全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

绿色税制是否能促进重污染企业转型升级?——基于“环保费改税”的经验证据
Can a Green Tax System Promote the Transformation and Upgrading of Heavily Polluting Enterprises?—Empirical Evidence Based on “Environmental Protection Fees to Taxes”

DOI: 10.12677/ORF.2024.141011, PP. 118-130

Keywords: 绿色税制,环境保护税,企业转型升级
Green Tax System
, Environmental Protection Tax, Enterprise Transformation and Upgrading

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为践行人与自然和谐共生理念,促进绿色低碳经济建设。以“环保费改税”的实施为准自然实验,基于2012~2021年沪深A股上市企业的微观数据,构建双重差分模型探究绿色税制对重污染企业转型升级的促进作用。研究结果表明,“环保费改税”政策对于重污染企业转型升级具有显著的促进作用,该结论在经过一系列稳健性检验后依然成立。机制检验结果表明,“环保费改税”对重污染企业转型升级通过提高企业管理水平发挥政策效应,对企业研发投入并无显著影响。异质性分析表明,非国有企业转型升级受到“环保费改税”政策的显著影响,而这一结果在国有企业中并不显著;相较于东部地区,处于西部地区的重污染企业在政策的影响下呈现更高的转型升级积极性。
In order to practice the concept of harmonious coexistence of man and nature and promote the construction of green low-carbon economy, taking the implementation of “environmental protection fee to tax” as a quasi-natural experiment, based on the micro data of A-share listed enterprises in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2012 to 2021, this paper constructed a DID model to investigate the promotion effect of green tax system on the transformation and upgrading of heavily polluting enterprises. The results of the study show that the policy of “environmental fee to tax” has a significant role in promoting the transformation and upgrading of heavy polluting enterprises. This conclusion still holds after a series of robustness tests. The policy effect of “changing environmental protection fee to tax” on the transformation and upgrading of heavy polluting enterprises is exerted through improving the management level of enterprises, but it has no significant effect on the R&D investment of enterprises. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the transformation and upgrading of non-state-owned enterprises is significantly affected by the policy of “environmental protection fee to tax”, while this result is not significant in state-owned enterprises; compared with the eastern region, the heavy polluting enterprises in the western region show higher transformation and upgrading enthusiasm under the influence of the policy.

References

[1]  齐绍洲, 林磆, 崔静波. 环境权益交易市场能否诱发绿色创新?——基于我国上市公司绿色专利数据的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(12): 129-143.
[2]  斯丽娟, 曹昊煜. 排污权交易制度下污染减排与工业发展测度研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2021, 38(6): 107-128.
[3]  Pal, R. and Saha, B. (2015) Pollution Tax, Partial Privatization and Environment. Resource and Energy Economics, 40, 19-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.01.004
[4]  王树强, 范振鹏. 环保收费制度改进对企业绿色创新效果的影响研究——基于环保费改税的准自然实验[J]. 工业技术经济, 2021, 40(8): 31-39.
[5]  Orlov, A. and Grethe, H. (2012) Carbon Taxation and Market Structure: ACGE Analysis for Russia. Energy Policy, 51, 696-707.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.012
[6]  孔东民, 韦咏曦, 季绵绵. 环保费改税对企业绿色信息披露的影响研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2021(8): 2-14.
[7]  田利辉, 关欣, 李政, 等. 环境保护税费改革与企业环保投资——基于《环境保护税法》实施的准自然实验[J]. 财经研究, 2022, 48(9): 32-46, 62.
[8]  王科唯, 武亚兴. 绿色税制对稀土企业全要素生产率促进作用研究——基于资源税改革的实证分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2023(3): 116-119, 205.
[9]  赵海益. “双碳”目标下的资源税改革研究[J]. 税务研究, 2022(9): 64-68.
[10]  文传浩, 林彩云. 环保税能否给长江经济带带来双重红利效应? ——兼论流域环保税税制改革[J]. 南通大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 38(5): 48-62.
[11]  刘晔, 黄实, 黄张妍. 水资源税改革能实现双重红利效应吗? [J]. 税务研究, 2022(9): 55-63.
[12]  于连超, 张卫国, 毕茜. 环境保护费改税促进了重污染企业绿色转型吗?——来自《环境保护税法》实施的准自然实验证据[J]. 中国人口?资源与环境, 2021, 31(5): 109-118.
[13]  于连超, 张卫国, 毕茜. 环境税对企业绿色转型的倒逼效应研究[J]. 中国人口?资源与环境, 2019, 29(7): 112-120.
[14]  Porter, M.E. and Vander, L.C. (1995) Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97-118.
https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
[15]  Porter, M.E. (1996) America’s Green Strategy. In: Schlottmann, C., et al., Eds., Business and the Environment: A Reader, New York University Press, Manhattan, 1072.
[16]  于连超, 耿弘基, 毕茜. 绿色税制改革对企业环境绩效的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2023, 20(6): 916-924.
[17]  温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745
[18]  仇蕾, 马蓓文, 周钦, 等. 环境规制对重污染企业投资偏好的影响——基于我国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(3): 92-106.
[19]  程虹, 刘三江, 罗连发. 中国企业转型升级的基本状况与路径选择——基于570家企业4794名员工入企调查数据的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2016(2): 57-70.
[20]  李永友, 严岑. 服务业“营改增”能带动制造业升级吗? [J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(4): 18-31.
[21]  Levinsohn, J. and Petrin, A. (2003) Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies, 70, 317-341.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00246
[22]  钱雪松, 康瑾, 唐英伦, 等. 产业政策、资本配置效率与企业全要素生产率——基于中国2009年十大产业振兴规划自然实验的经验研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(8): 42-59.
[23]  李林木, 汪冲. 税费负担、创新能力与企业升级——来自“新三板”挂牌公司的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(11): 119-134.
[24]  刘和旺, 李泱泱, 郑世林. 碳排放交易试点对企业转型升级的影响[J]. 产业经济评论, 2020(6): 86-104.
[25]  慕亚宇, 胡奕明. 实体企业金融资产配置对企业转型升级的影响[J]. 当代经济科学, 2022, 44(5): 113-126.
[26]  张建清, 龚恩泽, 孙元元. 长江经济带环境规制与制造业全要素生产率[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(9): 1558-1569.
[27]  曹越, 唐奕可, 辛红霞. “环保费改税”提高了重污染企业全要素生产率吗? [J]. 审计与经济研究, 2022, 37(5): 95-106.
[28]  Zhang, Y., Zhao, X. and Fu, B. (2022) Impact of Energy Saving on the Financial Performance of Industrial Enterprises in China: An Empirical Analysis Based on Propensity Score Matching. Journal of Environmental Management, 317, Article ID: 115377.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115377
[29]  方兰, 汤鹤延. 碳排放权交易对企业碳减排的效应——基于中国上市公司数据的准自然实验方法分析[J]. 陕西师范大学学报, 2022, 51(5): 14-29.
[30]  Liu, Q. and Lu, Y. (2015) Firm Investment and Exporting: Evidence from China’s Value-Added Tax Reform. Journal of Interna-tional Economics, 97, 392-403.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.07.003
[31]  龚关, 胡关亮, 陈磊. 国有与非国有制造业全要素生产率差异分析——基于资源配置效率与平均生产率[J]. 产业经济研究, 2015(1): 93-100.
[32]  林小莉, 王德起. 智慧城市建设能促进绿色发展吗?——基于“准自然实验”的证据[J]. 技术经济, 2022, 41(11): 104-113.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413