健康教育联合心理护理对不孕不育患者干预效果分析
Analysis of the Intervention Effect of Health Education Combined with Psychological Nursing on Infertility Patients

目的：探讨健康教育联合心理护理干预对不孕不育患者护理效果的分析。方法：选取2021年1月~2022年12月来我院收治的不孕不育患者126例，将其随机分为对照组和干预组各63例，对照组给予常规护理方法，干预组在此基础上采用健康教育联合心理护理措施，比较两组护理效果。结果：干预组(96.8%)对治疗有信心比率高于对照组(77.8%)，差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。比较患者护理前SAS、SDS评分，两组差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。而干预组护理后SAS及SDS评分均低于对照组，差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。比较两组患者护理后生活质量评分，分别在生理、心理、社会关系、生活环境等4个方面，干预组评分均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。比较两组患者护理满意度，干预组在护理方式、护理服务、护理环境及护理满意度等方面评分均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。而干预组在患者焦虑与抑郁自评分、生活质量评分、护理满意度等方面评分均高于对照组，二者差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。结论：对不孕不育患者实施健康教育联合心理干预效果显著，能够提升护理满意度，值得临床护理广泛应用。
Objective: To explore the effect of health education combined with psychological nursing intervention on the nursing of infertility patients. Methods: 126 cases of infertility patients admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were randomly divided into control group and intervention group with 63 cases in each group. The control group was given routine nursing methods, and the intervention group was given health education combined with psychological nursing measures on the basis of this, and the nursing effects of the two groups were compared. Results: The rate of confidence in treatment in the intervention group (96.8%) was higher than that in the control group (77.8%), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups before nursing (P > 0.05). The SAS and SDS scores in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The score of quality of life after nursing was compared between the two groups. The score of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group in four aspects, including physiology, psychology, social relationship and living environment, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). The nursing satisfaction of the two groups was compared. The scores of the intervention group in nursing style, nursing service, nursing environment and nursing satisfaction were higher than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). The scores of anxiety and depression, quality of life and nursing satisfaction in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The effect of health education combined with psychological intervention on infertility patients is significant, which can improve nursing satisfaction and is worthy of clinical nursing.