Existing frameworks in Kenya recognize road aesthetics as crucial for transportation but lack clarity on the applicable criteria for assessing road environments. Current techniques, such as planting trees and grass, only indicate road attractiveness through greenery. Therefore, there is a need to clarify road aesthetic indicators for sustainable infrastructure development in Kenya. This paper aims to investigate the aspects of aesthetics used in road environment evaluation by conducting a systematic literature review to identify empirical evidence of descriptive verbs utilized as indicators for road aesthetics. The careful selection of these indicators aims to demonstrate the multifaceted benefits of integrating aesthetics into sustainable road development, and serves as a foundation for defining road aesthetics. This study examined relevant, peer-reviewed empirical studies dating back to 2010 that emphasized the visual character and quality of road environments. A qualitative meta-synthesis study reviewing the aesthetic descriptions was conducted. A search of the databases yielded 191 articles; however, only nine articles met the eligibility and quality criteria. A list of specific verbs from the eligible articles was created using content analysis, text mining, and Euclidean regularisation. The paper identifies coherence, imageability, naturalness, legibility, and maintenance as the most frequently used to evaluate road aesthetics. These findings provide a well-structured set of variables that can be used as crucial indicators of the aesthetic quality of roads in Kenya. The paper also recommends the urgent development of comprehensive policies that prioritize aesthetics in road development, mandating the inclusion of aesthetic considerations in all stages of road planning, design, and construction.
References
[1]
Abdi, M. H., & Lamíquiz-Daudén, P. J. (2020). Transit-Oriented Development in Developing Countries: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Its Policy, Planning and Implementation Challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 16, 195-221.
[2]
Anciaes, P. (2022). Effects of the Roadside Visual Environment on Driver Wellbeing and Behaviour—A Systematic Review. Transport Reviews, 43, 571-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2022.2133189
[3]
Antrop, M., & Van Eetvelde, V. (2017). Sensing and Experiencing the Landscape. In Landscape Perspectives (pp. 103-139).
[4]
Appleyard, D., Lynch, K., & Myer, J. R. (1964). The View from the Road (Vol. 196, Issue 3). MIT Press.
[5]
Armstrong, A., Sousa, L. R., Haggerty, C., Fischer, C., Wagenlander, W., & Brinckerhoff, P. (2013). An Integrated Approach to Sustainable Roadside Design and Restoration. Federal Highway Administration (US).
[6]
Bell, S. (2019). Elements of Visual Design in the Landscape. Routledge.
[7]
Blumentrath, C. (2016). Aesthetic Characteristics of Roads—Between Road Planning Professionals’ Ideals and Laypersons’ Perceptions. Doctoral Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
[8]
Blumentrath, C., & Tveit, M. S. (2014). Visual Characteristics of Roads: A Literature Review of People’s Perception and Norwegian Design Practice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 59, 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.10.024
[9]
Blumentrath, C., Nordh, H., & Tveit, S. (2015). Experts’ Views on Aesthetic Quality for Roads—Characteristics, Challenges and Success Factors in Norwegian Planning (pp. 309-319).
[10]
Bogucka, Z. (2021). The Nonvisual Legibility and the Coherence of Space: A New Theoretical Framework with Examples of Its Implementation in Empirical Research. Loci Communes, 1, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.31261/lc.2021.01.02
[11]
Chaudhary, S. K. (2020). Self Explaining and Forgiving Roads to Improve Road Safety. Indian Highways, 48, 15-23.
[12]
Chon, J., & Scott shafer, C. (2009). Aesthetic Responses to Urban Greenway Trail Environments. Landscape Research, 34, 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390802591429
[13]
Chowdhury, I. (2014). A User-Centered Approach to Road Design: Blending Distributed Situation Awareness with Self-Explaining Roads. PQDT-UK & Ireland.
[14]
Clay, G. R., & Smidt, R. K. (2004). Assessing the Validity and Reliability of Descriptor Variables Used in Scenic Highway Analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 66, 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-2046(03)00114-2
[15]
Clemente, O., & Ewing, R. (2005). Measuring Urban Design Qualities: An Illustrated Field Manual. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
[16]
Cunningham, M. L. (2018). Human Factors in Traffic Engineering Part II. Traffic Engineering and Management: The Integration of Movement and Place. Monash University.
[17]
Dell’Acqua, G., Mauro, R., & Russo, F. (2011). Descriptors in Scenic Highway Analysis: A Test Study along Italian Road Corridors. International Journal for Traffic & Transport Engineering, 1.
[18]
Drottenborg, H. (1999). Aesthetics and Safety in Traffic Environments. Lund Institute of Technology.
[19]
Ernawati, J. (2021). The Role of Complexity, Coherence, and Imageability on Visual Preference of Urban Street Scenes. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 764, Article ID: 012033.
[20]
Gehl, J. (2013). Cities for People. Island Press.
[21]
Guberman, S. (2017). Gestalt Theory Rearranged: Back to Wertheimer. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article No. 1782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01782
[22]
Guy, L. (2015). Prospect-Refuge Theory—Ernest Journal. English.
[23]
Havlick, D. (2002). No Place Distant: Roads and Motorized Recreation on America’s Public Lands. Island Press.
[24]
Hornbeck, P. L., & Okerlund, G. A. (1972). Visual Quality for the Highway User: A Study of the Relation of Factors of Visual Quality to Route Design. Highway Research Record, 410, 52-63.
[25]
Hornbeck, P. L., Forster, R. R., & Dillingham, M. R. (1969). Highway Aesthetics: Functional Criteria for Planning and Design. Highway Research Record, 280, 25-38.
[26]
Hunter, M. R., & Askarinejad, A. (2015). Designer’s Approach for Scene Selection in Tests of Preference and Restoration along a Continuum of Natural to Manmade Environments. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article No. 1228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01228
[27]
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities, 21, 13-25.
[28]
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
[29]
Kaymaz, I. C. (2012). Landscape Perception. In M. Ozyavuz (Ed.), Landscape Planning (pp. 251-276). InTech.
[30]
Lamberti, R., Russo, F., & Dell’Acqua, G. (2010). Visual Impact Assessment for Infrastructure Design. In Large Structures and Infrastructures for Environmentally Constrained and Urbanised Areas (pp. 668-676). IABSE. https://doi.org/10.2749/222137810796063256
[31]
Li, X., Xie, Q., Daim, T., & Huang, L. (2019). Forecasting Technology Trends Using Text Mining of the Gaps between Science and Technology: The Case of Perovskite Solar Cell Technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 432-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.012
[32]
Liu, L., & Jensen, M. B. (2018). Green Infrastructure for Sustainable Urban Water Management: Practices of Five Forerunner Cities. Cities, 74, 126-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.013
[33]
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City (Vol. 11). MIT Press.
[34]
Lynch, K. (1984). Good City Form. The MIT Press.
[35]
Martín, B., Ortega, E., Otero, I., & Arce, R. M. (2016). Landscape Character Assessment with GIS Using Map-Based Indicators and Photographs in the Relationship between Landscape and Roads. Journal of Environmental Management, 180, 324-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.044
[36]
Matijošaitienė, I., & Stankevičė, I. (2014). Road Landscape as a Product: Does It Satisfy Consumers’ Aesthetic Needs? The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 9, 297-305.
[37]
Matijošaitinė, I., & Navickaitė, K. (2012). Aesthetics and Safety of Road Landscape: Are They Related? Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 1, 20-25.
[38]
McLeod, S. (2007). Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. Simply Psychology, 1, 1-8.
[39]
McLeod, S. (2018). Theories of Selective Attention. Simply Psychology.
[40]
Mohamed, N. M., & Abdel-Gawad, A. K. (2011). Landscape Impact on Roadside Improvement in Egypt Case Study of Salah Salem Road, Cairo, Egypt. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12, 266-278.
[41]
Mok, J., Landphair, H. C., & Naderi, J. R. (2006). Landscape Improvement Impacts on Roadside Safety in Texas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.09.002
[42]
Mozer, M. C. (1988). A Connectionist Model of Selective Attention in Visual Perception(pp. 195-201). Program of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
[43]
Nasar, J. L. (1992). Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
[44]
Nasar, J. L. (1997). New Developments in Aesthetics for Urban Design. In Toward the Integration of Theory, Methods, Research, and Utilization (pp. 149-193). Springer.
[45]
Nasar, J. L. (1998). The Evaluative Image of the City. Sage Publications.
[46]
O’Sullivan, O. S., Holt, A. R., Warren, P. H., & Evans, K. L. (2017). Optimising UK Urban Road Verge Contributions to Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services with Cost-Effective Management. Journal of Environmental Management, 191, 162-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.062
[47]
Orians, G. H. (2022). An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach to Landscape Aesthetics. In Landscape Meanings and Values (pp. 3-25). Routledge.
[48]
Parsons, R., Tassinary, L. G., Ulrich, R. S., Hebl, M. R., & Grossman-Alexander, M. (1998). The View from the Road: Implications for Stress Recovery and Immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 113-140. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0086
[49]
Pasetto, M., & Barbati, S. D. (2012). When the Road Layout Becomes Persuasive for the Road Users: A Functional Study on Safety and Driver Behaviour. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48, 3274-3283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1293
[50]
Passonneau, J. (1996). Aesthetics and Other Community Values in the Design of Roads. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1549, 69-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196154900109
[51]
Phillips, B. B., Bullock, J. M., Osborne, J. L., & Gaston, K. J. (2020). Ecosystem Service Provision by Road Verges. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57, 488-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13556
[52]
Qin, X., Fang, M., Yang, D., & Wangari, V. W. (2023). Quantitative Evaluation of Attraction Intensity of Highway Landscape Visual Elements Based on Dynamic Perception. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 100, Article ID: 107081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107081
[53]
Roget, P. M. (2022). Roget’s Thesaurus. DigiCat.
[54]
Rosa, C. D., & Collado, S. (2019). Experiences in Nature and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: Setting the Ground for Future Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article No. 763. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00763
[55]
Sanoff, H. (2016). Visual Research Methods in Design (Routledge Revivals). Routledge.
[56]
Säumel, I., Weber, F., & Kowarik, I. (2016). Toward Livable and Healthy Urban Streets: Roadside Vegetation Provides Ecosystem Services Where People Live and Move. Environmental Science & Policy, 62, 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.012
[57]
Schutt, J. R., Phillips, K. L., & Landphair, H. C. (2001). Guidelines for Aesthetic Design in Highway Corridors: Tools and Treatments for Texas Highways.
[58]
Sezen, I., & Yılmaz, S. (2010). Visual Assessment for the Evaluation of Erzurum-Bayburt-of Highway as Scenic Road. Scientific Research and Essay, 5, 366-377.
[59]
Simensen, T., Halvorsen, R., & Erikstad, L. (2018). Methods for Landscape Characterisation and Mapping: A Systematic Review. Land Use Policy, 75, 557-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.022
[60]
Suprayoga, G. B., Bakker, M., Witte, P., & Spit, T. (2020). A Systematic Review of Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of Road Infrastructure Projects. European Transport Research Review, 12, Article No. 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-020-0400-6
[61]
Taylor, N. (2009). Legibility and Aesthetics in Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design, 14, 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802670929
[62]
Theeuwes, J. (2021). Self-Explaining Roads: What Does Visual Cognition Tell Us about Designing Safer Roads? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6, 1-15.
[63]
Tveit, M., Ode, Å., & Fry, G. (2006). Key Concepts in a Framework for Analysing Visual Landscape Character. Landscape Research, 31, 229-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390600783269
[64]
Van der Hoeven, F. D., Van Schaick, J., Van der Spek, S. C., & Smit, M. G. J. (2008). Urbanism on Track: Application of Tracking Technologies in Urbanism. Research in Urbanism Series 1.
[65]
Wang, D., Shen, Y., Meng, Q., Qin, X. C., & Wang, C. (2013). Research for Aesthetic and visual Quality Management in Highway Landscape. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 368, 49-52. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.368-370.49
[66]
Wilde, G. J. S. (2009). Roadside Aesthetic Appeal, Driver Behaviour and Safety. Canadian Journal of Transportation, 3, 109-121.
[67]
Wilson, A. (2019). The View from the Road. In The Culture of Nature: North American Landscape from Disney to the Exxon Valdez (2nd ed., pp. 1-47). Between the Lines.
[68]
Yang, L., van Dam, K., & Zhang, L. (2020). Developing Goals and Indicators for the Design of Sustainable and Integrated Transport Infrastructure and Urban Spaces. Sustainability, 12, Article No. 9677. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229677
