People often wonder why physically attractive individuals seem to enjoy numerous
benefits. In the contemporary landscape, AI-generated characters are gaining popularity,
often selected for their physical attractiveness. This study adopts a persuasion-attitude
perspective, utilizing the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), to uncover the reasons
behind the persuasive impact of physical attractiveness and the subsequent favorable
decisions made by individuals. Employing structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques,
the study conducted a multi-group analysis with a sample of 134 recruiters in the food and beverage industry. The
key findings reveal that while recruiters tend to prefer hiring physically attractive
applicants due to affective information processing, the moderator role of recruiters’
need for cognition can significantly mitigate this stereotype premium. These findings
have important implications for future research and practice. Understanding the
interplay between physical attractiveness, cognitive
processing, and decision-making process can contribute to the development of strategies to promote fair and
objective decision-making processes.
References
[1]
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations. Gender & Society, 20, 441-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499
[2]
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
[3]
Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A., & Narayandas, D. (2009a). Business Market Management: Understanding, Creating, and Delivering Value. Prentice Hall.
[4]
Anderson, M. I., Simpson, G. K., Morey, P. J., Mok, M. M., Gosling, T. J., & Gillett, L. E. (2009b). Differential Pathways of Psychological Distress in Spouses vs. Parents of People with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): Multi-Group Analysis. Brain Injury, 23, 931-943. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699050903302336
[5]
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[6]
Braunstein, L. A., & Stull, W. A. (2001). Employer Benefits of, and Attitudes toward Postsecondary Cooperative Education. Journal of Cooperative Education, 36, 7-22.
[7]
Bye, D., & Pushkar, D. (2009). How Need for Cognition and Perceived Control Are Differentially Linked to Emotional Outcomes in the Transition to Retirement. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 320-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9135-3
[8]
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming.
[9]
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
[10]
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional Differences in Cognitive Motivation: The Life and Times of Individuals Varying in Need for Cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
[11]
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Kao, C. F., & Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion: An Individual Difference Perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032-1043. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.5.1032
[12]
Cao, X., Liu, Y., Zhu, Z., Hu, J., & Chen, X. (2017). Online Selection of a Physician by Patients: Empirical Study from Elaboration Likelihood Perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 403-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.060
[13]
Chen, C. C., Huang, Y. M., & Lee, M. I. (2011). Test of a Model Linking Applicant RéSumé Information and Hiring Recommendations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19, 374-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00566.x
[14]
Chiu, R. K., & Babcock, R. D. (2002). The Relative Importance of Physical Attractiveness and Gender in Hong Kong Selection Decisions. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13, 141-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190110092857
[15]
Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What Is Beautiful Is Good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
[16]
Freeman, J. B., & Johnson, K. L. (2016). More Than Meets the Eye: Split-Second Social Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 362-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.003
[17]
Goodman, J. R., Morris, J. D., & Sutherland, J. C. (2008). Is Beauty a Joy Forever? Young Women’s Emotional Responses to Varying Types of Beautiful Advertising Models. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85, 147-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900808500110
[18]
Gugushvili, A., & Bulczak, G. (2023). Physical Attractiveness and Intergenerational Social Mobility. Social Science Quarterly, 104, 1360-1382. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13320
[19]
Hallahan, K. (1999). Content Class as a Contextual Cue in the Cognitive Processing of Publicity versus Advertising. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 293-320. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1104_02
[20]
Higgins, C. A., & Judge, T. A. (2004). The Effect of Applicant Influence Tactics on Recruiter Perceptions of Fit and Hiring Recommendations: A Field Study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 622-632. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.622
[21]
Holbert, R. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Structural Equation Modeling in the Communication Sciences, 1995-2000. Human Communication Research, 28, 531-551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00822.x
[22]
Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (1972). Experimental Social Psychology: Text with Illustrative Readings. Academic Press.
[23]
Kanazawa, S. (2011). Intelligence and Physical Attractiveness. Intelligence, 39, 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.003
[24]
Kirton, G., & Healy, G. (2009). Using Competency‐Based Assessment Centres to Select Judges—Implications for Equality and Diversity. Human Resource Management Journal, 19, 302-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2009.00099.x
[25]
Kuo, J. C., Horng, D. J., Lin, C. L., & Lee, S. H. (2012). The Causal Relationship between Need for Cognition and Advertising Recall. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40, 1025-1032. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.6.1025
[26]
Kwan, S., & Trautner, M. N. (2011). Judging Books by Their Covers: Teaching About Physical Attractiveness Biases. Teaching Sociology, 39, 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X10390655
[27]
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A Longitudinal Study on the Early Development of Leader-Member Exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 662-674. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.662
[28]
Macias, W. (2003). A Preliminary Structural Equation Model of Comprehension and Persuasion of Interactive Advertising Brand Web Sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 3, 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2003.10722072
[29]
Mehrabian, A. (1996). Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance: A General Framework for Describing and Measuring Individual Differences in Temperament. Current Psychology, 14, 261-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686918
[30]
Montoya, R. M. (2014). You’re Better Than I If You’re Hotter Than I: The Role of Objective Physical Attractiveness in the Physical Attractiveness Stereotype. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale—International Review of Social Psychology, 27, 109-122.
[31]
Morris, J. D., Woo, C., & Singh, A. J. (2005). Elaboration Likelihood Model: A Missing Intrinsic Emotional Implication. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 14, 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740171
[32]
Njus, D., & Johnson, D. R. (2008). Need for Cognition as a Predictor of Psychosocial Identity Development. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 142, 645-655. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.142.6.645-655
[33]
Palmer, J. K., & Feldman, J. M. (2005). Accountability and Need for Cognition Effects on Contrast, Halo, and Accuracy in Performance Ratings. The Journal of Psychology, 139, 119-138. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.139.2.119-138
[34]
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. WC Brown Co.
[35]
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986a). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (pp. 1-24). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1
[36]
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986b). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
[37]
Ryabov, I. (2019). How Much Does Physical Attractiveness Matter for Blacks? Linking Skin Color, Physical Attractiveness, and Black Status Attainment. Race and Social Problems, 11, 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-018-9245-1
[38]
Sicilia, M., Ruiz, S., & Reynolds, N. (2006). Attitude Formation Online: How the Consumer’s Need for Cognition Affects the Relationship between Attitude towards the Website and Attitude towards the Brand. International Journal of Market Research, 48, 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530604800204
[39]
Verplanken, B., Hofstee, G., & Janssen, H. J. W. (1998). Accessibility of Affective Versus Cognitive Components of Attitude. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199801/02)28:1<23::AID-EJSP843>3.0.CO;2-Z
[40]
Watkins, L. M., & Johnston, L. (2000). Screening Job Applicants: The Impact of Physical Attractiveness and Application Quality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00135
[41]
Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The Role-Based Performance Scale: Validity Analysis of a Theory-Based Measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 540-555. https://doi.org/10.2307/256941
[42]
Wolfe, M.T., & Patel, P. C. (2024). Image Isn’t Everything: Personality Attractiveness, Physical Attractiveness, and Self-Employment Earnings. Small Business Economics, 62, 807-831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00784-0
