全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

矿业企业ESG体系构建研究
Research on ESG System Construction of Mining Enterprises

DOI: 10.12677/FIA.2024.131011, PP. 65-76

Keywords: 环境、社会责任与公司治理,矿业企业,差异分析
Environment
, Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance, Mining Enterprises, Difference Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

二十大报告指出,我国生态文明战略任务是推进“双碳”目标,以实现可持续发展。ESG作为关注环境、社会和治理的可持续发展理念,与“双碳”目标不谋而合,逐渐成为评价企业可持续发展能力的核心理念和框架体系。矿业企业作为污染较重的行业,其ESG表现深受社会公众关注,矿业企业ESG体系的合理构建迫在眉睫。本文列出了国际前沿的ESG准则,指出了与我国现有规范的差异。通过对国内外纽蒙特(Newmont)和紫金矿业两家典型矿业企业进行双案例研究,探讨了矿业企业ESG报告体系在国内外的差异,结合案例分析了两家公司在环境、社会责任和治理中的不同表现,总结了形成差异的原因,并为我国矿业企业的ESG信息披露和体系构建提供可参考意见。
The report of the 20th National Congress pointed out that the strategic task of China’s ecological civilization is to advance the “double carbon” target in order to achieve sustainable development. ESG, as a sustainable development concept that focuses on environment, society and governance, coincides with the “double carbon” target and gradually becomes the core concept and framework to evaluate the sustainable development capability of enterprises. The ESG performance of mining enterprises, as a heavily polluted industry, has been paid close attention to by the public, so it is urgent to construct the ESG system of mining enterprises. This paper lists the ESG standards of the international frontier and points out the differences with China’s existing standards. Based on the double case study of Newmont and Zijin Mining enterprises, this paper discusses the difference of ESG reporting system between domestic and foreign mining enterprises, analyzes the different performance of the two companies in environment, social responsibility and governance, summarizes the reasons for the difference, and provides a reference for the ESG information disclosure and system construction of mining enterprises in China.

References

[1]  黄渤. 中国特色ESG实践的新要求[J]. 中国金融, 2023(3): 17-18.
[2]  段濛. 互联网企业的ESG体系构建——基于亚马逊与拼多多的双案例研究[J]. 管理会计研究, 2022(6): 44-54.
[3]  袁蓉丽, 江纳, 刘梦瑶. ESG研究综述与展望[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(17): 128-134.
https://doi.org/10.19641/j.cnki.42-1290/f.2022.17.017
[4]  黄世忠. 支撑ESG的三大理论支柱[J]. 财会月刊, 2021(19): 3-10.
https://doi.org/10.19641/j.cnki.42-1290/f.2021.19.001
[5]  黄世忠. ESG视角下价值创造的三大变革[J]. 财务研究, 2021(6): 3-14.
https://doi.org/10.14115/j.cnki.10-1242/f.2021.06.002
[6]  冯波, 司冠华. 国际主流ESG信息披露标准进展及对金融机构的影响[J]. 可持续发展经济导刊, 2023(10): 28-33.
[7]  王鹏程, 孙玫, 黄世忠, 等. 两项国际财务报告可持续披露准则分析与展望[J]. 财会月刊, 2023, 44(14): 3-13.
https://doi.org/10.19641/j.cnki.42-1290/f.2023.14.001
[8]  邓建平, 白宇昕. 域外ESG信息披露制度的回顾及启示[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(12): 75-80.
https://doi.org/10.19641/j.cnki.42-1290/f.2022.12.009
[9]  席妮妮, 刘东山. 紫金矿业ESG信息披露的探索实践与经验启示[J]. 财务与会计, 2023(17): 69-70.
[10]  孙忠娟, 郁竹, 路雨桐. 中国ESG信息披露标准发展现状、问题与建议[J]. 财会通讯, 2023(8): 9-14.
https://doi.org/10.16144/j.cnki.issn1002-8072.2023.08.002
[11]  孙慧, 刘世强. 我国上市公司ESG信息披露现状分析及对策研究[J]. 市场周刊, 2023, 36(10): 111-115.
[12]  马喜立. 中国ESG投资的发展趋势研究[J]. 广义虚拟经济研究, 2019, 10(2): 33-38.
[13]  杨蕙宇. 国内外ESG体系的比较[J]. 企业改革与管理, 2020(2): 51-52.
https://doi.org/10.13768/j.cnki.cn11-3793/f.2020.0126
[14]  孙仁斌, 阴秀琦, 邢万里, 等. 矿业企业践行ESG理念的现状和启示——以洛阳钼业为例[J]. 银行家, 2023(11): 119-122.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133