全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A Microeconomic Analysis of the OER Textbook Market

DOI: 10.4236/me.2024.156033, PP. 667-677

Keywords: OER Textbooks, Open Educational Resources, Equity in Academia

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This article will use economic theory to understand the textbook markets better. In the last several decades the topic of textbook costs has been a prevailing discussion among researchers, faculty, economists, policymakers, etc. The high costs of textbooks have been viewed as barriers to accessing course materials which are invaluable in the understanding of the course content, absorption of knowledge, and successful completion of the course. These barriers have been viewed as hindering students’ equity because the economically disadvantaged would become educationally disadvantaged. From a positive economics perspective, a scientist would provide the reason for such an occurrence. However, from a normative economics perspective, a policymaker would recommend decreasing the costs of textbooks by cheaper alternatives, such as Open Educational Resources (OER). This article provides an economic analysis explaining the market forces that shape the costs of traditional textbooks and OERs and possible recommendations using economic analysis.

References

[1]  2012 Paris OER Declaration (2012).
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246687
[2]  Bagar-Fraley, B. (2022). The Textbooks Are Too Damn High: Calling for a More Nuanced Evaluation of OERs. CEA Critic, 84, 75-82.
https://doi.org/10.1353/cea.2022.0011
[3]  Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor (2019). Cost of College Tuition Has Remained Stable since September 2019. The Economics Daily.
https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2021/cost-of-college-tuition-has-remained-stable-since-september-2019.htm
[4]  Clinton, V., & Khan, S. (2019). Efficacy of Open Textbook Adoption on Learning Performance and Course Withdrawal Rates: A Meta-Analysis. AERA Open, 5.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419872212
[5]  Coase, R. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4, 386-405.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
[6]  Coase, R. (1988). The Nature of the Firm: Meaning. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4, 19-32.
[7]  CUNY (2018). New York State Open Educational Resources Funds CUNY Year One Report.
http://www2.cuny.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/page-assets/libraries/open-educational-resources/CUNY_OER_Report_-_Web_-_Accessible.pdf
[8]  Fisher, M. R. (2018). Evaluation of Cost Savings and Perceptions of an Open Textbook in a Community College Science Course. The American Biology Teacher, 80, 410-415.
https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2018.80.6.410
[9]  Florida Virtual Campus (2016). Student Textbook and Course Materials Survey.
http://www.openaccesstextbooks.org/pdf/2016_Florida_Student_Textbook_Survey.pdf
[10]  Florida Virtual Campus (2019). 2018 Student Textbook and Course Materials Survey.
https://assets.website-files.com/646e59f2d76c6e8c0c5223de/651ed916079423d264335a68_2018%20Student%20Textbook%20and%20Course%20Materials%20Survey%20Report%20--%20FINAL%20VERSION%20--%2020190308.pdf
[11]  Florida Virtual Campus (2022). Student Textbook and Course Materials Survey 2022.
https://assets.website-files.com/646e59f2d76c6e8c0c5223de/64de6132148ed7739bc186e4_FLVC%20Textbook%20Survey%20Report%20-%202022.pdf
[12]  Hewlett Foundation (n.d.). Open Education.
https://hewlett.org/strategy/open-education/#overview
[13]  Hilton, J. (2020). Open Educational Resources, Student Efficacy, and User Perceptions: A Synthesis of Research Published between 2015 and 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 853-876.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4
[14]  Katz, S., & Van Allen, J. (2022). Open with Intention: Situating Equity Pedagogy within Open Education to Advance Social Justice. Journal for Multicultural Education, 16, 421-429.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-07-2022-0089
[15]  Kimmel, S., Bol, L., Ryan, D., & Esqueda, M. (2022). The Experiences of Community College Faculty Using Open Educational Resources versus Publisher Textbooks. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 48, 255-270.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2022.2107118
[16]  Parsons, J. W. (2023). OER and No-Cost Textbook-Based Courses and Their Impact on Student Performance at a Rural Community College. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
[17]  Sergiadis, A. D. R., Smith, P., & Uddin, M. M. (2024). How Equitable, Diverse, and Inclusive Are Open Educational Resources and Other Affordable Course Materials? College & Research Libraries, 85, 44-63.
https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.1.44
[18]  Stanberry, K. (2022). OER Textbooks: A Helpful Tool for DEI Initiatives in Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22, 33-36.
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i8.5313
[19]  Table 330.40 (2022, November). Average Total Cost of Attendance for First-Time, Full-Time Undergraduate Students in Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions, by Control and Level of Institution, Living Arrangement, and Component of Student Costs: Selected Years, 2010-11 through 2021-2022. National Center for Education Statistics.
https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d22/tables/dt22_330.40.asp
[20]  Tila, D. (2023). Impact of OER Material during COVID-19: Survey of Students Enrolled in City University of New York (CUNY) Kingsborough Community College. American Journal of Science Education Research, 2, AJSER-128.
[21]  Tila, D., & Levy, D. (2022). Open Educational Resources Adoption Reduces Textbook Costs without Sacrificing Student Performance in Business and Economics Courses at a Community College. Social Education Research, 4, 122-130.
https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.4120231842
[22]  UNESCO (2021). Open Education Resources (OER).
https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133