In many simulation-based Bayesian approaches to quantile regression,
Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques are employed to generate draws from a
posterior distribution based on an asymmetric Laplace “working” likelihood.
Under flat improper priors, the mode of this posterior distribution is
coincident with the desired quantile function. However, simulation-based
approaches for estimation and inference commonly report a posterior mean as a
point estimate and interpret that mean synonymously with the quantile. In this
note, we analytically derive the exact posterior distribution of a quantile
regression parameter in a simple univariate setting free of covariates. We note
the non-uniqueness of the posterior mode in some cases and conduct a series of
Monte Carlo experiments to compare the sampling performances of posterior means
and modes. Interestingly, and perhaps surprisingly, the mean performs similarly
to, if not favorably to, the mode under several standard metrics, even in very
small samples.
References
[1]
Alhamzawi, R. (2016). Bayesian Model Selection in Ordinal Quantile Regression. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 103, 68-78.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2016.04.014
[2]
Alhamzawi, R., & Ali, H. T. M. (2018). Bayesian Quantile Regression for Ordinal Longitudinal Data. Journal of Applied Statistics, 45, 815-828.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2017.1315059
[3]
Bresson, G., Lacroix, G., & Rahman, M. A. (2021). Bayesian Panel Quantile Regression for Binary Outcomes with Correlated Random Effects: An Application on Crime Recidivism in Canada. Empirical Economics, 60, 227-259.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01893-5
[4]
Chan, J., Koop, G., Poirier, D. J., & Tobias, J. L. (2019). Bayesian Econometric Methods (2nd ed., 486 p.). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525947
[5]
Kedia, P., Kundu, D., & Das, K. (2023). A Bayesian Variable Selection Approach to Longitudinal Quantile Regression. Statistical Methods & Applications, 32, 149-168.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-022-00645-2
[6]
Khare, K., & Hobert, J. P. (2012). Geometric Ergodicity of the Gibbs Sampler for Bayesian Quantile Regression. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 112, 108-116.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2012.05.004
[7]
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 46, 33-50.
[8]
Kozumi, H., & Kobayashi, G. (2011). Gibbs Sampling Methods for Bayesian Quantile Regression. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 81, 1565-1578.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2010.496117
[9]
Mostafaei, S., Kabir, K., Kazemnejad, A., Feizi, A., Mansourian, M., Keshteli, A. H., Afshar, H., Arzaghi, S. M., Dehkordi, S. R., Adibi, P., & Ghadirian, F. (2019). Explanation of Somatic Symptoms by Mental Health and Personality Traits: Application of Bayesian Regularized Quantile Regression in a Large Population Study. BMC Psychiatry, 19, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2189-1
[10]
Rahman, M. A. (2016). Bayesian Quantile Regression for Ordinal Models. Bayesian Analysis, 11, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1214/15-BA939
[11]
Xu, X., & Chen, L. (2019). Influencing Factors of Disability among the Elderly in China, 2003-2016: Application of Bayesian Quantile Regression. Journal of Medical Economics, 22, 605-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2019.1600525
[12]
Yang, Y., Wang, H. J., & He, X. (2016). Posterior Inference in Bayesian Quantile Regression with Asymmetric Laplace Likelihood. International Statistical Review, 84, 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12114
[13]
Yu, K., & Moyeed, R. A. (2001). Bayesian Quantile Regression. Statistics & Probability Letters, 54, 437-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7152(01)00124-9
[14]
Zhao, Y., & Xu, D. (2023). A Bayesian Variable Selection Method for Spatial Autoregressive Quantile Models. Mathematics, 11, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11040987