全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

多情景模拟下南四湖流域生态系统服务权衡变化研究
Study on Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs Change in Nansihu Lake Basin under Multi-Scenario Simulation

DOI: 10.12677/GSER.2024.131007, PP. 57-69

Keywords: 南四湖流域,土地利用,情景分析,生态系统服务,相互关系
Nansihu Lake Basin
, Land Use, Scenario Analysis, Ecosystem Services, Interrelationships

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

南四湖是中国第六大湖,也是南水北调东线工程的重要调水区。本文利用InVEST模型、生态效益评估方法和情景模拟法,通过分析区域典型生态系统服务间的相互关系,模拟多种生态管理情景下的土地利用变化,以预测其对生态系统服务价值及其作用关系的影响。研究结果表明:五种模拟情景下,生境质量和授粉服务的变化程度最大;城市自然增长情景与四种生态保护情景下生态系统服务间的相互关系变化相差较大,但是在四种生态保护情景里各服务间的相互关系相差较小;滨岸带退耕还林生态保护情景下总体效益最佳,南四湖流域未来规划应偏向滨岸带退耕还林生态保护情景。
Nansi Lake is the sixth largest lake in China, and it serves as a crucial water diverting lake for the eastern route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. This study utilizes the InVEST model, ecological benefit assessment methods, and scenario simulation to analyze the interrelationships among typical ecosystem services in the region, simulating land use changes under various ecological management scenarios to predict their impact on the value of ecosystem services and their interrelationships. The results show that habitat quality and pollination services change the most under five simulated scenarios; the interrelationship changes among ecosystem services under the urban natural growth scenario and four ecological protection scenarios are significantly different, but the differences in interrelationships among services within the four ecological protection scenarios are minor; the overall benefits are best under the scenario of returning farmland to forest in the riparian zone, suggesting that future planning for the Nansi Lake basin should favor this ecological protection scenario.

References

[1]  Robert, C., Ralph, D., Rudolf, D., et al. (1997) The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature, 387, 253-260.
https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
[2]  Robert, V.O.O. (1998) Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Ecology, 79, 1118-1119.
[3]  吕乐婷, 任甜甜, 李赛赛, 等. 基于InVEST模型的大连市产水量时空变化分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(4): 144-150, 157.
[4]  Elena, M.B., Garry, D.P. and Line, J.G. (2009) Understanding Relationships among Multiple Ecosystem Services. Ecology Letters, 12, 1394-1404.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
[5]  冯漪, 曹银贵, 李胜鹏, 等. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究:发展历程与研究特征[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(1): 11-25.
[6]  Sun, X.Y., Ye, D.Y., Shan, R.F., et al. (2022) Effect of Physical Geographic and Socioeconomic Processes on Interactions among Ecosystem Services Based on Machine Learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 359, Article ID: 131976.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131976
[7]  余玉洋, 李晶, 周自翔, 等. 基于多尺度秦巴山区生态系统服务权衡协同关系的表达[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(16): 5465-5477.
[8]  方露露, 许德华, 王伦澈, 等. 长江, 黄河流域生态系统服务变化及权衡协同关系研 [J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 821-838.
[9]  Anna-Lena, R., Verena, B., Christian, D., et al. (2020) Temporal Patterns in Ecosystem Services Research: A Review and Three Recommendations. Ambio, 49, 1377-1393.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01292-w
[10]  Zhao, Y.N., Wang, M., Lan, T.H., et al. (2023) Distinguishing the Effects of Land Use Policies on Ecosystem Services and Their Trade-Offs Based on Multi-Scenario Simulations. Applied Geography, 151, Article ID: 102864.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102864
[11]  Alison, G.P. (2010) Ecosystem Services and Agriculture: Tradeoffs and Synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2959-2971.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
[12]  Shaikh, S.H., Lin, Z., Giashuddin, M., et al. (2020) Impact of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services: A Review. Environmental Development, 34, Article ID: 100527.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100527
[13]  Francesc, B., Erik, G. and Dagmar, H. (2017) Ecosystem Service Bundles along the Urban-Rural Gradient: Insights for Landscape Planning and Management. Ecosystem Services, 24, 147-159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.021
[14]  Alejandra, M.O., Aitor, A., Miquel, D.C., et al. (2020) Future Trade-Offs and Synergies among Ecosystem Services in Mediterranean Forests under Global Change Scenarios. Ecosystem Services, 45, Article ID: 101174.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101174
[15]  Chen, S.L., Liu, X.T., Li, Y., et al. (2023) Variations in Ecosystem Service Value and Its Driving Factors in the Nanjing Metropolitan Area of China. Forests, 14, Article 113.
https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010113
[16]  da Silva Anjinho, P., Guimar?es Araujo Barbosa, M.A. and Mauad, F.F. (2022) Evaluation of InVEST’s Water Ecosystem Service Models in a Brazilian Subtropical Basin. Water, 14, Article 1559.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14101559
[17]  Yi, Y., Zhang, C., Zhu, J.Q., et al. (2022) Spatio-Temporal Evolution, Prediction and Optimization of LUCC Based on CA-Markov and InVEST Models: A Case Study of Mentougou District, Beijing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, Article 2432.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042432
[18]  Zhang, X.Q., Chen, P., Dai, S.N., et al. (2022) Assessment of the Value of Regional Water Conservation Services Based on SWAT Model. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194, Article No. 559.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10247-w
[19]  Zhang, J.G., Zhu, W.B., Zhu, L.Q. and Li, Y.H. (2022) Multi-Scale Analysis of Trade-Off/Synergistic Effects of Forest Ecosystem Services in the Funiu Mountain Region, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32, 981-999.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-1981-x
[20]  Sun, X.Y., Shan, R.F. and Liu, F. (2020) Spatio-Temporal Quantification of Patterns, Trade-Offs and Synergies among Multiple Hydrological Ecosystem Services in Different Topographic Basins. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, Article ID: 122338.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122338
[21]  Li, G.Z. and Cai, J. (2022) Spatial and Temporal Differentiation of Mountain Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Synergies: A Case Study of Jieshi Mountain, China. Sustainability, 14, Article 4652.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084652
[22]  Zhang, X.L., Jin, X.B., Liang, X.Y., et al. (2022) Implications of Land Sparing and Sharing for Maintaining Regional Ecosystem Services: An Empirical Study from a Suitable Area for Agricultural Production in China. Science of the Total Environment, 820, Article ID: 153330.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153330
[23]  Chen, T.T., Li, P. and Wang, Q. (2022) Response and Multiscenario Simulation of Trade-Offs/Synergies among Ecosystem Services to the Grain to Green Program: A Case Study of the Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 33572-33586.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18336-y
[24]  Sun, Z.X., Liu, Y. and Sang, H.B. (2023) Spatial-Temporal Variation and Driving Factors of Ecological Vulnerability in Nansi Lake Basin, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20, 2653-2653.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032653
[25]  Sun, X.Y., Jiang, Z., Liu, F., et al. (2019) Monitoring Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Habitat Quality in Nansihu Lake Basin, Eastern China, from 1980 to 2015. Ecological Indicators, 102, 716-723.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.03.041
[26]  Irina, H. and Juha, H. (2008) Agricultural Drainage Ditches, Their Biological Importance and Functioning. Biological Conservation, 141, 1171-1183.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.005
[27]  Samantha, S.K.S., Astrid, J.A.V. and Peter, H.V. (2015) Integrating Socio-Cultural Perspectives into Ecosystem Service Valuation: A Review of Concepts and Methods. Ecological Economics, 114, 67-78.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007
[28]  Liu, L.M. and Wu, J.G. (2022) Scenario Analysis in Urban Ecosystem Services Research: Progress, Prospects, and Implications for Urban Planning and Management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 224, Article ID: 104433.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104433

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413