The focus of this investigation is upon the extent to which experimental Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) studies have been concerned with advanced-level second/foreign language acquisition (AL2) and in what ways, if any, the exploitation and outcomes of MALL for AL2 differs from its application at non-advanced-levels. Consistent with the marginal status of advanced-level language learning in classroom practice, AL2 has very much been on the fringes of experimental MALL studies. Although MALL has been the subject of more than 5500 studies over the past three decades, little more than a quarter of this massive output describes experimental research, and of this very little has targeted AL2. In fact, of the 1470 experimental MALL studies appearing between 1994-2023 that were consulted for this inquiry, AL2 accounts for only 69, i.e., less than 5% of the total. These experimental AL2 MALL studies are notable for their atheoretical nature, small sample sizes and short treatment durations. Likewise, they are resolutely concentrated on vocabulary acquisition. So, too, tutorial exercises are the most frequent activity type. Not surprisingly, such activities rarely involve collaborative interaction. Moreover, whatever the activity type, individual engagement accounts for the great majority of experimental AL2 MALL. Communicative language learning undertakings are very much the exception. As far as language learning outcomes are concerned, overall, experimental AL2 MALL studies result in substantially fewer unequivocally positive results than do MALL studies that do not specifically target advanced-level learners. Despite their shortcomings, experimental MALL treatments are held in very high regard by participants, AL2 groups no less so than non-advanced-level ones.
References
[1]
Abdous, M., Camarena, M., & Facer, B. (2009). MALL Technology: Use of Academic Podcasting in the Foreign Language Classroom. ReCALLJournal, 21, 76-95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000020
[2]
Burston, J. (2015). 20 Years of MALL Project Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Learning Outcomes. ReCALL Journal, 27, 4-20. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/recall/article/abs/twenty-years-of-mall-project-implementation-a-metaanalysis-of-learning-outcomes/EE135E77EB10AD5DB8D1FA3F2CCC9317
[3]
Burston, J. (2021). General MALL Bibliography 1994-2020. Academia.com https://www.academia.edu/95845387/General_MALL_Bibliography_1994_2020
[4]
Burston, J., & Athanasiou, A. (2020). Twenty-Five Years of MALL Experimental Implementation Studies—What Do We Really Know About It? In A. Andujar (Ed.), RecentToolsforComputer-andMobile-AssistedForeignLanguageLearning (pp. 35-60). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1097-1.ch002
[5]
Burston, J., & Giannakou, K. (2021). MALL Language Learning Outcomes: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 1994-2019. ReCALLJournal, 34, 147-168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000240
[6]
Chwo, G., Marek, M., & Wu, V. (2018). Meta-Analysis of MALL Research and Design. System, 74, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.02.009
[7]
Clark, R., & Sugrue, B. (1991). Research on Instructional Media. In G. Anglin (Ed.), InstructionalTechnology: Past, Present, and Future(pp. 327-343). Libraries Unlimited.
[8]
Creswell, J. (2014). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
[9]
Elgort, I. (2018). Technology-Mediated Second Language Vocabulary Development: A Review of Trends in Research Methodology. CALICOJournal, 35, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.34554
[10]
Glisan, E., Swender, E., & Surface, E. (2013). Oral Proficiency Standards and Foreign Language Teacher Candidates: Current Findings and Future Research Directions. ForeignLanguageAnnals, 46, 264-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12030
[11]
Kissau, S. (2014). The Impact of the Oral Proficiency Interview on One Foreign Language Teacher Education Program. ForeignLanguageAnnals, 47, 527-545. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12092
[12]
Lee, S.-M. (2022). A Systematic Review of Context-Aware Technology Use in Foreign Language Learning. ComputerAssistedLanguageLearning, 35, 294-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1688836
[13]
Lusin, N., Peterson, T., Sulewski, C., & Zafer, R. (2023). Enrollments in Languages Other Than English in US Institutions of Higher Education, Fall 2021. Modern Language Association of America.
[14]
Shadiev, R., Liu, T., & Hwang, W.-Y. (2020). Review of Research on Mobile-Assisted Language Learning in Familiar, Authentic Environments. BritishJournalofEducationalTechnology, 51, 709-720. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12839
[15]
Uther, M., Zipitria I., Uther J., & Singh, P. (2005). Mobile Adaptive CALL (MAC): A Case-Study in Developing a Mobile Learning Application for Speech/Audio Language Training. In Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, IEEE InternationalWorkshop (pp. 187-191). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WMTE.2005.46
[16]
Viberg, O., & Grönlund, Å. (2012). Mobile Assisted Language Learning: A Literature Review. In Proceedings11thWorldConferenceonMobileandContextualLearning (pp. 1-8).
[17]
Weschler, R., & Pitts, C. (1999). CALL to PEDAL: From Computer Assisted Language Learning to Portable Electronic Devices for Autonomous Learning. JournaloftheKyoritsuWomen’sUniversityDepartmentofInternationalStudies, 16, 20-40.