全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

董事海外经历、绿色技术创新与企业环境绩效
Research on Directors’ Overseas Experience, Green Technology Innovation and Corporate Environmental Performance

DOI: 10.12677/WER.2024.131008, PP. 70-82

Keywords: 海外经历,环境绩效,绿色技术创新,产权性质
Overseas Experience
, Environmental Performance, Green Technology Innovation, Equity Nature

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在我国节能减排新发展形势下,绿色发展越来越成为企业的自觉追求,而这离不开高质量人才的支撑。十八大以来“归国潮”逐渐形成,董事会是企业的重要决策者,探究具有海外经历的董事如何引导企业主动实施环境战略,实现绿色转型是有必要的。本文基于2012~2020年A股上市企业数据,实证检验了董事海外经历与企业环境绩效之间的关系。研究结果表明:当董事会中有海外经历的成员占比越多,越能提高企业的环境绩效;并且董事海外经历是通过促进企业的绿色技术创新活动来提升企业的环境绩效。进一步研究发现,当企业为非国有企业时,董事海外经历对企业环境绩效的正向影响会增强。
Under the new development situation of China’s energy saving and emission reduction, green development has become more and more a conscious pursuit of enterprises, which cannot be separated from the support of high-quality talents. Since the 18th National Congress, the “wave of returning to China” has gradually formed, and the board of directors is an important decision maker of enterprises, it is necessary to explore how directors with overseas experience can guide enterprises to take the initiative to implement environmental strategies and realize green transfor-mation. Based on the data of A-share listed companies from 2012 to 2020, this paper empirically examines the relationship between directors’ overseas experience and corporate environmental performance. The results of the study show that: when the proportion of board members with overseas experience is higher, the more it can improve the environmental performance of the enterprise; and the overseas experience of directors enhances the environmental performance of the enterprise by promoting the enterprise’s green technology innovation activities. It is further found that the positive effect of directors’ overseas experience on corporate environmental performance increases when the firm is a non-state-owned enterprise.

References

[1]  澎湃新闻. 天门化工厂爆炸6死1伤事故初步查明原因: 静电引燃危险物料[EB/OL]. 2020-10-08. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_9485719, 2023-11-27.
[2]  新京报. 伊春鹿鸣矿业尾矿库泄漏事件调查结果公布 相关单位和人员被问责[EB/OL]. 2021-05-21. https://finance.sina.com.cn/jjxw/2021-05-21/doc-ikmxzfmm3823359.shtml, 2023-11-27.
[3]  刘明广. 企业环境绩效与经济绩效的关系研究[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2021(6): 52-56.
[4]  李冬伟, 黄波. 基于PDCA的企业环境绩效评价体系构建[J]. 财会通讯, 2018(20): 68-71+129.
[5]  郑明波. 高管海外经历、专业背景与企业技术创新[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2019, 35(10): 137-144+153.
[6]  曹洪军, 陈泽文. 内外环境对企业绿色创新战略的驱动效应——高管环保意识的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017, 20(6): 95-103.
[7]  沈洪涛, 周艳坤. 环境执法监督与企业环境绩效: 来自环保约谈的准自然实验证据[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017, 20(6): 73-82.
[8]  吕鹏, 黄送钦. 环境规制压力会促进企业转型升级吗[J]. 南开管理评论, 2021, 24(4): 116-129.
[9]  王云, 李延喜, 马壮, 宋金波. 媒体关注、环境规制与企业环保投资[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017, 20(6): 83-94.
[10]  胡珺, 宋献中, 王红建. 非正式制度、家乡认同与企业环境治理[J]. 管理世界, 2017(3): 76-94+187-188.
[11]  Christmann, P. (2000) Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets. Academy of Man-agement Journal, 43, 663-680.
https://doi.org/10.5465/1556360
[12]  Khan, M.K., Zahid, R.M.A., Saleem, A., et al. (2021) Board Composition and Social & Environmental Accountability: A Dynamic Model Analysis of Chinese Firms. Sustainability, 13, Article No. 10662.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910662
[13]  Konadu, R., Ahinful, G.S., Boakye, D.J., et al. (2022) Board Gender Diversity, Environmental Innovation and Corporate Carbon Emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, Article ID: 121279.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121279
[14]  王鸿儒, 陈思丞, 孟天广. 高管公职经历、中央环保督察与企业环境绩效——基于A省企业层级数据的实证分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2021, 18(1): 114-125+173.
[15]  邹海亮, 姜紫含, 帅萍. 董事会连锁关系与环境绩效: 基于社会网络的视角[J]. 华东经济管理, 2018, 32(3): 119-127.
[16]  Zhang, J., Kong, D. and Wu, J. (2018) Doing Good Business by Hiring Directors with Foreign Experi-ence. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 859-876.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3416-z
[17]  沈菲, 陶启智, 张云. 董事海外背景对企业绿色技术创新的影响研究——基于企业声誉的视角[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2022, 24(3): 108-122.
[18]  陈思, 钟凤英. 高管海外经历对农林企业声誉资本的影响——以环境信息透明度的间接效应为例[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2022, 50(5): 136-139.
[19]  刘凤朝, 默佳鑫, 马荣康. 高管团队海外背景对企业创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(7): 135-147.
[20]  崔秀梅, 王敬勇, 王萌. 环保投资、CEO海外经历与企业价值: 增值抑或减值?——基于烙印理论视角的分析[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2021, 36(5): 86-94.
[21]  乔鹏程, 徐祥兵. 管理层海外经历、短视主义与企业创新: 有调节的中介效应[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(19): 78-87.
[22]  李杰义, 张汞, 谢琳娜. 环境知识学习、绿色创新行为与环境绩效[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(15): 122-128.
[23]  Shu, C., Zhou, K.Z., Xiao, Y., et al. (2016) How Green Management Influences Product Innovation in China: The Role of Institutional Benefits. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 471-485.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2401-7
[24]  张增田, 姚振玖, 卢琦, 等. 高管海外经历能促进企业绿色创新吗? [J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(8): 68-82.
[25]  杜兴强, 殷敬伟, 张颖, 杜颖洁. 国际化董事会与企业环境绩效[J]. 会计研究, 2021(10): 84-96.
[26]  伍衡峰. 论国有企业治理文化及其对治理结构的影响[J]. 现代交际, 2010(7): 5-7.
[27]  解学梅, 朱琪玮. 企业绿色创新实践如何破解“和谐共生”难题? [J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(1): 128-149+9.
[28]  李青原, 肖泽华. 异质性环境规制工具与企业绿色创新激励——来自上市企业绿色专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(9): 192-208.
[29]  温忠麟. 张雷, 侯杰泰, 刘红云. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(5): 614-620.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413