全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

盒子建筑舱体连接节点简化分析及整体结构抗震分析
Simplified Analysis of Box Building Connecting Nodes and Overall Structural Seismic Analysis

DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2024.134049, PP. 434-446

Keywords: 节点简化,有限元计算模型,地震反应谱分析,抗震性能
Nodal Simplification
, Finite Element Calculation Model, Seismic Response Spectrum Analysis, Seismic Performance

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:对盒子建筑舱体连接节点进行简化分析,将简化结果应用于某多层盒子模块化装配式学生公寓,并对该结构进行整体抗震分析。方法:应用有限元软件ABAQUS建立节点有限元实体模型与简化模型,分析在柱顶施加0.2轴压比的轴压力及150 mm水平位移作用下,比较两种模型的破坏形态及荷载位移曲线。采用MIDASGEN2022建立整体结构计算模型,对其进行地震反应谱分析,并将计算结果与现行国家标准限值进行对比。结果:有限元简化模型与实体模型应力分布规律一致,破坏形态相同,二者破坏形态均为模块梁屈服,梁端发生塑性铰破坏,且两种模型的荷载位移曲线较为接近,二者的初始刚度、屈服荷载和极限荷载相差不大。反应谱分析结果均满足国家标准限值要求。结论:简化模型与实体模型破坏形态相同,荷载位移曲线接近,验证了简化模型的合理性。盒子模块结构设置刚性支撑,可较大提升整体结构的抗侧刚度。
Purpose: Simplified analysis of the connecting nodes of box building compartments is carried out, the node simplification results are applied to a multi-story box modular assembly student apartment, and the overall seismic analysis of the structure is carried out. Methods: The finite element software ABAQUS is applied to establish the node finite element solid model and the simplified model, and analyze the damage patterns and load displacement curves comparing the two models under the axial pressure of 0.2 axial compression ratio applied at the top of the columns and the horizontal displacement of 150 mm. MIDAS/gen 2022 is used to establish the calculation model of the whole structure, the seismic response spectrum analysis is carried out, and the calculation results are compared with the limits of the current national standards. Results: The stress distribution pattern of the simplified finite element model and the solid model are consistent, and the damage patterns are the same, the damage pattern of both models is the yielding of the modular beam, and the plastic hinge damage occurs at the end of the beam, and the load displacement curves of the two models are close to each other, and the differences in initial stiffness, yield load and ultimate load are not big between the two models. The results of reaction spectrum analysis meet the requirements of national standard limits. Conclusion: The simplified model has the same damage pattern as the solid model, and the load-displacement curves are close to each other, which verifies the rationality of the simplified model. Setting rigid support for the box module structure can greatly improve the lateral stiffness of the overall structure.

References

[1]  陈敖宜, 张肇毅, 王卉, 等. 建筑工业化与绿色模块建筑[J]. 建筑结构, 2013, 43(S2): 334-336.
[2]  国务院办公厅关于大力发展装配式建筑的指导意见[J]. 建筑技术开发, 2017, 44(1): 80.
[3]  赵建安, 钟帅, 沈镭. 中国主要耗能行业技术进步对节能减排的影响与展望[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(12): 2211-2222.
[4]  王文静, 李志武, 于春义, 刘洋, 叶浩文, 李振宝. 模块化钢结构建筑结构体系研究进展[J]. 施工技术, 2020, 49(11): 24-30, 36.
[5]  黄馨仪, 舒展, 李征. 装配式模块化建筑与模块节点研究进展[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2022, 24(2): 40-49.
[6]  Chen, Z., Li, H., Chen, A., et al. (2017) Research Onpretensioned Modular Frame Test and Simulations. Engineering Structures, 151, 774-787.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.019
[7]  Yu, Y., Chen, Z. and Chen, A. (2019) Experimental Study of a Pretensioned Connection for Modular Buildings. Steel and Composite Structures, 31, 217-232.
[8]  Dhanapal, J., Ghaednia, H., Das, S., et al. (2019) Structural Performance of State-of-the-Art VectorBloc Modular Connector under Axial Loads. Engineering Structures, 183, 496-509.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.023
[9]  Dhanapal, J., Ghaednia, H., Das, S. and Velocci, J. (2020) Behavior of Thin-Walled Beam-Column Modular Connection Subject to Bending Load. Thin-Walled Structures, 149, Article ID: 106536.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.106536
[10]  戴骁蒙. 模块化钢结构插入自锁式节点抗震性能与设计方法研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 天津: 天津大学, 2019.
[11]  刘洋. 角件旋转式节点连接的柱承重式钢模块结构抗震性能研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 天津: 天津大学, 2021.
[12]  Chen, Z.H., Liu, Y., Zhong, X. and Liu, J.D. (2019) Rotational Stiffness of Inter-Module Connection in Mid-Rise Modular Steel Buildings. Engineering Structures, 196, Article ID: 109273.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.06.009
[13]  周子栋. 多层钢模块建筑结构性能与角件旋转式模块连接节点分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 天津大学, 2018.
[14]  丛子怡. 钢结构模块角件旋转式连接节点力学性能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 天津大学, 2019.
[15]  Lee, S.S., Park, K.S., Hong, S.Y., et al. (2015) Behavior of C-Shaped Beam to Square Hollow Section Column Connection in Modular Frame. Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction, 27, 471-481.
https://doi.org/10.7781/kjoss.2015.27.5.471
[16]  Choi, K.S. and Kim, H.J. (2015) An Analytical Study on Rotational Capacity of Beam-Column Joints in Unit Modular Frames. International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 9, 100-103.
[17]  Choi, K.S., Lee, H.C. and Kim, H.J. (2016) Influence of Analytical Models on the Seismic Response of Modular Structures. Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 20, 74-85.
https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2016.20.2.074
[18]  Nadeem, G., Safiee, N.A., Abu, B.N., Abd, K.I. and Mohd, N.N.A. (2021) Finite Element Analysis of Proposed Self-Locking Joint for Modular Steel Structures. Applied Sciences, 11, Article 9277.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199277
[19]  邓恩峰. 集成模块钢结构波纹钢板剪力墙与新型节点抗震性能研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 天津: 天津大学, 2018.
[20]  邓恩峰, 宗亮, 丁阳. 钢结构集成模块建筑新型节点力学性能研究[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2018, 51(7): 702-710.
[21]  中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震设计规范(GB50011-2010) [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
[22]  中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑结构荷载规范(GB50009-2012) [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413