全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

次优食品营销利用的国际研究动态
International Research Trends on the Suboptimal Food Marketing Utilization

DOI: 10.12677/SD.2024.142046, PP. 362-377

Keywords: 次优食品,营销利用,研究动态,文献检索,计量分析,减少食物浪费
Suboptimal Food
, Marketing Utilization, Research Trends, Literature Retrieval, Bibliometric Analysis, Reduce Food Waste

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在全球粮食安全危机愈演愈烈的形势下,减少食物浪费问题日益受到国际社会的普遍关注。其中,次优食品利用是一个重要的途径,具有促进社会可持续发展的经济和科学价值。本文通过对2003~2023年间国内外发表的上千篇期刊论文、学位论文等文献的检索阅读和计量分析,揭示了该领域近20年来的国际研究趋势,梳理了次优食品的学术定义,明确了次优食品营销利用所涉及的学科专业领域和主要研究热点。其中,次优食品的学术定义表述为:可安全食用但存在某些缺陷、与同类其他食品相比不太受消费者青睐的食品;它可以按时间、视觉和包装的特性分为三类。该研究领域涵盖了多个学科,美国、意大利和英国的发文量位列前三,其中环境科学占比最高(16.43%),其次是商业、管理和会计等学科。通过文献关键字共现分析,识别出9个主要聚类,包括:1) 食物浪费、2) 可持续性、3) 零售、4) 可持续消费、5) 家庭食物浪费、6) 消费行为、7) 消费者、8) 保质期、9) 次优食物。这些主题的国外文献高引用率,表明其已成为广泛关注的学术焦点。相比之下,国内有关次优食品的学术研究成果尚较少,主要聚焦其中的临期食品,在宏观的营销策略和微观的消费心理研究等方面均存在较多空白和盲区。
In the face of an escalating global food security crisis, the issue of reducing food waste is increasingly attracting the attention of the international community. Among these, the utilization of suboptimal food is an important pathway, with economic and scientific value for promoting sustainable societal development. This paper reveals the international research trends in this field over the past 20 years, from 2003 to 2023, through the retrieval, reading, and bibliometric analysis of thousands of journal articles and dissertations published domestically and abroad. It sorts out the academic definition of suboptimal food, clarifies the disciplinary fields and main research hotspots involved in the marketing utilization of suboptimal food. The academic definition of suboptimal food is described as: food that is safe to eat but has certain defects and is less favored by consumers compared to other similar foods; it can be divided into three categories based on time, visual, and packaging characteristics, namely, temporally suboptimal food, visually suboptimal food, and peripherally suboptimal food. This research field covers multiple disciplines, with the United States, Italy, and the United Kingdom ranking in the top three in terms of the number of papers published, among which environmental science has the highest proportion (16.43%), followed by business, management, and accounting disciplines. Through co-occurrence analysis of literature keywords, nine main clusters are identified, including: 1) food waste, 2) sustainability, 3) retail, 4) sustainable consumption, 5) household food waste, 6) consumer behavior, 7) consumers, 8) shelf life, and 9) suboptimal food. The high citation rate of foreign literature on these topics indicates that they have become widely concerned academic focuses. In contrast, domestic academic research on suboptimal food is still relatively scarce, mainly focusing on near-expiry food, with many gaps and blind spots in macro marketing strategies and micro consumer psychology research.

References

[1]  Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., Van Otterdijk, R. and Meybeck, A. (2011) Global Food Losses and Food Waste.
https://www.fao.org/3/i2697e/i2697e.pdf
[2]  WWF-UK (2021) Driven to Waste: The Global Impact of Food Loss and Waste on Farms.
https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/driven_to_waste___the_global_impact_of_food_loss_and_waste_on_farms.pdf
[3]  UNEP (2021) Food Waste Index Report 2021.
https://www.unep.org/resources/report/unep-food-waste-index-report-2021
[4]  Devin, B. and Richards, C. (2018) Food Waste, Power, and Corporate Social Responsibility in the Australian Food Supply Chain. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 199-210.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3181-z
[5]  Obrador, P. (2020) A Freegan Pop-Up Café: Embedding Critical Hospitalities Into the Curriculum. Hospitality & Society, 10, 87-106.
https://doi.org/10.1386/hosp_00013_1
[6]  Zagorski, J., Reyes, G.A., Prescott, M.P. and Stasiewicz, M.J. (2020) Literature Review Investigating Intersections between US Foodservice Food Recovery and Safety. Resources, Con-servation and Recycling, 168, Article ID: 105304.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105304
[7]  Aschemann-Witzel, J., De Hooge, I., Amani, P., Bech-Larsen, T. and Oostindjer, M. (2015) Consumer-Related Food Waste: Causes and Potential for Action. Sustainability, 7, 6457-6477.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066457
[8]  Lim, S.M., Law, H. and Lee, S.S. (2023) Consumers’ Quality Perception and Acceptance of Suboptimal Food: An Online Survey in Selangor and Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Foods, 12, Article 2824.
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12152824
[9]  Aschemann-Witzel, J., De Hooge, I.E. and Almli, V.L. (2019) Suboptimal Food? Food Waste at the Consumer-Retailer Interface. In: Galanakis, C.M., Ed., Saving Food: Production, Supply Chain, Food Waste and Food Consumption, Academic Press, London, 347-368.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815357-4.00012-2
[10]  Cao, Y. and Miao, L. (2021) Consumer Responses to Suboptimal Food Products. Appetite, 163, Article ID: 105205.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105205
[11]  Neubig, C.M., Roosen, J., Karg, C.A.and Moser, S. (2022) It’s Safe and Healthy! Increasing Consumers’ Willingness to Consume Aging Produce. Food Quality and Preference, 101, Article ID: 104608.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104608
[12]  Raak, N., Symmank, C., Zahn, S., Aschemann-Witzel, J. and Rohm, H. (2017) Processing-And Product-Related Causes for Food Waste and Implications for the Food Supply Chain. Waste Management, 61, 461-472.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.027
[13]  Cao, S., Gong, S. and Bai, L. (2023) Situational Variables That Affect Consumers’ Suboptimal Food Purchasing Behavior in China. British Food Journal, 125, 145-166.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2021-1074
[14]  Loebnitz, N. and Grunert, K.G. (2015) The Effect of Food Shape Abnormality on Purchase Intentions in China. Food Quality and Preference, 40, 24-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.08.005
[15]  Varese, E., Cesarani, M.C. and Wojnarowska, M. (2023) Consumers’ Perception of Suboptimal Food: Strategies to Reduce Food Waste. British Food Journal, 125, 361-378.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2021-0809
[16]  Makhal, A., Thyne, M., Robertson, K. and Mirosa, M. (2020) “I Don’t Like Wonky Carrots”—An Exploration of Children’s Perceptions of Suboptimal Fruits and Vegetables. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, Article ID: 101945.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101945
[17]  Grewal, L., Hmurovic, J., Lamberton, C. and Reczek, R.W. (2019) The Self-Perception Connection: Why Consumers Devalue Unattractive Produce. Journal of Marketing, 83, 89-107.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242918816319
[18]  Koo, M., Oh, H. and Patrick, V.M. (2019) From Oldie to Goldie: Humanizing Old Produce Enhances Its Appeal. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 4, 337-351.
https://doi.org/10.1086/705032
[19]  Symmank, C., Zahn, S. and Rohm, H. (2018) Visually Suboptimal Bananas: How Ripeness Affects Consumer Expectation and Perception. Appetite, 120, 472-481.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.10.002
[20]  Bai, L., Cao, S., Gong, S. and Huang, L. (2022) Motivations and Obstructions of Minimizing Suboptimal Food Waste in Chinese Households. Journal of Cleaner Production, 342, Ar-ticle ID: 130951.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130951
[21]  Aschemann-Witzel, J., Otterbring, T., De Hooge, I.E., Normann, A., Rohm, H., Almli, V.L. and Oostindjer, M. (2019) The Who, Where and Why of Choosing Suboptimal Foods: Consequences for Tackling Food Waste in Store. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, Article ID: 117596.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.071
[22]  De Hooge, I.E., Oostindjer, M., Aschemann-Witzel, J., Normann, A., Loose, S.M. and Almli, V.L. (2017) This Apple Is Too Ugly for Me: Consumer Preferences for Suboptimal Food Products in the Supermarket and at Home. Food Quality and Preference, 56, 80-92.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.09.012
[23]  Aschemann-Witzel, J., Giménez, A. and Ares, G. (2018) Con-sumer In-Store Choice of Suboptimal Food to Avoid Food Waste: The Role of Food Category, Communication and Per-ception of Quality Dimensions. Food Quality and Preference, 68, 29-39.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.01.020
[24]  Giménez, A., Aschemann-Witzel, J. and Ares, G. (2021) Ex-ploring Barriers to Consuming Suboptimal Foods: A Consumer Perspective. Food Research International, 141, Article ID: 110106.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110106
[25]  Sharma, G. (2021) The Makerspace Phenomenon: A Bibliometric Review of Literature (2012-2020). International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 18, Article ID: 2150006.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877021500061
[26]  Caputo, A. and Kargina, M. (2022) A User-Friendly Method to Merge Scopus and Web of Science Data During Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 10, 82-88.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-021-00142-7
[27]  Hartmann, T., Jahnke, B. and Hamm, U. (2021) Making Ugly Food Beautiful: Consumer Barriers to Purchase and Marketing Options for Suboptimal Food at Retail Level—A System-atic Review. Food Quality and Preference, 90, Article ID: 104179.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104179
[28]  Walls, I. (2005) Achieving Continuous Improvement in Re-ductions in Foodborne Listeriosis—A Risk-Based Approach. Journal of Food Protection, 68, 1932-1994.
https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-68.9.1932
[29]  Azam, A., Ahmed, A., Wang, H., Wang, Y. and Zhang, Z. (2021) Knowledge Structure and Research Progress in Wind Power Generation (WPG) from 2005 to 2020 Using CiteSpace Based Scientometric Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, Article ID: 126496.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126496
[30]  Tao, S., Yang, D., Zhang, L., Yu, L., Wang, Z., Li, L., Shao, M., et al. (2022) Knowledge Domain and Emerging Trends in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: A Scientometric Review Based on CiteSpace Analysis. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 9, Article 891428.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.891428
[31]  Ruan, J., Jiang, H., Zhu, C., Hu, X., Shi, Y., Liu, T., Chan, F.T.S., et al. (2019) Agriculture IoT: Emerging Trends, Cooperation Networks, and Outlook. IEEE Wireless Communications, 26, 56-63.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.001.1900096
[32]  Wang, M., Xie, X., Zhao, S., Han, W. and Zhang, Y. (2022) Global Research Trends and Hotspots of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, Article 990800.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.990800
[33]  Green, R. (2014) Harris Farm Markets Embraces Its Imperfections in the Latest Campaign via Workshop Australia.
https://campaignbrief.com/harris-farm-markets-embraces-i/
[34]  Mookerjee, S., Cornil, Y. and Hoegg, J. (2021) From Waste to Taste: How “Ugly” Labels Can Increase Purchase of Unattractive Produce. Journal of Marketing, 85, 62-77.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920988656
[35]  Zhang, Y., Van Herpen, E., Van Loo, E.J., Pandelaere, M. and Geuens, M. (2023) Save Near-Expired Food: Does a Message to Avoid Food Waste Affect Food Purchase and Household Waste Prevention Behaviors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 384, Article ID: 135555.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135555
[36]  Van Giesen, R.I. and De Hooge, I.E. (2019) Too Ugly, But I Love Its Shape: Reducing Food Waste of Suboptimal Products with Authenticity (and Sustainability) Positioning. Food Quality and Preference, 75, 249-259.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.02.020

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133