全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A Comparative Study of Mandibular Fractures in Senegal: Children vs. Adults

DOI: 10.4236/ojst.2024.142007, PP. 72-76

Keywords: Fracture, Mandible, Child, Adult

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Introduction: The commonest maxillofacial fractures involve the mandible. Age can be considered among influential factors. Aim of the Study: To compare mandibular fractures between children and adults from the beginning up to the treatment in Senegal. Patients and Method: A three-year retrospective study was conducted in a university hospital. The medical records of patients admitted for maxillofacial injuries were reviewed. Patient and injury-related variables including age, gender, etiology, average consultation delay, anatomic location of fracture and treatment were compared up to age of 15 and beyond that. Results: Considering 272 casualties, maxillofacial fractures were less frequent among children than adults (36.7% and 59.7%) and were mainly mandibular (90.1% and 91.4%). Male predilection (sex ratio of 2.4 and 4.9) was twice (2) as pronounced from the age of 16. The average consultation delay was two (2) times shorter for children. Road traffic accidents which predominated among children (33.9%) had comparable frequency (32.3%) although they were outnumbered by assault (37.6%) among adults. Fractures occurred mainly on the corpus (90.1% and 90.4%), particularly on parasymphysis (40.1%) up to the age of 15, whereas angle fractures increased (8.5% to 19.6%) and joint damage decreased afterwards. Intra-oral orthopedic procedures (91.2% and 92.6%) in which mandibular retention splints were more common (37.3%) up to the age of 15 then arch ligatures (49%) were then widely favored. Conclusion: Differences relating to the distribution of causes but also to the anatomic location on the corpus and to the choice of intra-oral orthopedic procedures within overall similarities between children and adults regarding the male predilection, the frequency of road traffic accidents, the mandibular injuries, but also the school therapeutic attitude consisting of favoring the orthopedic option.

References

[1]  OMS and Regional Committee for Africa (2016) Regional Oral Health Strategy 2016-2025: Adressing Oral Health Diseases as Part of Noncommunicable Diseases.
https://www.afro.who.int/sites/default/files/sessions/working_documents/afr-rc66-5-fr-3110_0.pdf
[2]  Lin, F.Y., Wu, C.I. and Cheng, H.T. (2017) Mandibular Fracture Patterns at a Medical Center in Central Taiwan Region: A 3-Year Epidemiological Review. Medicine (Baltimore), 96, e9333.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009333
[3]  Boffano, P., et al. (2015) European Maxillofacial Trauma (EURMAT) Project: A Multicentre and Prospective Study. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 43, 62-70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.10.011
[4]  Afrooz, P.N., Bykowski, M.R., James, I.B., Daniali, L.N. and Clavijo-Alvarez, J.A. (2015) The Epidemiology of Mandibular Fractures in the United States, Part 1: A Review of 13,142 Cases from the US National Trauma Data Bank. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 73, 2361-2366.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.04.032
[5]  Gualtieri, M., Pisapia, F., Fadda, M.T., Priore, P. and Valentini, V. (2021) Mandibular Fractures Epidemiology and Treatment Plans in the Center of Italy: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 32, e346-e349.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007118
[6]  Hassanein, A.G. (2021) Trends and Outcomes of Management of Mandibular Fractures. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 32, e90-e92.
[7]  Ma, Y., Hao, X. and Zhao, Y. (2021) Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Strategy for Treatment of Comminuted Mandibular Fracture. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 32, e90-e92.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006778

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413