全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Impression Materials Used in Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Study within Private Practice Dentists in Casablanca, Morocco

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1111820, PP. 1-8

Keywords: Dental Impression, Dentist, Fixed Prosthodontics, Impression Tray, Preliminary Impression

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background: To achieve a fixed prosthesis that is well integrated into the oral environment, the impression for a fixed prosthesis must precisely reproduce the appropriate dental preparation and the sulcular region. To obtain an accurate impression, impression materials and auxiliary equipment must be chosen carefully according to clinical conditions. The aim of this article was to determine the various impression materials and the factors influencing their choice, the types of impression trays, as well as the practice of decontaminating impressions by private sector dentists in Casablanca, Morocco. Methods: A descriptive epidemiological cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of about 5 months from October 2022 to March 2023 using a questionnaire distributed to 262 dentists. Results: The most used impression materials were condensation cured silicone (68.7%) followed by addition cured silicone (65.6%). The most used type of impression tray was the perforated tray (88.5%), followed by the metal tray (78.6%). Regarding the practice of impression decontamination, decontamination before sending to the dental technician was 91.2%, with dentists always performing decontamination in 71.1% of cases, the most used decontaminant being water (65.4%). Conclusion: This study determined the different impression materials frequently used in fixed prosthetics, as well as the criteria for their choice, the type of impression tray required, and the type of impression decontaminant used by private-sector dentists in Casablanca.

References

[1]  Anusavice, K.J. (2006) Philips Science of Dental Materials. 11th Edition, Else-vier.
[2]  Alammari, M.R. (2018) Evaluation of the Functional Impression Tech-nique with Various Impression Materials on the Surface Topography of Dental Stone Casts and Their Effect on Retention. Open Journal of Stomatology, 8, 258-270. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2018.87024
[3]  Pathak, B., Dahal, S. and Khapung, A. (2021) Survey of Impression Materials and Techniques Used in Fixed Prosthodontics among Nepalese Dentists. Nepal Medical College Journal, 23, 308-314. https://doi.org/10.3126/nmcj.v23i4.42217
[4]  Mohamed, A.B. and Abu-Bakr, N.H. (2010) Assessment of Crown and Bridge Work Quality among Sudanese Dental Practitioners. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 10, 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-010-0009-x
[5]  Alharbi, S.A. (2022) The Knowledge and Practice of Fixed Prosthodontics: A Survey among Saudi Arabian Dental Practitioners. Bahreïn Med Bull, 44, 781-785.
[6]  Petitjean, Y. and Schittly, J. (1994) Les Empreintes en prothèse fixées.
[7]  Kisumbi, B.K., Simila, H.O., Osiro, O.A. and Omondi, B.I. (2017) Selection of Impression Materials and Techniques Employed by Dentists in Kenya. East African Medical Journal, 94, 1040-1051.
[8]  Rajasimhan, N.V., Jayaraman, S., Ali, D.J. and Subramanian, B. (2019) Evaluation of Cytotoxicity Levels of Poly Vinyl Ether Silicone, Polyether, and Poly Vinyl Siloxane Impression Materials: An in Vitro Study. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 19, 332-337. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_261_19
[9]  Kouame, K.A., Kone, T., Pesson, D.M., Didia, E.L., Konate, N.Y. and Djeredou, K.B. (2014) Choix des matériaux d’empreinte en pratique quotidienne: Enquête auprès des chirurgien dentistes de la ville d’Abidjan. Revue du Collège d’Odonto-Stomatologie Africain de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, 21, 24-30.
[10]  Bugugnani, R. (1979) Les empreintes en prothèse conjointe: Stratégies cliniques, Traitements de laboratoire. Editions Cahiers de Prothèse.
[11]  O’Brien, W.J. (2002) Dental Materials and Their Selection. 3rd Edition, Quintessence Publishing.
[12]  Burdairon, G. (1990) Abrégé de biomatériaux dentaires. Masson.
[13]  Berteretche, M.V. (1999) Prothèses et matériaux d’empreintes. Dossiers de l’ADF, Association Dentaire Française.
[14]  Ansari, A., Alsaidan, M., Algadhi, S., Alrasheed, M., Al Talib, I., Alsaaid, A., et al. (2021) Impression Materials and Techniques Used in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Questionnaire-Based Survey to Evaluate the Knowledge and Practice of Dental Students in Riyadh City. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 10, 514-520. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2094_20
[15]  Fournier, P., Dot, D. and Six, N. (2009) Contaminations croisées et empreintes. Odonto-stomatol, 38, Article 157.
[16]  Moussaoui, H., Al Jalil, Z., Echajia, L., Gnaoui, N. and El Mesbahi, N. (2024) Quality and Means of Communication between Dentists and Laboratory Technicians in Fixed Prosthesis: A Study Within Prosthetic Dental Technicians in Casablanca, Morocco. Open Access Library Journal, 11, e11359. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111359
[17]  Sedky, N.A. (2014) Evaluation of Practice of Cross Infection Control for Dental Impressions among Laboratory Technicians and Prosthodontists in KSA. International Journal of Infection Control, 10, 1-12.
[18]  Alhoumaidan, A., Mohan, M.P. and Doumani, M. (2019) The Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Fixed Prosthodontics: A Survey among Qassim Dental Practitioners. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 8, 2882-2887. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_683_19

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413