全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

中国绿色全要素生产率时空分异及因素分解研究——基于超效率SBM和Malmquist指数
A Study on the Spatio-Temporal Differentiation and Factor Decomposition of China’s Green Total Factor Productivity—Based on the Super-Efficiency SBM and Malmquist Index

DOI: 10.12677/ORF.2024.141035, PP. 367-379

Keywords: 绿色全要素生产率,数据包络分析,RD分解法,区域异质性
Green Total Factor Productivity
, Data Envelopment Analysis, RD Decomposition Method, Regional Heterogeneity

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文使用超效率SBM和Malmquist指数方法对中国30个省(区、市)2003~2019年的绿色全要素生产率(GTFP)进行测算,并采用RD分解法将Malmquist指数分解为效率变动、技术变动和规模变动,通过对比全国及东中西地区GTFP变动及其分解值,本文的主要结论有:1) 我国整体的GTFP呈现出上升态势,区域间的GTFP表现为东部 > 西部 > 中部,东部和西部地区GTFP增速快得益于区域内个别增长极拉动地区GTFP的增长,而中部地区GTFP的增速慢受限于区域内个别省份增长势能不足;2) 全国层面存在技术进步、规模扩大和效率下降情况,并且在东、中、西部地区之间存在区域异质性。为进一步提高中国GTFP,提出如下建议:全国层面要加强要素的跨区域流动,促进区域协调发展。东部地区更应促进优势产业集聚、扩大规模,而中西部地区更应加大研发投入、促进技术进步。
In this paper, we use the super-efficiency SBM and Malmquist index methods to measure green total factor productivity (GTFP) for 30 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) in China from 2003 to 2019, and used the RD decomposition to decompose Malmquist index into efficiency change, technology change and scale change, by comparing national and sub-regional GTFP’s change and the decomposition values, the main conclusions of this paper are: 1) China’s GTFP shows an upward trend, GTFP between regions shows East > West > Central. The faster growth of GTFP in eastern and western regions is due to some growth poles within the region driving regional GTFP growth, and the slow growth of GTFP in the central region was limited by insufficient growth potential in some provinces. 2) Technical progress, scaling up and efficiency degradation exist at national level, and there is regional heterogeneity between eastern, central and western regions. To improve China’s GTFP, the suggestions are as follow: At the national level, it is important to enhance factors’ cross-regional flow and promote coordinated regional development. The eastern region should promote the clustering expansion of advantaged industries, and the central and western regions need to increase investment in R&D and promote technological progress.

References

[1]  Yang, Y. and Xu, Y. (2023) Do Governance Patterns of Environmental Regulation Affect Firm’s Technological Innovation: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 138767.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138767
[2]  Zheng, Q.Q., Wan, L., Wang, S.Y. and Chen, Z.X. (2023) Will Informal Environmental Regulation Induce Residents to form a Green Lifestyle? Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 9, 106835.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106835
[3]  殷宝庆. 环境规制与我国制造业绿色全要素生产率——基于国际垂直专业化视角的实证[J]. 中国人口?资源与环境, 2022, 12(22): 60-66.
[4]  陈诗一. 中国的绿色工业革命: 基于环境全要素生产率视角的解释(1980-2008) [J]. 经济研究, 2010, 45(11): 21-34+58.
[5]  宋长青, 刘聪粉, 王晓军. 中国绿色全要素生产率测算及分解: 1985-2010 [J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 14(3): 120-127.
https://doi.org/10.13968/j.cnki.1009-9107.2014.03.017
[6]  王兵, 刘光天. 节能减排与中国绿色经济增长——基于全要素生产率是视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015(5): 57-69.
[7]  周祎庆, 聂元昆. 中国绿色全要素生产率动态测算与区域特征分解[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(20): 37-42.
https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2022.20.007
[8]  刘战豫, 孙夏令. 中国物流业绿色全要素生产率的时空演化及动因分析[J]. 软科学, 2018, 32(4): 77-81+114.
https://doi.org/10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2018.04.17
[9]  Chen, C., Ye, F., Xiao, H. and Xie, W. (2023) The Digital Economy, Spatial Spillovers and Forestry Green Total Factor Productivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 405, 136890.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136890
[10]  Tone, K. (2002) A Slacks-Based Measure of Super-Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 32-41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00324-1
[11]  章祥荪, 贵斌威. 中国全要素生产率分析: Malmquist指数法评述与应用[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2008(6): 111-122.
[12]  Ying, T. and Chao, F. (2022) The Inter-nal-Structural Effects of Different Types of Environmental Regultions on China’s Green Total Factor Productivity. Energy Economics, 113, 106246.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106246
[13]  张婷, 王玮蓉, 姚昀晨. 中国31个省(区、市)及重点省域科技创新效率评价研究——基于超效率SBM-Malmquist 模型[J]. 科技管理研究, 2023, 43(3): 87-95.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2023.3.011
[14]  Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M. and Zhang, Z. (1994) Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries. The American Economic Review, 84, 66-83.
[15]  Ray, S.C. and Desli, E. (1997) Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries: Comment. The American Economic Review, 87, 1033-1039.
[16]  陈思杭, 雷礼, 周中林. 环境规制、绿色技术进步与绿色经济发展——基于长江经济带11省市面板数据的实证研究[J]. 科学进步与对策, 2022, 39(10): 52-60.
https://doi.org/10.6049/kjjbydc.C202106043
[17]  周晓光, 汤心萌. 时空一致视角下异质性环境规制与绿色经济效率[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42(8): 2114-2128.
https://doi.org/10.12011/SETP2021-2370
[18]  陈超凡. 中国工业绿色全要素生产率及其影响因素——基于ML生产率指数及动态面板模型的实证研究[J]. 统计研究, 2016, 33(3): 53-62.
https://doi.org/10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2016.03.007
[19]  张成, 陆旸, 郭路, 于同申. 环境规制强度和生产技术进步[J]. 经济研究, 2011, 46(2): 113-124.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413