全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

论阿尔都塞对马克思与黑格尔辩证法关系的解读
On Althusser’s Interpretation of the Relationship between Marx and Hegel’s Dialectics

DOI: 10.12677/ACPP.2024.132039, PP. 255-261

Keywords: “颠倒”,阿尔都塞,辩证法,马克思
“Upside Down”
, Althusser, Dialectics, Marx

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

如何理解马克思辩证法和黑格尔辩证法的关系,一直是国内理论界研究的重要问题。马克思本人并未有过专门论述辩证法的著作,以致后来学者对辩证法所涉及的“颠倒”概念难以达成一致的解读。在近代辩证法发展的历程中,“颠倒”问题作为马克思辩证法中的重要问题,如何理解“颠倒”概念是厘清马克思与黑格尔二者之间辩证法的关系的关键。阿尔都塞从辩证法本身去研析辩证法的性质,在反对以往传统观点对于“颠倒”概念的解读的基础上,推演出马克思辩证法时所呈现的“颠倒”的内在本质。
How to understand the relationship between Marx’s dialectics and Hegel’s dialectics has always been an important issue in domestic theoretical circles. Marx himself did not have a special treatise on dialectics, so later scholars on dialectics involved in the concept of “upside down” difficult to reach a consensus interpretation. In the course of the development of modern dialectics, the prob-lem of “inversion” is an important issue in Marx’s dialectics. How to understand the concept of “in-version” is the key to clarify the dialectic relationship between Marx and Hegel. Althusser studied the nature of dialectics from its own point of view, and on the basis of opposing the traditional in-terpretation of the concept of “upside down”, he performed the internal nature of “upside down” presented in Marx’s dialectics.

References

[1]  马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集: 第5卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009.
[2]  阿尔都塞. 保卫马克思[M]. 顾良, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2010.
[3]  王雨辰. 论阿尔都塞对决定论式的马克思主义理论的批判及其当代效应[J]. 苏州大学学报, 2017, 38(6): 31-39.
[4]  毕芙蓉. 论结构主义与马克思主义——以阿尔都塞为例[J]. 理论探讨, 2017(5): 63-68.
[5]  衣俊卿. 西方马克思主义概论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008.
[6]  陈先达. 被肢解的马克思[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1990.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413