全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Conformity Assessment of Lead Aprons Used in Conventional Radiology: A Multi-Centre Survey in Togo

DOI: 10.4236/ojrad.2024.142006, PP. 55-63

Keywords: Lead Apron, Compliance, Radiation Protection, Radiology, Togo

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Aim: Lead aprons are used to protect against scattered radiation from the patient during interventional procedures and certain special conventional radiological examinations. Given the importance of the role lead aprons are supposed to play in radiation protection, we propose to assess their conformity in medical imaging departments in public and religious hospitals in Togo. Materials and method: A multi-centre survey conducted from 26 November to 06 December 2021 in the radiology departments of public and religious health facilities in Togo. All aprons in use were included. The evaluation criteria were physical (visual), quantitative (radiographic) and qualitative (dosimetric). Results: We had registred 43 aprons among wich 27 (62.79%) leaded aprons were labelled non-compliant and 16 (37.21%) were labelled compliant. Of the aprons judged to be non-compliant, 70.37% were more than 10 years old and 96.30% showed defects on the radiographic images. The most common defects were vampire marks (18.64%), multiple folds (16.96%), cracks (16.96%), multiple cracks (15.25%), tears (8.47%), absence of lead (5.08%), holes (3.39%) and lead corrosion (1.69%). Defective aprons (62.96%) had at least two defects. The defects were of thoraco-abdomino-pelvic (74.07%), thoracic (14.82%) and abdomino-pelvic (11.11%) topography. For indirect exposure at 50 and 70 kilovolts, all the aprons had an attenuation factor greater than 90%. After dosimetric measurement, 13.95% of aprons had attenuation factors below 90% for indirect exposure at 100 kilovolts. Conclusion: The compliance of the leaded decks is trifactorial (physical, radiographic and dosimetric). However, there is no significant difference in X-ray attenuation capacity between defective and normal decks.

References

[1]  Omer, K., Djakouri, K., Agbo, D., Huberson, G., Alain, M. and Koua, A. (2021) Interventional Radiology in Côte d’Ivoire: Analysis and Assessment of the Radiological Risk of the Surgical Team. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 11, 216-229.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2021.112015
[2]  Hubbert, T.E., Vucich, J.J. and Armstrong, M.R. (1993) Lightweight Aprons for Protection against Scattered Radiation during Fluoroscopy. American Journal of Roentgenology, 161, 1079-1081.
https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.161.5.8273614
[3]  Lambert, K. and McKeon, T. (2001) Inspection of Lead Aprons: Criteria for Rejection. Health Physics, 80, 67-69.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-200105001-00008
[4]  Leonie, M., Harald, O., Gudran, I. and Fiona, W. (2004) Basic Radiation Protection for Everyday Use, How to Achieve ALARA: Working Tips and Guidelines. World Health Organization.
[5]  Ukpong, E.V., Eduwem, D.U., Efanga, I., Esien-Umo, E. and James, N.A. (2010) An Assessment of the Lead Rubber Aprons in Radiodiagnostic Centres in South-South Nigeria. Journal of Association of Radiographers of Nigeria, 24, 1-7.
https://doi.org/10.48153/jrrs/2010/YAWT6262
[6]  Oyar, O. and Kışlalıoğlu, A. (2012) How Protective Are the Lead Aprons We Use against Ionizing Radiation? Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 18, 147-152.
https://doi.org/10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.4526-11.1
[7]  Mori, H., Koshida, K., Ishigamori, O. and Matshubara, K. (2014) Evaluation of Effectiveness of X-Ray Protective Aprons in Experimental and Practical Field. Radiological Physics and Technology, 7, 158-166.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-013-0246-x
[8]  Ryu Sung, J., Baek, S.W., Jung, C.H., Cho, S.J., Jung Gene, E., Kim Kyoung, H. and Kim Hun, J. (2013) The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room. The Korean Journal of Pain, 26, 142-147.
https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.2.142
[9]  Leclet, H. and Madoux, M. (2012) Guide pratique de radioprotection en radiologie médicale, 100 fiches techniques pour comprendre et agir. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier.
[10]  Christodoulou, E.G., Goodsitt, M.M., Larson, S.C., Darner, K.L., Satti, J. and Chan, H.P. (2003) Evaluation of the Transmitted Exposure through Lead Equivalent Aprons Used in a Radiology Department, Including the Contribution from Backscatter. Medical Physics, 30, 1033-1038.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1573207
[11]  Glaze, S., LeBlanc, A.D. and Bushong, S.C. (1984) Defects in New Protective Aprons. Radiology, 152, 217-218.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.152.1.6729117

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133