Introduction: While autograft bone is the gold standard for multilevel posterolateral lumbar fusion, bone substitutes and graft extenders such as allograft bone, ceramics and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) have been used to avoid the morbidity and insufficient quantity associated with harvesting autologous bone. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to determine whether, in patients with increased risk of operative nonunion related to multilevel fusion, adding DBM fibers to mineralized bone allograft resulted in better fusion than using allograft alone. The secondary objectives were to evaluate how adding DBM fibers affects functional disability, low back pain, intraoperative blood loss and the nonunion rate. Methods: This retrospective study involved a chart review of consecutive patients who underwent multilevel lumbar spinal fusion and were operated on by a single surgeon. The patients were divided into two groups: 14 patients received mineralized bone allograft (control group) and 14 patients received a combination of mineralized bone allograft and DBM (experimental group). Patients were reviewed at a mean of 16.4 ± 2.2 months after surgery at which point CT scans were analyzed to determine whether fusion had occurred; Oswestry disability index (ODI) and pain were also evaluated. Results: A mean of 5 levels [min 2, max 13] were fused in these patients. Posterolateral fusion as defined by the Lenke classification was not significantly different between groups. The experimental DBM group had a significantly better composite fusion score than the control group (P < 0.0001). No differences were found in ODI, pain and nonunion rate between groups. Intraoperative blood loss was lower in the DBM group compared to the control group but not significantly. There were no complications during or after the surgery. Discussion: Adding DBM fibers to allograft bone during multilevel posterolateral spinal fusion was safe and produced better composite fusion than using allograft only as an autograft extender.
References
[1]
Hsu, W.K., Nickoli, M.S., Wang, J.C., Lieberman, J.R., An, H.S., Yoon, S.T., et al. (2012) Improving the Clinical Evidence of Bone Graft Substitute Technology in Lumbar Spine Surgery. Global Spine Journal, 2, 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1315454
[2]
Han, S., Park, B., Lim, J.W., Youm, J.Y., Choi, S.W., Kim, D.H., et al. (2020) Comparison of Fusion Rate between Demineralized Bone Matrix versus Autograft in Lumbar Fusion: Meta-analysis. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 63, 673-680. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2019.0185
[3]
Borg, T.D. and Mealey B.L. (2015) Histologic Healing Following Tooth Extraction with Ridge Preservation Using Mineralized versus Combined Mineralized-Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Journal of Periodontology, 86, 348-355. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.140483
[4]
von Elm, E., Altman, D.G., Egger, M., Pocock, S.J., Gotzsche, P.C. and Vandenbroucke, J.P. (2008) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiolology, 61, 344-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
[5]
Lenke, L.G., Bridwell, K.H., Bullis, D., Betz, R.R., Baldus, C. and Schoenecker, P.L. (1992) Results of in situ Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis. Journal of Spinal Disorders, 5, 433-442. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-199212000-00008
[6]
Santos, E.R., Goss, D.G., Morcom, R.K. and Fraser, R.D. (2003) Radiologic Assessment of Interbody Fusion Using Carbon Fiber Cages. Spine, 28, 997-1001. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000061988.93175.74
[7]
Fairbank, J.C. and Pynsent, P.B. (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine, 25, 2940-2952. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017
[8]
Brown, C.W., Orme, T.J. and Richardson, H.D. (1986) The Rate of Pseudarthrosis (Surgical Nonunion) in Patients Who Are Smokers and Patients Who Are Nonsmokers: A Comparison Study. Spine, 11, 942-943. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017
[9]
Chun, D.S., Baker, K.C. and Hsu, W.K. (2015) Lumbar Pseudarthrosis: A Review of Current Diagnosis and Treatment. Neurosurgical Focus, 39, E10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15292
[10]
Guppy, K.H., Royce, K.E., Norheim, E.P., Moller, D.J., Suen, P.W., Rahman, S.U., et al. (2021) Operative Nonunion Rates in Posterolateral Lumbar Fusions: Analysis of a Cohort of 2591 Patients from a National Spine Registry. World Neurosurgery, 145, e131-e140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.142
[11]
Shepard, N.A., Rush, A.J., Scarborough, N.L., Carter, A.J. and Phillips, F.M. (2021) Demineralized Bone Matrix in Spine Surgery: A Review of Current Applications and Future Trends. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 15, 113-119. https://doi.org/10.14444/8059
[12]
Russell, N., Walsh, W.R., Lovric, V., Kim, P., Chen, J.H., Larson, M.J., et al. (2020) In-Vivo Performance of Seven Commercially Available Demineralized Bone Matrix Fiber and Putty Products in a Rat Posterolateral Fusion Model. Frontiers in Surgery, 7, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00010
[13]
Mahesh, B., Upendra, B., Vijay, S., Arun Kumar, G. and Reddy, S. (2017) Complication Rate during Multilevel Lumbar Fusion in Patients above 60 years. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 51, 139-146. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.201704
[14]
Fu, T.S., Wang, I.C., Lu, M.L., Hsieh, M.K., Chen, L.H. and Chen, W.J. (2006) The Fusion Rate of Demineralized Bone Matrix compared with Autogenous Iliac Bone Graft for Long Multi-Segment Posterolateral Spinal Fusion. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 17, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0861-2
[15]
Buser, Z., Brodke, D.S., Youssef, J.A., Rometsch, E., Park, J.B., Yoon, S.T., et al. (2018) Allograft versus Demineralized Bone Matrix in Instrumented and Noninstrumented Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review. Global Spine Journal, 8, 396-412. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0861-2
