全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

中国碳市场发展的减排效应及作用机制研究
Study on the Emission Reduction Effect and Role Mechanism of Carbon Market Development in China

DOI: 10.12677/JLCE.2024.131004, PP. 37-51

Keywords: 碳市场发展水平,碳减排效应,能源消费效率,能源消费结构
Carbon Market Development Level
, Carbon Emission Reduction Effect, Energy Consumption Efficiency, Energy Consumption Structure

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为了客观评价我国碳市场发展水平以及检验碳市场的发展是否能有效发挥碳减排效应,本文在考虑碳配额交易市场自身特征的基础上,将碳金融市场发展纳入碳市场发展评价体系,从多维度测度了我国碳市场发展水平。在此基础上,运用连续型双重差分法实证检验碳市场发展的碳减排效应和影响机制。研究表明,碳市场的发展能够有效实现碳减排效应,表现为碳市场的发展水平每提高1%,会使试点地区碳排放量和碳排放强度分别下降0.304%和0.345%。进一步的机制分析发现,能源消费效率提高和能源消费结构转型都是碳市场发展实现碳减排效应的有效途径,并且贡献分解结果表明,两种途径均在促进碳减排过程中发挥了较大的作用。
In order to objectively evaluate the development level of China’s carbon market and test whether the development of the carbon market can effectively play the carbon emission reduction effect, this paper, on the basis of considering the characteristics of the carbon quota trading market itself, incorporates the development of the carbon financial market into the evaluation system of carbon market development, and measures the level of development of China’s carbon market from a multi-dimensional perspective. On this basis, the continuous double difference method is used to empirically test the carbon emission reduction effect and influence mechanism of carbon market development. The study shows that the development of carbon market can effectively achieve the carbon emission reduction effect, which is manifested in the fact that every 1% increase in the development level of carbon market will lead to a decrease of 0.304% and 0.345% in carbon emission and carbon emission intensity in the pilot area, respectively. Further analysis of the mechanism reveals that improving the efficiency of energy consumption and transforming the energy consumption structure are both effective ways to achieve the carbon emission reduction effect of carbon market development, and the results of the contribution decomposition show that both ways play a greater role in promoting the process of carbon emission reduction.

References

[1]  吴茵茵, 齐杰, 鲜琴, 陈建东. 中国碳市场的碳减排效应研究——基于市场机制与行政干预的协同作用视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(8): 114-132.
[2]  Tong, J., Yue, T. and Xue, J. (2022) Carbon Taxes and a Guidance-Oriented Green Finance Approach in China: Path to Carbon Peak. Journal of Cleaner Production, 367, Article 133050.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133050
[3]  张希良, 张达, 余润心. 中国特色全国碳市场设计理论与实践[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(8): 80-95.
[4]  Guo, L.Y. and Feng, C. (2021) Are There Spillovers among China’s Pilots for Carbon Emission Allowances Trading? Energy Economics, 103, Article 105574.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105574
[5]  廖文龙, 董新凯, 翁鸣, 陈晓毅. 市场型环境规制的经济效应:碳排放交易、绿色创新与绿色经济增长[J]. 中国软科学, 2020(6): 159-173.
[6]  Shi, B., Li, N., Gao, Q., et al. (2022) Market Incentives, Carbon Quota Allocation and Carbon Emission Reduction: Evidence from China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy. Journal of Environmental Management, 319, Article 115650.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115650
[7]  张婕, 王凯琪, 张云. 碳排放权交易机制的减排效果——基于低碳技术创新的中介效应[J]. 软科学, 2022, 36(5): 102-108.
[8]  李响, 张楠, 宋培. 碳排放交易制度的节能减排效应及作用机制研究——基于合成控制法的经验证据[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2022, 42(4): 96-113.
[9]  Chen, S., Shi, A. and Wang, X. (2020) Carbon Emission Curbing Effects and Influencing Mechanisms of China’s Emission Trading Scheme: The Mediating Roles of Technique Effect, Composition Effect and Allocation Effect. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, Article 121700.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121700
[10]  白雪洁, 宋培, 王宝璐. 碳排放交易制度的节能减排路径: 效率提升还是结构转型?——来自中国省级数据的准自然实验[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2021(8): 70-85.
[11]  Wang, X., Huang, J. and Liu, H. (2022) Can China’s Carbon Trading Pol-icy Help Achieve Carbon Neutrality?—A Study of Policy Effects from the Five-Sphere Integrated Plan Perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 305, Article 114357.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114357
[12]  曾诗鸿, 李璠, 翁智雄, 钟震. 我国碳交易试点政策的减排效应及地区差异[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(4): 1922-1933.
[13]  刘传明, 孙喆, 张瑾. 中国碳排放权交易试点的碳减排政策效应研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(11): 49-58.
[14]  Melitz, M.J. (2003) The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate In-dustry Productivity. Econometrica, 71, 1695-1725.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
[15]  董直庆, 王辉. 市场型环境规制政策有效性检验——来自碳排放权交易政策视角的经验证据[J]. 统计研究, 2021, 38(10): 48-61.
[16]  柳亚琴, 孙薇, 朱治双. 碳市场对能源结构低碳转型的影响及作用路径[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(9): 4369-4379.
[17]  陈智颖, 许林, 钱崇秀. 中国碳金融发展水平测度及其动态演化[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2020, 37(8): 62-82.
[18]  郭峰, 王靖一, 王芳, 孔涛, 张勋, 程志云. 测度中国数字普惠金融发展: 指数编制与空间特征[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2020, 19(4): 1401-1418.
[19]  Nunn, N. and Qian, N. (2011) The Potato’S Contribution to Population and Urbanization: Evidence from a Historical Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 593-650.
https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr009
[20]  Shan, Y., Guan, D., Zheng, H., et al. (2018) China CO2 Emission Accounts 1997-2015. Scientific Data, 5, 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.201
[21]  Chen, J., Gao, M., Cheng, S., et al. (2020) County-Level CO2 Emis-sions and Sequestration in China during 1997-2017. Scientific Data, 7, Article 391.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00736-3
[22]  宋弘, 孙雅洁, 陈登科. 政府空气污染治理效应评估——来自中国“低碳城市”建设的经验研究[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(6): 95-108+195.
[23]  Taylor, A.B., MacKinnon, D.P. and Tein, J.Y. (2008) Tests of the Three-Path Mediated Effect. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 241-269.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300344

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413