全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

2019~2021年我国省域高技术产业发展水平测度
Measurement of the Development Level of China’s Provincial High-Tech Industries from 2019 to 2021

DOI: 10.12677/SA.2024.131022, PP. 202-219

Keywords: 2019~2021,高技术产业,省域,CRITIC赋权法,非整秩次秩和比
2019~2021
, High-Tech Industry, Provinces, CRITIC Weighting Method, Non-Integral Rank Sum Ra-tio

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

高技术产业是运用高技术进行开发和生产,所生产产品性能和功能优异,附加值较高,逐渐成为决定国家竞争力的重要行业。本文基于2020~2022年《中国高技术产业年鉴》的相关数据,运用CRITIC客观赋权法和非整秩次秩和比对中国30个省(市、区)的高技术产业发展水平进行分级评价。其中,西藏多项指标数据缺失,且当地高技术产业发展水平极低难以找到其他数据参考,因此对西藏做删除处理。通过分析结果发现,广东、江苏、浙江、北京和山东高技术产业发展水平较高,内蒙古、青海、宁夏、新疆高技术发展水平较薄弱,在分析各地差异的基础上,提出促进各地高技术产业协调发展的建议。
The high-tech industry is the application of high-tech for development and production, producing products with excellent performance and functionality, high added value, and gradually becoming an important industry that determines national competitiveness. Based on the relevant data of China High-tech Industry Yearbook from 2020 to 2022, this paper uses CRITIC objective weighting method and non-integer rank sum ratio to evaluate the development level of high-tech industry in 30 provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) in China. Among them, a number of indica-tors in Tibet are missing, and the development level of the local high-tech industry is extremely low. It is difficult to find other data references, so Tibet is deleted. Through the analysis results, it is found that the development level of high-tech industries in Guangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Beijing and Shandong is relatively high, while the development level of high-tech industries in Inner Mon-golia, Qinghai, Ningxia and Xinjiang is relatively weak. On the basis of analyzing the differences among different regions, this paper puts forward some suggestions to promote the coordinated de-velopment of high-tech industries in different regions.

References

[1]  Hultink, E.J. (1994) Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry. Design Studies, 15, 234-235.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)90031-0
[2]  Root, F.R. (1990) U.S. High Technology Industry and International Competitiveness. The Journal of High Technology Management Research. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 1, 91-102.
https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-8310(90)90015-V
[3]  斋藤优. 技术开发论: 日本的技术开发机制与政策[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 1996.
[4]  杜梦灵. 我国省际高技术产业发展质量评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2021.
[5]  Mustapha, N., Hashim, N. and Yacob, R. (2013) Technical Components of Total Factor Productivity Growth in Malaysian Manufacturing Industry. Applied Mathematics, 4, 1251-1259.
https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2013.49169
[6]  桂俊煜. 我国省域高技术产业发展水平测度与提升策略[J]. 经济纵横, 2018(7): 83- 92.
[7]  李萌. 我国各省高技术产业发展评价[J]. 财经界, 2013(30): 103-151.
[8]  杨庆, 张贝尔, 蒋旭东, 等. 长江经济带高技术产业发展效率评价及区域影响因素研究[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2018(8): 68-74.
[9]  张亚峰, 王彭德. 基于三种权重的功效系数法在企业经济效益评价中的应用[J]. 洛阳师范学院学报, 2019, 38(2): 61-65.
[10]  付维华, 付尧, 李文帅. 秩和比法(RSR法)在环境污染健康损害中的应用[J]. 广州化工, 2012, 40(3): 101-103.

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133