全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Evaluation Method of Information Dissemination Efficiency within Professional Virtual Community: Based on Chinese College and University Students

DOI: 10.4236/ajc.2024.121005, PP. 92-107

Keywords: Professional Virtual Community, Information Dissemination, Efficiency Evaluation, Chinese College and University Students, EWM, TOPSIS

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The professional virtual community is a unique form of network social communication with the development of the Internet and new media technology. It is a network aggregation space formed by the combination of network user groups for some specific reasons. The professional virtual community, which is characterized by virtual social interaction, thematic concentration, free expression and exclusive environment, has become the main medium for Chinese college and university students to interact online. Different from ordinary Internet users, college and university students prefer to communicate with professional virtual communities and are more easily guided by information from virtual communities. Exploring the evaluation method of information dissemination efficiency is helpful in comparing the difficulty of information publishing and receiving among different professional virtual communities, and to formulate reasonable media operation strategies. At the same time, it can also help college and university administrators better understand students’ online social behaviors and provide more targeted services. Based on the characteristics of professional virtual community information dissemination, this paper designs an evaluation index system from static and dynamic dimensions. In order to facilitate comparison, a 5-point scale is used to design the evaluation criteria for all indicators. EWM is used to generate objective weights of indicators, and TOPSIS is used to realize comprehensive evaluation and efficiency ranking. Finally, eight professional virtual communities commonly used by Chinese college and university students are used as examples to measure the effectiveness of the evaluation method.

References

[1]  Alemany, J., Val Elena, D., & Garcıa-Fornes, A. M. (2021). “Who Should I Grant Access to My Post?”: Identifying the Most Suitable Privacy Decisions on Online Social Networks. Internet Research, 31, 1290-1317.
https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2020-0128
[2]  Assimakopoulos, C., Antoniadis, I., Kayas, O. G., & Dvizac, D. (2017). Effective Social Media Marketing Strategy: Facebook as an Opportunity for Universities. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45, 532-549.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-11-2016-0211
[3]  Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A State-of-the-Art Survey of TOPSIS Applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 13051-13069.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
[4]  Chen, I. Y. L. (2007). The Factors Influencing Members’ Continuance Intentions in Professional Virtual Communities—A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Information Science, 33, 451-467.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506075323
[5]  Chiu, C. M., Wang, E. T. G., Shih, F. J., & Fan, Y. W. (2011). Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities: An Integration of Expectancy Disconfirmation and Justice Theories. Online Information Review, 35, 134-153.
https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521111113623
[6]  Ciardiello, F., & Genovese, A. (2023). A Comparison between TOPSIS and SAW Methods. Annals of Operations Research, 325, 967-994.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05339-w
[7]  CNNIC. (2023). The 51st Statistical Report on China’s Internet Development, China Internet Network Information Centre.
[8]  Deng, X., & Guo, K. (2021). Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities: A Network Perspective. Library Hi Tech, 39, 1174-1186.
https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-09-2018-0119
[9]  Dong, Q. J., Ai, X. S., Cao, G. J., Zhang, Y. M., & Wang, X. J. (2010). Study on Risk Assessment of Water Security of Drought Periods Based on Entropy Weight Methods. Kybernetes, 39, 864-870.
https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921011046627
[10]  Florenthal, B. (2015). Applying Uses and Gratifications Theory to Students’ LinkedIn Usage. Young Consumers, 16, 17-35.
https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-12-2013-00416
[11]  Giddens, J., Hrabe, D., Carlson-Sabelli, L., Fogg, L., & North, S. (2012). The Impact of a Virtual Community on Student Engagement and Academic Performance among Baccalaureate Nursing Students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 28, 284-290.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.04.011
[12]  Hadija, Z., Barnes, S. B., & Hair, N. (2012). Why We Ignore Social Networking Advertising. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 15, 19-32.
https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751211191973
[13]  Hung, S. Y., Lai, H. M., & Chou, Y. C. (2015). Knowledge-Sharing Intention in Professional Virtual Communities: A Comparison between Posters and Lurkers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 2494-2510.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23339
[14]  Jozani, M., Ayburi, E., Ko, M., & Choo, K. K. R. (2020). Privacy Concerns and Benefits of Engagement with Social Media-Enabled Apps: A Privacy Calculus Perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, Article 106260.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106260
[15]  Kang, H. J., Han, J., & Kwon, G. H. (2019). An Integrated Success Factor Model of Professional Virtual Communities: Incorporation of the Operators, Members, and Life Cycle Perspectives. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35, 1312-1330.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1519977
[16]  Kayode, B. K., Zamzami, I. F., & Olowolayemo, A. (2012). Students’ Orientation towards Interpersonal Communication in Online Social Networking Sites. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 6, 36-44.
https://doi.org/10.1108/17504971211216300
[17]  Kim, J., Kim, H., & Kim, M. (2021). The Impact of a Sense of Virtual Community on Online Community: Does Online Privacy Concern Matter? Internet Research, 31, 519-539.
https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-01-2020-0015
[18]  Kim, J., Lee, C., & Elias, T. (2015). Factors Affecting Information Sharing in Social Networking Sites amongst University Students: Application of the Knowledge-Sharing Model to Social Networking Sites. Online Information Review, 39, 290-309.
https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2015-0022
[19]  Lai, H. M., Chen, C. P., & Chang, Y. F. (2014). Determinants of Knowledge Seeking in Professional Virtual Communities. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33, 522-535.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.864709
[20]  Li, Z., Luo, Z. J., Wang, Y., Fan, G. Y., & Zhang, J. M. (2022). Suitability Evaluation System for the Shallow Geothermal Energy Implementation in Region by Entropy Weight Method and TOPSIS Method. Renewable Energy, 184, 564-576.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.112
[21]  Lopez, M., Sicilia, M., & Verlegh, P. W. J. (2022). How to Motivate Opinion Leaders to Spread E-WoM on Social Media: Monetary vs Non-monetary Incentives. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16, 154-171.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-03-2020-0059
[22]  Mathew, M., Chakrabortty, R. K., & Ryan, M. J. (2022). Selection of an Optimal Maintenance Strategy under Uncertain Conditions: An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Method. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69, 1121-1134.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2977141
[23]  McConnell, T. J., Parker, J. M., Eberhardt, J., Koehler, M. J., & Lundeberg, M. A. (2013). Virtual Professional Learning Communities: Teachers’ Perceptions of Virtual versus Face-to-Face Professional Development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 267-277.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9391-y
[24]  Pan, W., & Lan, X. Y. (2009). Building a Virtual Community Platform for Subject Information Services at Shanghai Jiao Tong University Library. The Electronic Library, 27, 271-282.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470910947610
[25]  Qutab, S., Iqbal, A., Ullah, F. S., Siddique, N., & Khan, M. (2022). Role of Virtual Communities of Practice (VCoP) in Continuous Professional Development of Librarians: A Case of Yahoo Mailing Group from Pakistan. Library Management, 43, 317-333.
https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-02-2021-0017
[26]  Ren, Y. Q., Harper, F. M., Drenner, S., Terveen, L., Kiesler, S., Riedl, J., & Kraut, R. E. (2012). Building Member Attachment in Online Communities: Applying Theories of Group Identity and Interpersonal Bonds. MIS Quarterly, 36, 841-864.
https://doi.org/10.2307/41703483
[27]  Sankaran, K., & Demangeot, C. (2017). Conceptualizing Virtual Communities as Enablers of Community-Based Entrepreneurship and Resilience. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 11, 78-94.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-02-2015-0017
[28]  Smith, T., & Lambert, R. (2014). A Systematic Review Investigating the Use of Twitter and Facebook in University-Based Healthcare Education. Health Education, 114, 347-366.
https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-07-2013-0030
[29]  Sullivan, R., Tysick, C. A., Pilawski, B., Strause, S. S., Van-Putten, C., & Whitley-Grassi, N. (2014). Tools of Engagement Project (TOEP): Online Professional Development through Structured Inquiry and a Virtual Community. Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, 1, 377-392.
https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120140000001019
[30]  Tajvidi, M., Richard, M., Wang, Y. C., & Hajli, N. (2020). Brand Co-Creation through Social Commerce Information Sharing: The Role of Social Media. Journal of Business Research, 121, 476-486.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.008
[31]  Tamjidyamcholo, A., Baba, M. S. B., Shuib, N. L. M., & Rohani, V. A. (2014). Evaluation Model for Knowledge Sharing in Information Security Professional Virtual Community. Computers & Security, 43, 19-34.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2014.02.010
[32]  Tamjidyamcholo, A., Kumar, S., Sulaiman, A., & Gholipour, R. (2016). Willingness of Members to Participate in Professional Virtual Communities. Quality & Quantity, 50, 2515-2534.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0274-1
[33]  Trehan, D., & Sharma, R. (2020). What Motivates Members to Transact on Social C2C Communities? A Theoretical Explanation. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37, 399-411.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-04-2019-3174
[34]  Tsang, H. W. C., & Tsui, E. (2017). Conceptual Design and Empirical Study of a Personal Learning Environment and Network (PLE&N) to Support Peer-Based Social and Lifelong Learning. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 47, 228-249.
https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-03-2017-0010
[35]  Vătămănescu, E., Andrei, A. G., & Pînzaru, F. (2018). Investigating the Online Social Network Development through the Five Cs Model of Similarity. Information Technology & People, 31, 84-109.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-06-2016-0135
[36]  Wang, J., Zhang, R.L., Hao, J. X., & Chen, X. Y. (2019). Motivation Factors of Knowledge Collaboration in Virtual Communities of Practice: A Perspective from System Dynamics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23, 466-488.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2018-0061
[37]  Wu, X., Zhang, C., & Yang, L. J. (2021). Evaluation and Selection of Transportation Service Provider by TOPSIS Method with Entropy Weight. Thermal Science, 25, 1483-1488.
https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI200301050W
[38]  Ye, P. H., & Liu, L. Q. (2022). Factors Influencing College Students’ Behaviours of Spreading Internet Public Opinions on Emergencies in Universities. Information Discovery and Delivery, 50, 75-86.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-10-2020-0126
[39]  Yu, B. H., & Leung, Y. W. (2023). Establishing Ties or Strengthening Friendships? Students’ Use of Online Social Networks in Intercultural Friendship Development. Information Technology & People.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2022-0035
[40]  Zavadskas, E. K., Mardani, A., Turskis, Z., Jusoh, A., & Nor, K. M. (2016). Development of TOPSIS Method to Solve Complicated Decision-Making Problems—An Overview on Developments from 2000 to 2015. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15, 645-682.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622016300019
[41]  Zhi, H. W., & Zhang, D. P. (2022). Effects of Professional Virtual Community Attributes and Flow Experience on Information Sharing Among Chinese Young Netizens: A Fuzzy-Set QCA. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 3497-3511.
https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S387166
[42]  Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2017). A Bibliometric-Based Survey on AHP and TOPSIS Techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 78, 158-181.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.016

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413