全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

川北通南巴地区须家河组储层孔隙度下限研究
Research on the Porosity Cutoff in the Xujiahe Formation in Tongnanba Area of Northern Sichuan Basin

DOI: 10.12677/jogt.2024.462019, PP. 150-158

Keywords: 孔隙度下限,致密碎屑岩,须家河组,通南巴地区,川北
Porosity Cutoff
, Dense Clastic Rock, Xujiahe Formation, Tongnanba Area, Northern Sichuan

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

四川盆地北部通南巴地区须家河组致密碎屑岩储层孔隙度下限原为3.5%,随着勘探开发的持续深入和水力压裂等工艺技术的进步,原孔隙度下限略显滞后于当前勘探开发水平,一定程度上制约了气田增储上产工作。基于岩心分析、测井、地质、测试等多种资料,采用采用经验统计法、孔渗关系法、分布函数交会法、试气法、类比法(邻区经验借鉴)等方法,开展了通南巴地区须家河组储层物性下限的重新确定工作,通过上述多种方法综合确定了通南巴地区须家河组致密砂岩类储层孔隙度下限为3.0%,须家河组储层孔隙度下限的重新探讨和厘定对于后续气藏储量评估和提交以及开发生产具有重要意义。
The porosity cutoff in the tight clastic reservoir of the Xujiahe Formation in the Tongnanba area of the northern Sichuan Basin was originally 3.5%. With the continuous deepening of exploration and development and the advancement of hydraulic fracturing and other technology, to some extent, the porosity cutoff is slightly lagging behind the current level of gasfield exploration and development, which restricts the work of increasing gas field storage and production. Based on various data such as core analysis, logging, geology, and testing, and using methods such as empirical statistics, pore permeability relationship, distribution function intersection, gas testing, and analogy (referring to neighboring area experience), the cutoff of reservoir physical properties in the Xujiahe Formation in the Tongnanba area was redefined. Through the above methods, the porosity cutoff in the tight sandstone reservoir of the Xujiahe Formation in the Tongnanba area was comprehensively determined to be 3.0%, The re-determination of the porosity cutoff in the Xujiahe Formation reservoir is of great significance for subsequent gas reservoir reserve evaluation, submission, and development and production.

References

[1]  孙海涛, 钟大康, 王威, 等. 四川盆地通南巴地区上三叠统须家河组致密砂岩储层成因分析[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(5): 1057-1067.
[2]  王威, 凡睿, 黎承银, 等. 川东北地区须家河组“断缝体”气藏有利勘探目标和预测技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(4): 992-1001.
[3]  戚厚发. 天然气储层物性下限及深层气勘探问题的探讨[J]. 天然气工业, 1989, 9(5): 26-30, 7.
[4]  李幸运, 郭建新, 张清秀, 等. 气藏储集层物性参数下限确定方法研究[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2008, 31(3): 33-38.
[5]  白工, 黄德明, 刘欣, 等. 川东北超致密砂岩气田储层物性下限确定方法[J]. 天然气技术与经济, 2013, 7(5): 23-25+78.
[6]  李烨, 司马立强, 闫建平, 等. 低孔、低渗致密砂岩储层物性下限值的确定——以川中P地区须二段气藏为例[J].天然气工业, 2014, 34(4): 52-56.
[7]  盘昌林, 刘树根, 马永生, 等. 川东北须家河组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(3): 27-34.
[8]  宋钰, 张莉, 罗丁文, 等. 四川盆地元坝-通南巴地区须家河组致密砂岩封隔型超压系统压力结构特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(5): 613-620.
[9]  王爱. 多期次构造运动影响下不同物源成分砂岩致密化机理探讨[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2019.
[10]  魏小薇, 谢继容, 唐大海, 等. 低孔渗砂岩储层基质物性下限确定方法研究——以川中LA构造沙一段油藏为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2005(S1): 28-31, 11.
[11]  路智勇, 韩学辉, 张欣, 等. 储层物性下限确定方法的研究现状与展望[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(5): 32-42.
[12]  黎菁, 赵峰, 刘鹏. 苏里格气田东区致密砂岩气藏储层物性下限值的确定[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(6): 31-35.
[13]  万玲, 孙岩, 魏国齐. 确定储集层物性参数下限的一种新方法及其应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地中部气田为例[J]. 沉积学报, 1999, 17(3): 454-457.
[14]  邵长新, 王艳忠, 操应长. 确定有效储层物性下限的两种新方法及应用——以东营凹陷古近系深部碎屑岩储层为例[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2008, 30(2): 414-416.
[15]  段亚男, 潘保芝, 庄华, 等. 苏里格气田致密砂岩储层物性下限值的研究[J]. 世界地质, 2014, 33(4): 861-866.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413