Background: We currently have international and national guidelines regarding the assessment and monitoring of clinical signs and humane endpoints in animals used in teaching and research, which make the performance of these activities mandatory for any experiment and professional working in this area. Assigning the severity of a research experiment is the result of an analysis of records of observations of the animal’s behavior, and clinical signs. The aim of this study was to describe the importance of carrying out a severity assessment associated with clinical and behavioral monitoring of rodents and rabbits during experimentation to maintain the welfare of these animals undergoing scientific research. Methods:The literature search was carried out using the following terms: “Monitoring”; “Humane endpoints”; “Animal welfare”, “Rodents”; “Rabbits”, and as connectors “and”; “or”, in the following databases: PubMed; LILACS/BIREME and SciELO. Results: A total of 987 articles were identified in the databases, and 20 of these studies were included in this review. Conclusions: Humane endpoint protocols and procedure severity tables are of the utmost importance, both from an ethical point and to refine the results of research conducted on laboratory animals. They should be drawn up jointly by the teams responsible for the project and the maintenance of the animals during the research period, and the data obtained should be published so that the scientific community can have access to it, helping to disseminate these practices, as well as helping to draw up new procedures. Monitoring and evaluating the welfare and clinical condition of animals undergoing scientific research procedures is the responsibility of the professors, researchers, veterinarians, and animal facility coordinators. The Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals must monitor all the activities conducted with the animals, by inspecting the experimental procedures and the physical environment of the laboratory animal facility where the animals are housed.
References
[1]
Riviera, E.A.B. (2017) Welfare of Laboratory Animals. In: Lapchik, V.B.V., Mattaraia, V.G.M. and Ko, G.M., Eds., Care and Management of Laboratory Animals, 2nd Edition, Ateneu, Rio de Janeiro, 35-45. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4020-2271-5
[2]
Russell, W.M.S. and Burch, R.L. (1959) The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Methuen & Company, London.
[3]
Fischer, M.L., Farias, M.K. and Carrano, E. (2020) The Inclusion of Field Research in the Brazilian Guidelines for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific and Teaching Purposes. Revista Conexão Ciência, 15, 7-20.
[4]
Braga, L.M.G.M. and Pitrez, P.M.C. (2010) Animals in Research and Teaching: Ethical and Technical Aspects. XII Salão de Iniciação Científica-PUCRS, 3-7 de outubro de 2011, 173. https://editora.pucrs.br/anais/seminarioic/20112/3/1/1.pdf
[5]
Tenter, A.M., Heckeroth, A.R. and Weiss, L.M. (2000) Toxoplasma gondii: From Animals to Humans. International Journal for Parasitology, 30, 1217-1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00124-7
[6]
Flecknell, P. (2002) Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement. Altex, 19, 73-78. https://altex.org/index.php/altex/issue/view/66?iid=65&aid=5
[7]
Directive 2010/63/EU. European Union. On the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes. Working Document on a Severity Assessment Framework. Brussels, July 11-12, 2012. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/pdf/guidance/severity/en.pdf
[8]
National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation (2023) Brazilian Guide to the Production, Maintenance or Use of Animals for Teaching Activities or Scientific Research. CONCEA, Brasília. https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/composicao/conselhos/concea/arquivos/arquivo/publicacoes-do-concea/guia_concea_1ed_animais-_ensino_ou_pesquisa_2023.pdf
[9]
Cavalcanti, P.V. (2024) Guide for the Implementation of the CEUA/UNIFESP. Humanitarian End Point. 2nd Edition, UNIFESP, São Paulo. https://ceua.unifesp.br/images/documentos/CEUA/Guia_EndPoint_CEUA_UNIFESP_2024.pdf
[10]
Leach, M.C., Thornton, P.D. and Main, D.C.J. (2008) Identification of Appropriate Measures for the Assessment of Laboratory Mouse Welfare. Animal Welfare, 17, 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600027676 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233521726_Identification_of_appropriate_measures_for_the_assessment_of_laboratory_mouse_welfare
[11]
Vlissingen, J.M.F., Borrens, M., Girod, A., Lelovas, P., Morrison, F. and Torres, Y.S. (2015) The Reporting of Clinical Signs in Laboratory Animals: Relatório do Grupo de Trabalho da FELASA. Laboratory Animals, 49, 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677215584249
[12]
Hawkins, P., Playle, L., Golledge, H., Leach, M., Banzett, R., Coenen, A., Cooper, J., Danneman, P., Flecknell, P., Kirckden, R., Niel, L. and Raj, M. (2006) Consensus Meeting on Carbon Dioxide Euthanasia of Laboratory Animals. https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Events/First Newcastle consensus meeting report.pdf
[13]
National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA) (2018) Guidelines for the Practice of Euthanasia. Normative Resolution No. 37 of February 15. https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/composicao/conselhos/concea/arquivos/arquivo/legislacao/anexo-da-resolucao-normativa-no-37-de-15-de-fevereiro-de-2018.pdf
[14]
Olfert, E.D. and Godson, D.L. (2000) Humane Endpoints for Infectious Disease Animal Models. IIAR Journal, 41, 99-104. https://academic.oup.com/ilarjournal/article/41/2/99/749074?login=false https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.41.2.99
[15]
Morton, D. (2000) A Systematic Approach for Establishing Humane Endpoints. ILAR Journal, 41, 80-86. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11406701/ https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.41.2.80
[16]
Langford, D., Bailey, A., Chanda, M., et al. (2010) Coding of Facial Expressions of Pain in the Laboratory Mouse. Nature Methods, 7, 447-449. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1455
[17]
Sotocina, S.G., Sorge, R.E., Zaloum, A., et al. (2011) The Rat Grimace Scale: A Partially Automated Method for Quantifying Pain in the Laboratory Rat via Facial Expressions. Molecular Pain, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-7-55
[18]
Keating, S.C.J., Thomas, A.A., Flecknell, P.A. and Leach, M.C. (2012) Evaluation of EMLA Cream for Preventing Pain during Tattooing of Rabbits: Changes in Physio-Logical, Behavioural and Facial Expression Responses. PLOS ONE, 7, e44437. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044437
[19]
Cardoso, C.V.P. (2002) Laboratory Animals; Breeding and Experimentation. Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, 57 p. https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/37618
[20]
Silva, K.S.M. and Lima, M.R. (2023) Guide to Humane Termination Applied to Rodents Used in Research/Organizers Klena Sarges Marrvaz da Silva, Monique Ribeiro de Lima. Atena, Ponta Grossa. https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.824231008
[21]
Dos Santos, I.B. (2023) Polyclonal Serum Production. In: Guide to Humane Termination Applied to Rodents Used in Research/Organizers Klena Sarges Marrvaz da Silva, Monique Ribeiro de Lima, Atena, Ponta Grossa, 104-115.
[22]
National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA) (2022) Updates the Text of the Brazilian Guidelines for the Care and Use of Animals in Teaching or Scientific Research Activities-DBCA. Normative Resolution No. 55, of October 5. https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/resolucao-n-55-de-5-de-outubro-de-2022-434869177
[23]
Marques, R.G., Marcelo, M.M. and Petroianu, A. (2014) Brazilian Law for Scientific Use of Animals. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, 24, 2009-2069. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19169547/ https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502009000100015
