作对作物氮素吸收利用和土壤硝态氮累积的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2014, 34(6): 1-9.
[6]  褚贵新, 沈其荣, 李奕林, 等. 用15N叶片标记法研究旱作水稻与花生间作系统中氮素的双向转移[J]. 生态学报, 2004(2): 278-284.
[7]  王雪蓉, 张润芝, 李淑敏, 等. 不同供氮水平下玉米/大豆间作体系干物质积累和氮素吸收动态模拟[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(9): 1354-1363.
[8]  姜启源, 谢金星, 叶俊. 数学模型[M]. 第4版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2011.
[9]  张林, 化存才, 强继业. 降低UV-B辐射对烤烟株高影响的非自治Logistic模型[J]. 生物数学学报, 2012, 27(4): 689-694.
[10]  梁仕军. 三种不同环境下花生生长发育的微分方程建模[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南师范大学, 2021.
[11]  段国梅. 大豆和玉米单、间作的氮养分吸收的微分方程建模[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南师范大学, 2023.
[12]  冯丽娟. 大豆需肥规律及科学施肥技术[J]. 现代化农业, 2019(1): 23-24.
[13]  王雪蓉. 施氮水平对玉米/大豆间作干物质累积和养分吸收的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2019.
[14]  李文斌. 声频控制对水稻分蘖期生长影响的微分方程建模[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南师范大学, 2019.
[15]  程雪琦, 陈宁远, 魏杰. 我国玉米进出口贸易的现状问题及对策[J]. 河北农业科学, 2023, 27(2): 100-103.
[16]  谢开云, 王玉祥, 万江春, 等. 混播草地中豆科/禾本科牧草氮转移机理及其影响因素[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 157-170.
[17]  Nourbakhsh, F., Koocheki, A. and Mahallati, M.N. (2019) Investigation of Biodiversity and Some of the Ecosystem Services in the Intercropping of Corn, Soybean and Marshmallow. International Journal of Plant Production, 13, 35-46.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-018-0032-0

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413