全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于改进VIKOR模型的可持续发展绩效评价仿真
Simulation of Sustainable Development Performance Evaluation Based on Improved VIKOR Model

DOI: 10.12677/ORF.2024.141040, PP. 426-435

Keywords: 可持续发展,绩效评价,多准则决策,交互系数,VIKOR方法
Sustainable Development
, Performance Evaluation, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Interaction Coefficient, VIKOR Method

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

可持续发展理念已深入至企业管理层面,在市场竞争的加剧下,如何评估并优选会计师事务所是提高合作企业竞争能力的有效途径。首先按照可持续发展战略,基于平衡计分卡的思想,从财务性、顾客性、内部业务流程性和学习与成长四个维度构建评价指标体系;其次,阐述关联性准则的模糊测度表征的shapley值和交互系数;再次,提出包含准则交互系数的改进型VIKOR方法;最后,对会计师事务所的可持续发展绩效数据进行应用研究。
The concept of sustainable development has reached the level of corporate management, how to evaluate and prefer accounting firms is an effective way to improve the competitiveness of cooperative enterprises. Firstly, in accordance with the sustainable development strategy and based on the idea of balanced scorecard, the evaluation index system is constructed from four dimensions: financial, client, internal processes and learning and growth. Secondly, we elaborate the shapley value and interaction coefficient of the fuzzy measurement characterization of relevance criterion. Thirdly, we put forward the improved VIKOR method which includes the interaction coefficient of the criterion; finally, we conduct an applied research on the sustainable development performance data of accounting firms development performance data for applied research.

References

[1]  Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (2008) The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage.
[2]  黄仕佼, 杨鑫. 企业环境供给与企业绩效的关联性[J]. 技术经济, 2012, 31(4): 104-108.
[3]  Neely, A.D., Adams, C. and Kennerley, M. (2002) The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success. Prentice Hall Financial Times, London.
[4]  Stani?kis, J.K. and Ar-ba?iauskas, V. (2009) Sustainability Performance Indicators for Industrial Enterprise Management. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 48, 42-50. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Sustainability-Performance-Indicators-for-Stani%C5%A1kis-Arba%C4%8Diauskas/f6e6f475f3271f44a04b29a42 5cf34564365ab70
[5]  Ciemleja, G. and Lace, N. (2011) The Model of Sustainable Performance of Small and Medium-sized Enterprise. Engineering Economics, 22, 501-509. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232723711_ The_Model_of_Sustainable_Performance_of_Small_and_Medium- sized_Enterprise
[6]  徐杰, 杨晓倩. BSC和模糊积分法下的农村扶贫绩效审计评价[J]. 财会月报, 2019(12): 97-105.
[7]  安景文, 朱伟, 李松林, 等. 基于拓展型BSC-FANP模型的煤炭企业绩效评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2018, 34(18): 181-184.
[8]  周静, 孙健. 基于AHP-DEA模型的冷链物流企业绩效评价[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2015(5): 114-119.
[9]  李国良, 李忠富, 付强. 基于投影寻踪模型的企业绩效评价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2011, 20(4): 170-175.
[10]  乔均, 祁晓荔, 储俊松. 基于平衡计分卡模型的电信企业绩效评价研究——以中国网络通信集团江苏省公司为例[J]. 中国工业经济, 2007(2): 110-118.
[11]  周雄勇, 许志端. 数字追溯对食品企业可持续发展绩效的影响——基于动态能力视角[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2022, 43(8): 129-144.
[12]  席龙胜, 赵辉. 高管双元环保认知、绿色创新与企业可持续发展绩效[J]. 经济管理, 2022, 44(3): 139-158.
[13]  Badi, I. and Abdulshahed, A. (2021) Sustainability Performance Measurement for Libyan Iron and Steel Company Using Rough AHP. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 1, 22-34.
https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic1001202222b
[14]  Olawumi, T.O. and Chan, D.W.M. (2021) Green-Building Information Modelling (Green-BIM) Assessment Framework for Evaluating Sustainability Performance of Building Projects: A Case of Nigeria. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 17, 5-6.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2020.1852910
[15]  陶媛婷, 罗文波. 会计师事务所参与预算绩效管理的实践路径探究[J]. 财会通讯, 2022(22): 163-168+176.
[16]  江文奇, 袁亚纯. 融合关联性准则模糊测度的改进型VIKOR方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 94-98.
[17]  武建章, 张强. 基于2-可加模糊测度的多准则决策方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(7): 1229-1237.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413