全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

An Analysis of Teachers’ Questioning and Feedback in an ESL Class

DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2024.143025, PP. 483-495

Keywords: ESL Settings, Questioning Techniques, Feedback Mechanisms, Student Engagement

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This study delves into the efficacy of classroom language in evaluating student involvement and comprehension within ESL settings. It centers on the utilization of questioning techniques and feedback mechanisms in pedagogical approaches, pinpointing areas necessitating enhancement to foster student skill development. Four primary types of questioning are delineated: factual, reasoning, display, and inferential, among which display and referential questions emerge as pivotal methods of inquiry. The provision of constructive feedback by instructors assumes paramount importance in facilitating students’ comprehension of their linguistic proficiency and fostering communication abilities. While feedback stands as a cornerstone of language education, its dissemination must strike a delicate balance between employing display questions and fostering authentic inquiries, thereby accounting for variables such as educational value, student engagement, accessibility, and extension. Augmenting students’ capacity for self-questioning holds promise in expediting and enhancing their acquisition of the target language. Teachers are advised to exercise prudence in furnishing exemplar responses, integrate appropriate wait times, and elucidate intricate concepts to cater to the diverse needs of an inclusive classroom.

References

[1]  Barnes, D. (1969). Language in the Second Classroom. In D. Barnes, J. Britton, & H. Rogen (Eds.), Language, the Learner and the School (pp. 11-77). Penguin.
[2]  Chaudron, C. (1988). Second Language Classrooms: Research on Teaching and Learning (pp. 132-134). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524469
[3]  Holley, F. M., & Janet, K. K. (1971). Imitation and Correction in Foreign Language Learning. Modern Language Journal, 55, 494-498.
https://doi.org/10.2307/323789
[4]  Jones, R., & Brown, K. (2019). Linguistic Strategies in Classroom Instruction: A Qualitative Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 491-509.
[5]  Liu, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Correlational Analysis of Classroom Language and Student Achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 40, 601-618.
[6]  Long, M, & Sato, C. (1983). Classroom Foreigner Talk Discourse: Forms and Functions of Teachers’ Questions (pp. 268-285). Newsbury House.
[7]  Richards, J., & Lockhart, C. (1996). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms (pp. 185-187). Cambridge University Press.
[8]  Smith, J., Johnson, A., & Lee, C. (2018). Computational Linguistics Approaches to Analyzing Classroom Discourse: A Review. Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 211-230.
[9]  Stevens, R. (1912). The Question as a Means of Efficiency in Instruction: A Critical Study of Classroom Practice (p. 22). Teachers College, Columbia University.
[10]  Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory (pp. 242-244). Cambridge University Press.
[11]  White, J., & Patsy, M. L. (1984). Asking and Answering in ELS Classes. Canadian Modern Language Review, 40, 228-244.
https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.40.2.228

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413