This article addresses the issue of globalization and the theoretical bases that aim to study the human being as a global immigrant. A. Schultz [1899-1959], Social Phenomenology, coined the term outsider to represent a being who belongs to a group different from his own. He discusses social dilemmas based on social antagonisms and idiosyncrasies. As we delve deeper into the implications of Schutz’s work, it becomes evident that the concept of the “outsider” is crucial for understanding the dynamics of globalization. The outsider, by virtue of their distinct values and typifications, often faces social barriers and prejudices that can lead to feelings of isolation and marginalization. However, this position also allows them to act as catalysts for social change, challenging established norms and fostering intercultural dialogue. Economic data highlights the significant impact of immigrants on host economies. According to a 2019 report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), immigrants made up about 17% of the labor force in the United States in 2018, contributing approximately $2 trillion to the GDP. Remittances sent by immigrants to their home countries also play a crucial role in economic development. The World Bank reported that global remittances reached $689 billion in 2018, with countries like India and Mexico receiving $79 billion and $36 billion, respectively. These remittances help reduce poverty and improve access to education and healthcare in recipient countries. Despite their contributions, immigrants often face economic inequalities and social exclusion. A 2018 study by the Pew Research Center found that immigrants in the United States had a poverty rate of 14%, compared to 12% for natives. This economic disparity can be attributed to factors such as labor market discrimination and limited access to educational resources. E. Morin’s Complexity Paradigm (Morin, 1921) offers a comprehensive framework for examining the multifaceted nature of human identity in a globalized context. Morin argues that human beings cannot be fully understood through a single disciplinary lens. Instead, their identities are shaped by a complex interplay of historical, cultural, social, and psychological factors. This paradigm underscores the importance of considering the diverse subjectivities that contribute to the formation of a person’s history and culture. Globalization must be studied not only through economic and political lenses but also through the intricate web of human
References
[1]
Al-Ali, N., Black, R., & Koser, K. (2001). The Limits to “Transnationalism”: Bosnian and Eritrean Refugees in Europe as Emerging Transnational Communities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24, 578-600. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870120049798
[2]
Basch, L. G., Glick Schiller, N., & Blanc-Szanton, C. (1994). Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Post-Colonial Predicaments, and De-Territorialized Nation-States. Gordon and Breach.
[3]
Fitzgerald, D. (2000). Negotiating Extra-Territorial Citizenship: Mexican Migration and the Transnational Politics of Community. Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California.
[4]
Goldring, L. (1992). La migracion Mexico-USA y la transnationalization del Space Political and Social: Perspectives from Rural Mexico. Estudios Sociologicos, 10, 315-340.
[5]
Guarnizo, L. E. (2003). The Economics of Transnational Living. InternationalMigrationReview, 37, 666-699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00154.x
[6]
Guarnizo, L. E., Sanchez, A. I., & Roach, E. (1999). Mistrusted, Fragmented Solidarity, and Transnational Migration: Colombians in New York and Los Angeles. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22, 367-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/014198799329521
[7]
Habermas, J. (1995). Citizenship and National Identity: Some Reflections on the Future of Europe. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Theorizing Citizenship. State University of New York Press.
[8]
Itzigsohn, J. et al. (1999). Mapping Dominican Transnationalism: Narrow and Broad Transnational Practices. EthnicandRacial Studies, 22, 316-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/014198799329503
[9]
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford University Press.
[10]
Levitt, P. (2001). The Transnational Villagers. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520926707
[11]
Morin, E. (1921). On Complexity. Hampton Press.
[12]
Norman, K. (1995). Citizenship and the Legal Conception of the Term. Journal of Legal Studies, 24, 567-589.
[13]
Ostergaard-Nielsen, E. (2001). The Politics of Migrants’ Transnational Political Practices. International Migration Review, 37, 760-786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00157.x
[14]
Ostergaard-Nielsen, E. (2003). Transnational Politics: The Case of Turks and Kurds in Germany. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203361627
[15]
Roberts, B. R., Frank, R., & Lozano-Ascencio, F. (1999). Transnational Migrant Communities and Mexican Migration to the US. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22, 238-266.
[16]
Schutz, A. (1999). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Northwestern University Press.
[17]
Smith, R. (2003). Mexican. Transnational Lives of New Immigrants University of California Press.
[18]
Smith, R. C. (1998). Transnational Localities: Community, Technology and the Politics of Membership within the Context of Mexico and U.S. Migration 1: Comparative Urban and Community Research. In M. P. Smith (Ed.), Transnationalism from Below: Comparative Urban and Community Research (Vol. 6, pp. 197-240). Routledge.
