全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于LSSC的商业银行资产负债组合优化模型研究
An Optimization Model of Asset-Liability Portfolio of Commercial Banks Based on LSSC Model

DOI: 10.12677/ORF.2024.141010, PP. 103-117

Keywords: 商业银行,资产负债管理,利率风险免疫
Commercial Banks
, Asset-Liability Management, Interest Rate Risk Immunity

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

利率市场化后,灵活的市场调控要求商业银行加快提升经营管理水平,在实现利润增长的同时防范风险,优化资金配置。根据我国借贷市场短期收益率波动大于长期的特点,对动态Nelson-Siegel模型引入第二个斜率因子,扩展至LSSC模型,并且将构成LSSC模型的4个维度因子参数引入DNS久期向量,推导出LSSC模型的久期向量,构造以银行月收益最大化为目标、4个维度零久期缺口,以流动性约束为条件的资产负债组合优化模型。实证结果表明:相比于传统Nelson-Siegel模型,改进的LSSC模型近端拟合效果具有明显优势,计算得出的短期利率预测误差较小,并且通过实例应用发现基于LSSC模型实现资产负债组合优化更能有效抵御利率风险。
After the marketization of interest rates, the flexible market regulation requires commercial banks to accelerate the improvement of operation and management, to prevent risks and optimize the allocation of funds while achieving profit growth. According to the characteristics of China’s lending market where short-term yield fluctuations are greater than long-term ones, a second slope factor is introduced to the dynamic Nelson-Siegel model and extended to the LSSC model, and the parameters of the four dimensional factors constituting the LSSC model are introduced into the DNS duration vector, which is derived to construct a duration vector of the LSSC model, which takes the maximisation of the bank’s monthly return as the goal, has a zero duration gap in the four dimensions and an asset-liability portfolio optimisation model conditional on liquidity constraints. The empirical results show that compared with the traditional Nelson-Siegel model, the improved LSSC model has an obvious advantage in its proximal fitting effect, the short-term interest rate prediction error is smaller, and it is found that the optimization of asset-liability portfolios based on the LSSC model is more effective against interest rate risk through the application of examples.

References

[1]  Thore, C.S. (1966) Planning for Liquidity in Financial Institutions: The Chance-Constrained Method. Journal of Finance, 21, 649-674.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1966.tb00272.x
[2]  Wolf, C.R. (2001) A Model for Selecting Commercial Bank Government Security Portfolios. Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 40-52.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1926946
[3]  冯宝军, 闫达文, 迟国泰. 基于非线性区间数风险控制的资产负债优化模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(1): 79-90.
[4]  周颖, 柳煦. 基于多组最优解的银行资产负债多目标优化模型构建[J]. 管理评论, 2018, 30(6): 13-27.
[5]  Chambers, D. and Charnes, A. (1961) Inter-Temporal Analysis and Optimization of Bank Portfolios. Management Science, 7, 393-410.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.7.4.393
[6]  Booth, G.G. and Dash, G.H. (1979) Alternate Programming Struc-tures for Bank Portfolios. Journal of Banking & Finance, 3, 67-82.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(79)90006-2
[7]  Wetmore, J.L.T. and Brick, J.R. (1990) Interest Rate Risk and the Optimal Gap for Commercial Banks: An Empirical Study. Financial Review, 25, 539-557.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.1990.tb01297.x
[8]  Gjerde, ?. And Semmen, K. (1995) Risk-Based Capital Requirements and Bank Portfolio Risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 19, 1159-1173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(94)00077-G
[9]  迟国泰, 闫达文. 基于VaR控制预留缺口的资产负债管理优化模型[J]. 管理工程学报, 2011, 25(3): 123-132.
[10]  吴灏文, 迟国泰. 基于方向久期与凸度免疫的资产负债优化模型[J]. 系统工程学报, 2012, 27(4): 506-512.
[11]  彭建刚, 张倚胜, 刘凡璠. 基于监管协调创新的银行资产负债比例管理的改进[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 30(4): 72-78.
[12]  王晓婷, 沈沛龙. 基于资本的商业银行系统流动性风险管理研究[J]. 当代经济研究, 2017(10): 71-80.
[13]  李鸿禧, 迟国泰. 基于违约强度信用久期的资产负债优化模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(6): 1387-1403.
[14]  周颖, 吴琼. 基于动态利率风险免疫的银行资产负债优化模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(4): 118-129.
[15]  迟国泰, 张志鹏, 刘艳. 基于随机久期缺口控制的全资产负债优化模型[J]. 管理工程学报, 2020, 34(3): 199-213.
[16]  Nelson, C. and Siegel, A.F. (1987) Parsimonious Modeling of Yield Curves. The Journal of Business, 60, 473-489.
https://doi.org/10.1086/296409
[17]  张继强. 债券利率风险管理的三因素模型[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2004, 21(1): 62-67.
[18]  王志强, 张姣. 久期配比策略的免疫性分析——来自中国国债市场的经验证据[J]. 财经问题研究, 2009(11): 48-55.
[19]  余文龙, 王安兴. 基于动态Nelson-Siegel模型的国债管理策略分析[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2010, 9(4): 1403-1426.
[20]  杨婉茜, 成力为. 基于Nelson-Siegel模型控制利率风险的资产负债组合优化模型[J]. 系统工程, 2014, 32(2): 12-20.
[21]  周颖, 杨洁. 基于“四维久期”利率风险免疫的资产负债组合优化模型[J]. 系统管理学报, 2019, 28(1): 86-97.
[22]  沈根祥, 陈映洲. 双斜率因子动态Nelson-Siegel利率期限结构模型及其应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(10): 1-10.
[23]  文忠桥. 中国银行间国债市场利率期限结构实证分析——基于Nelson-Siegel模型[J]. 财贸研究, 2013, 24(3): 124-129.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413