Disability representation in Bangladeshi film is a multifaceted and often contentious subject, serving both as a mirror reflecting societal beliefs and a lens through which cultural myths are disseminated. Drawing insights from the social model of disability and Ronald Barthes’ concept of myth, this paper examines the portrayals of disability in Bangladeshi films over the past three decades. Through a content analysis of three films on disability, Shuva (2006), Ostitto (2016), and Raat Jaga Phool (2021), the discussion elucidates how disability is often mythologized, serving as a plot device, a form of punishment, or a metaphor for passive heroism and comedic relief. Thus, it reveals significant distortions that strengthen societal prejudices of labelling disabled people as “other” and hinder their inclusion in mainstream society. Furthermore, gender roles within a patriarchal society are explored, highlighting how disabled female protagonists are marginalized and confined to roles of dependency and pity. The paper also critiques the romanticization and misunderstanding surrounding disability treatment and remedies portrayed in Bangladeshi films that establish able-bodied norms and overshadow the agency of disabled individuals. Therefore, it calls for a more authentic and inclusive representation of disability in Bangladeshi films.
References
[1]
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies: Ronald Barthes. Hill and Wang.
[2]
Bhugra, D. (2006). Mad Tales from Bollywood Portrayal of Mental Illness in Conventional Hindi Cinema. Psychology Press.
[3]
Boray, S. (2011). Depiction of Disabilities in Movies: Disability Portrayal in the Media through the Eyes of Bollywood and Hollywood. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1943108 https://ssrn.com/abstract=1943108
[4]
Brylla, C. (2018). The Benefits of Content Analysis for Filmmakers. Studies in Australian Cinema, 12, 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503175.2018.1540097
[5]
Conn, R., & Bhugra, D. (2012). The Portrayal of Autism in Hollywood Films. International Journal of Culture and Mental Health, 5, 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2011.553369
[6]
Fiske, J., & Hartley, J. (1978). Reading Television. Methuen.
[7]
Foucault, M. (2006). History of Madness (J. Murphy and J. Khalfa, Trans.). Routledge.
[8]
Gilman, S. L. (1988). Disease and Representation: Images of Illness from Madness to AIDS. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501745805
[9]
Halder, D. (n.d.). Deconstructing Motherhood in Indian Cinema: A Critical Feminist Discourse. https://www.academia.edu/34723994/Deconstructing_Motherhood_in_Indian_Cinema_docx
[10]
Hughes, Dr. R. (2010). The Social Model of Disability. British Journal of Healthcare Assistants, 4, 508-511. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjha.2010.4.10.79078
[11]
Hunt, J. (2020). Freaks and Freakery in Film and History. SFRA Review, 50, 54-58. https://sfrareview.org/2020/07/10/50-1-a6hunt/
[12]
Hussain, M. M. (2021). Social Exclusion of People with Disability in Bangladesh: Dimensions and Challenges. Asian Social Work Journal (ASWJ), 6, 12-21. https://doi.org/10.47405/aswj.v6i1.161
[13]
Islam, C. N. (2006). Shuva [Film]. Impress Telefilm Limited.
[14]
Islam, K. S. (2010). The Myth of the Mad “Other” in Hindi Cinema.The Dhaka University Studies, 67, 221-232.
[15]
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (W. Moore & P. Cammack, Trans.). Verso.
[16]
Lee, H. (1960). To Kill a Mockingbird. HarperCollins Publisher.
[17]
Longmore, P. K. (1985). Screening Stereotypes: Images of Disabled People. In C. R. Smith, & A. Enns (Eds.), Screening Disability: Essays on Cinema and Disability (pp. 1-18). University Press of America.
[18]
Longmore, P. K. (2003). Why I Burned My Book and Other Essays on Disability. Temple University Press.
[19]
Mamun, A. (2016). Ostitto [Film]. Dream Box Ltd.
[20]
Masasa, T. L. (2002). Cultural Belief towards Disability: Their Influence on Rehabilitation. Master’s Thesis, University of Stellenbosch.
[21]
Meyers, C. (1992). Hmong Children and Their Families: Consideration of Cultural Influence in Assessment. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 737-744. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.46.8.737
[22]
Miller, L. (1987). Classification of Psychopathology According to a Scientific (Psychology and Psychiatry) and an Artistic (Film Noir) Perspective. Psychological Reports, 61, 287-299. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1987.61.1.287
[23]
O’Dell, E. J. (2015). From Leprosy to the Willow Tree: Decoding Disability and Islamic Spiritualty in Iranian Film. Disability & Society, 30, 1123-1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1070542
[24]
O’Reilly, S. (2018). Disarmed: Disability, Trauma, and Emasculation in Contemporary Japanese Cinema. Arts, 7, Article No. 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts7010010
[25]
Oliver, M. (1983). Social Work with Disabled People. Macmillan Education Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86058-6
[26]
Rose, G. (2001). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. Sage Publications.
[27]
Sabbir, M. (2021). Raat Jaga Phool [Film]. Fuljhuri Media Limited.
[28]
Safran, S. P. (1998). The First Century of Disability Portrayal in Film: An Analysis of the Literature. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 467-479. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699803100404
[29]
Schneider, I. (1977). Images of the Mind: Psychiatry in the Commercial Film. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 613-619. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.134.6.613
[30]
Schuchman, J. S. (1988). Hollywood Speak: Deafness and the Film Entertainment Industry. University of Illinois Press.
[31]
Sengupta, S. (2018). Disability, Agency, and Subjectivity in Aparna Sen’s Three Disability Films: Sati, House of Memories, and 15 Park Avenue. Gender and Women’s Studies, 1, 5. https://doi.org/10.31532/GendWomensStud.1.1.005
[32]
Thomson, R. G. (2002). The Politics of Staring: Visual Rhetoric of Disability in Popular Photography In S. L. Snyder, B. J. Brueggemann, & R. G. Thomson (Eds.), Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities (Vol. 1, pp. 56-75). Modern Language Association.
