全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Design  2024 

基于认知负荷的老年人家用制氧机界面设计度量与优化
Measurement and Optimization of Interface Design for Elderly Household Oxygen Makers Based on Cognitive Load

DOI: 10.12677/Design.2024.91017, PP. 131-145

Keywords: 认知负荷,老年人,界面设计,家用制氧机
Cognitive Load
, Elderly People, Interface Design, Household Oxygen Concentrators

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:研究老年人使用家用制氧机过程中产生的认知负荷,展开制氧机界面中认知负荷的度量与实践研究。方法:通过厘清认知负荷概念,梳理认知负荷构成要素;从认知负荷构成要素出发,提出认知负荷度量的一级和二级指标,总结归纳度量方法和权重设定方法;研究老年人使用家用制氧机的任务流程、结合认知负荷度量指标对老年人家用制氧机进行成因分析;结合用户体验五要素对家用制氧机的进行设计改良并验证。结论:研究表明家用制氧机在界面的组织形式和表现形式缺乏一定合理性,导致老年人在进行任务操作时会产生注意分配失衡导致认知负荷过载,可通过合理组织与呈现界面信息的方法进行优化。家用制氧机界面设计中的认知负荷度量方法对认知负荷在老年用户产品界面的优化设计提供了创新路径,具有一定指导意义。
Objective: To study the cognitive load generated by elderly people during the use of household oxygen concentrators, and to conduct measurement and practical research on cognitive load in the interface of oxygen concentrators. Method: Clarify the concept of cognitive load and sort out the constituent elements of cognitive load; starting from the constituent elements of cognitive load, propose the first and second level indicators for measuring cognitive load, summarize and summarize the measurement methods and weight setting methods; study the task flow of elderly people using home oxygen concentrators, and analyze the causes of elderly people using home oxygen concentrators based on cognitive load measurement indicators; design improvement and validation of household oxygen concentrators based on the five elements of user experience. Conclusion: Research has shown that the organizational and presentation forms of household oxygen concentrators lack certain rationality in the interface, leading to imbalanced attention allocation and cognitive overload in elderly people during task operations. Optimization can be achieved through reasonable organization and presentation of interface information. The cognitive load measurement method in the interface design of household oxygen concentrators provides an innovative path for the optimization design of cognitive load in elderly user product interfaces, and has certain guiding significance.

References

[1]  白学军, 于晋, 覃丽珠, 杨海波. 认知老化与老年产品的交互界面设计[J]. 包装工程, 2020, 41(10): 7-12.
[2]  贺孝梅, 李剑钰. 人机交互中认知负荷的成因分析与设计策略研究[J]. 包装工程, 2020, 41(10): 24-30.
[3]  Sweller, J. (1988) Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
[4]  查先进, 黄程松, 严亚兰, 郭佳. 国外认知负荷理论应用研究进展[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(5): 547-556.
[5]  Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J.J.G. and Paas, F.G.W.C. (1998) Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
[6]  Sweller, J. (2010) Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extra-neous, and Germane Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123-138.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
[7]  张春玉. 基于认知负荷的通航飞机界面视觉编码设计研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 沈阳航空航天大学, 2020.
[8]  赵欣, 丁怡, 侯文军, 等. 复杂信息系统界面可用性指标体系研究[J]. 图学学报, 2018, 39(4): 716-722.
[9]  吕健, 孙玮伯, 潘伟杰, 等. 基于认知特性的信息界面布局美度评价[J]. 包装工程, 2019, 40(18): 220-226.
[10]  王俊生, 戴云龙. 基于序关系分析法的网络课程模糊综合评价模型[J]. 电化教育研究, 2009(11): 55-58.
[11]  徐泽水. 关于层次分析中几种标度的模拟评估[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2000(7): 58-62.
[12]  薛浩奇, 张昆. 基于认知负荷的老年人家用血糖仪优化设计研究[J]. 机电产品开发与创新, 2022, 35(3): 63-65+69.
[13]  孙崇勇, 刘电芝. 认知负荷主观评价量表比较[J]. 心理科学, 2013, 36(1): 194-201.
[14]  冉晓醒, 胡宏伟. 城乡差异、数字鸿沟与老年健康不平等[J]. 人口学刊, 2022, 44(3): 46-58.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413