全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Decision Support System in Determination Risk Management System Model in State Universities Public Service Agency
—Case Study at the Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta

DOI: 10.4236/jfrm.2024.131006, PP. 130-148

Keywords: SU PSA, Risk, Risk Management, Risk Management Process, Risk Management Structure, Risk Management Procedures

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This research would discuss as well as showcase a design of a risk management system that are applicable to State University Public Service Agency (SU PSA or PTN BLU) (Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Badan Layanan Umum/PTN BLU) with a case study at the Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta (UPNYK). This study would utilize a descriptive qualitative method alongside a case study at UPNYK. With using interviews and documentation as the data collection method, the research that would interpret and analyze a more appropriate design of risk management system that should be implemented by UPNYK. Data was analyzed with a method of: data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion verification. The study reveals that risk management at UPNYK was found operational, although it has yet to be delivered in a comprehensive and methodical manner. Therefore, UPNYK needs to establish a sound and comprehensive risk management system which encompasses its organizational elements, functions, and methods. One of the implementation of risk management would be using a control model of three level stratification, in which Audit Committee (AC or KA) would be responsible for the policy level, a Chancellor with assistance from the Internal Monitoring Unit (Satuan Pengawas Intern/SPI) that would coordinate the operational level, and the Quality Assurance Committee (QAC or KJM) functions as the organizer for the work unit’s efforts. Using this system, the Audit Committee would be in charge on supervising the implementation of the system. The process would be done in accordance with the Australian New Zealand International Standard (AS/NZS ISO) 31,000:2009 standards which consist of the process of establishing context, risk identification, risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk handling, review, communication, and consultation. Risk management processes will be compiled with respect to the UPNYK’s objective period which may consist of a five and one year period as well a specific time period.

References

[1]  AH Cebba. (2020). Design of Risk Mapping in State Universities with Public Service Agency Financial Management (SU PSA-FM or PTN PK-BLU) in Indonesia.
[2]  Ariff, M. S. B. et al. (2014). A Framework for Risk Management Practices and Organizational Performance in Higher Education. Review of Integrative Business & Economics Research, 3, 422-432.
[3]  Decree of the Minister of Finance Number (2021) 209/KMK.05/2021. The Designation of the Yogyakarta Veterans National Development University at the Ministry of Education and Culture as a Government Agency that implements the Public Service Agency Financial Management Pattern.
[4]  Government Regulation Number 23 (2005). Regulation Concerning Financial Management of Public Service Agencies.
[5]  Government Regulation Number 60 (2008). Regulation Concerning Government Internal Control Systems.
[6]  Griffiths, P. (2005). Risk Based Auditing. Gower Publishing Company.
[7]  Hanafi, M. M. (2006). Risk Management. UPP STIM YKPN.
[8]  Helsloot, I., & Jong, W. (2006). Risk Management in Higher Education and Research in the Netherlands. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 14, 142-159.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2006.00490.x
[9]  Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2010). The Value of Enterprise Risk Management. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78, 795-822.
[10]  Jogiyanto, H. M. (2004). Business Research Methodology: Misconceptions and Experiences. BPFE.
[11]  Joint Australian New Zealand International Standard (AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009) (2009). Risk Management—Principles and Guidelines.
[12]  Law Number 12 of 2012 concerning Higher Education.
https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/39063/uu-no-12-tahun-2012
[13]  Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Method. Beverly Hills, Sage Publications.
[14]  Minister of Finance Regulation Number 191/PMK.09/2008 (2008). Regulation Concerning the Implementation of Risk Management in the Ministry of Finance.
[15]  Moeller, R. R. (2007). COSO Enterprise Risk Management: Understanding the New Integrated ERM Framework. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[16]  Moeller, R. R. (2011). COSO Enterprise Risk Management: Establishing Effective Governance, Risk, and Compliance Processes Second. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269145
[17]  National Standardisation Agency SNI ISO 31000:2018. (2018). Risk Management—Principles and Guidelines. Principles and Guidelines. Jakarta: National Standardisation Agency.
https://perpustakaan.bsn.go.id/repository/ca09e618c360ecd38f4f0ccfc828a2ff.pdf
[18]  Regulation of the Minister of National Education of the Republic of Indonesia Number 33 (2009). Regulation Concerning Guidelines for Appointing Supervisory Boards at State Universities Within the Ministry of National Education Implementing Financial Management of Public Service Bodies.
[19]  Regulation of the Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia Number 85 (2017). Regulation Concerning the Statutes of the Yogyakarta Veterans National Development University.
[20]  Sugiyono (2007). Understanding Qualitative Research. Alphabeta.
[21]  The Institute of Risk Management (IRM) and The Association of Insurance and Risk Managers (AIRMIC). (2002). A Risk Management Standard.
[22]  Tufano, P. (2011). Managing Risk in Higher Education. Forum for the Future Higher Education, 54-58.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133