Electric Vehicle (EV) adoption is rapidly increasing, necessitating efficient and precise methods for predicting EV charging requirements. The early and precise prediction of the battery discharging status is helpful to avoid the complete discharging of the battery. The complete discharge of the battery degrades its lifetime and requires a longer charging duration. In the present work, a novel approach leverages the Edge Impulse platform for live prediction of the battery status and early alert signal to avoid complete discharging. The proposed method predicts the actual remaining useful life of batteries. A powerful edge computing platform utilizes Tensor Flow-based machine learning models to predict EV charging needs accurately. The proposed method improves the overall lifetime of the battery by the efficient utilization and precise prediction of the battery status. The EON-Tuner and DSP processing blocks are used for efficient results. The performance of the proposed method is analyzed in terms of accuracy, mean square error and other performance parameters.
References
[1]
Qin, H., Fan, X., Fan, Y., Wang, R. and Tian, F. (2022) Lithium-Ion Batteries RUL Prediction Based on Temporal Pattern Attention. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2320, Article 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2320/1/012005
[2]
Li, X., Shu, X., Shen, J., Xiao, R., Yan, W. and Chen, Z. (2017) An On-Board Remaining Useful Life Estimation Algorithm for Lithium-Ion Batteries of Electric Vehicles. Energies, 10, Article 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10050691
[3]
Wu, Y., Li, W., Wang, Y. and Zhang, K. (2019) Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Neural Network and Bat-Based Particle Filter. IEEE Access, 7, 54843-54854. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2913163
[4]
Elmahallawy, M., Elfouly, T., Alouani, A. and Massoud, A.M. (2022) A Comprehensive Review of Lithium-Ion Batteries Modeling, and State of Health and Remaining Useful Lifetime Prediction. IEEE Access, 10, 119040-119070. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3221137
[5]
Chen, D., Hong, W. and Zhou, X. (2022) Transformer Network for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries. IEEE Access, 10, 19621-19628. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3151975
[6]
Jin, S., Sui, X., Huang, X., Wang, S., Teodorescu, R. and Stroe, D. (2021) Overview of Machine Learning Methods for Lithium-Ion Battery Remaining Useful Lifetime Prediction. Electronics, 10, Article 3126. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10243126
[7]
Park, K., Choi, Y., Choi, W.J., Ryu, H. and Kim, H. (2020) LSTM-Based Battery Remaining Useful Life Prediction with Multi-Channel Charging Profiles. IEEE Access, 8, 20786-20798. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2968939
[8]
Khumprom, P. and Yodo, N. (2019) A Data-Driven Predictive Prognostic Model for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on a Deep Learning Algorithm. Energies, 12, Article 660. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12040660
[9]
Ansari, S., Ayob, A., Hossain Lipu, M.S., Hussain, A. and Saad, M.H.M. (2021) Multi-Channel Profile Based Artificial Neural Network Approach for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Batteries. Energies, 14, Article 7521. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14227521
[10]
Mao, L., Xu, J., Chen, J., Zhao, J., Wu, Y. and Yao, F. (2020) A LSTM-STW and GS-LM Fusion Method for Lithium-Ion Battery RUL Prediction Based on EEMD. Energies, 13, Article 2380. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092380
[11]
Qiao, J., Liu, X. and Chen, Z. (2020) Prediction of the Remaining Useful Life of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Empirical Mode Decomposition and Deep Neural Networks. IEEE Access, 8, 42760-42767. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2977429
[12]
Jia, S. (2021) Economic, Environmental, Social, and Health Benefits of Urban Traffic Emission Reduction Management Strategies: Case Study of Beijing, China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, Article 102737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102737
[13]
Meng, X., Wang, W., Cao, X., Li, G. and Li, D. (2023) A RUL Prediction Method of Lithium-Ion Battery Based on Extreme Learning Machine. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2492, Article 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2492/1/012026
[14]
Xu, X., Yu, C., Tang, S., Sun, X., Si, X. and Wu, L. (2019) Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Wiener Processes with Considering the Relaxation Effect. Energies, 12, Article 1685. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091685
[15]
Lu, J., Li, X., Lei, H., Liu, Y. and Xiong, R. (2019) Remaining Useful Life Prediction Driven by Multi-Source Data for Batteries in Electric Vehicles. DEStech Transactions on Environment, Energy and Earth Sciences. https://doi.org/10.12783/dteees/iceee2019/31807
[16]
Zhao, J. and Burke, A.F. (2022) Electric Vehicle Batteries: Status and Perspectives of Data-Driven Diagnosis and Prognosis. Batteries, 8, Article 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries8100142
[17]
Xie, G., Peng, X., Li, X., Hei, X. and Hu, S. (2019) Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium‐Ion Battery Based on an Improved Particle Filter Algorithm. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 98, 1365-1376. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.23675
[18]
Bosello, M., Falcomer, C., Rossi, C. and Pau, G. (2023) To Charge or to Sell? EV Pack Useful Life Estimation via LSTMs, CNNs, and Autoencoders. Energies, 16, Article 2837. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062837
[19]
Hawsawi, T., Alolaiwy, M., Taleb, Y., Mezaael, A. and Zohdy, M. (2023) An Improved Thevenin Model-Based State-of-Charge Estimation of a Commercial Lithium-Ion Battery Using Kalman Filter. 2023 IEEE Smart World Congress (SWC), Portsmouth, 28-31 August 2023, 735-741. https://doi.org/10.1109/swc57546.2023.10448568
[20]
Lahade, S.V., Namuduri, S., Upadhyay, H. and Bhansali, S. (2020) Alcohol Sensor Calibration on the Edge Using Tiny Machine Learning (Tiny-ML) Hardware. ECS Meeting Abstracts, 2020, Article 1848. https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2020-01261848mtgabs
[21]
Wang, C., Lu, N., Wang, S., Cheng, Y. and Jiang, B. (2018) Dynamic Long Short-Term Memory Neural-Network—Based Indirect Remaining-Useful-Life Prognosis for Satellite Lithium-Ion Battery. Applied Sciences, 8, Article 2078. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112078
[22]
He, W., Huang, H., Feng, C., Lu, G., Han, P. and Zhao, Z. (2023) Using CNN-GRU-DNN Hybrid Method for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Second International Conference on Energy, Power, and Electrical Technology (ICEPET 2023), Kuala Lumpur, 127881V. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3004483
[23]
Duquesnoy, M., Liu, C., Dominguez, D.Z., Kumar, V., Ayerbe, E. and Franco, A.A. (2023) Machine Learning-Assisted Multi-Objective Optimization of Battery Manufacturing from Synthetic Data Generated by Physics-Based Simulations. Energy Storage Materials, 56, 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.12.040
[24]
Cai, S., Hu, J., Ma, S., Yang, Z. and Wu, H. (2022) Remaining Useful Life Prediction Method of EV Power Battery for DC Fast Charging Condition. Energy Reports, 8, 1003-1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.08.095
[25]
Sun, C., Qu, A., Zhang, J., Shi, Q. and Jia, Z. (2022) Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Improved Variational Mode Decomposition and Machine Learning Algorithm. Energies, 16, Article 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010313
[26]
Battery Remaining Useful Life (RUL). https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ignaciovinuales/battery-remaining-useful-life-rul
