全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

生态、女性的生存之困——《荒野指南》的生态女性主义解读
The Survival Dilemmas of Ecology and Female—An Eco-Feminists Interpretation of Wilderness Tips

DOI: 10.12677/wls.2024.123028, PP. 185-191

Keywords: 生态女性主义,父权制,生态,女性
Eco-Feminism
, Patriarchy, Ecology, Female

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

玛格丽特·阿特伍德(Margaret Atwood)是一位享有盛名的加拿大女作家,其短篇小说集《荒野指南》鲜明地彰显了她的生态女性主义意识。本文以生态女性主义为理论框架,对《荒野指南》开展文本分析,探讨生态与女性之间的紧密联系,及这种联系如何遭到了父权制文化的严重冲击。研究发现,该书中存在着原始乡村被侵占,人类“造物”自毁等生态困境;以及职业不公歧视和性权力被剥夺等女性困境。父权制概念框架下对立的价值二元论、等级思维、权力和特权概念,以及统治逻辑共同导致自然环境的恶化和女性地位的边缘化。阿特伍德呼吁人们重新在人类和自然、男性和女性之间建立一种更加和谐、平等的新型关系。
Margaret Atwood is a famous Canadian woman writer. Her eco-feminism is clearly demonstrated in her short story collection Wilderness Tips. Based on the theoretical framework of eco-feminism, this paper conducts a textual analysis of the Wilderness Tips to explore the close connection between nature and women, and how this connection has been seriously impacted by patriarchal culture. The study found that there were ecological dilemmas in the book, such as the invasion by towns towards countryside and severe environmental pollution, as well as women’s dilemmas such as occupational discrimination and deprivation of sexual power. The opposing value dualism, hierarchical thinking, the concept of power and privilege, and the logic of domination in the conceptual framework of patriarchy jointly lead to the deterioration of the natural environment and the marginalization of women’s status. Atwood calls for a more harmonious and equal relationship between man and nature, between man and woman.

References

[1]  玛格丽特·阿特伍德. 荒野指南[M]. 邹殳葳, 王子夔, 译. 郑州: 河南大学出版社, 2015.
[2]  d’Eaudbonne, F. (1974) Le Feminisme oula Mort. Pierre Horay.
[3]  罗婷, 谢鹏. 生态女性主义与文学批评[J]. 求索, 2004(4): 176-180.
[4]  Salleh, A.K. (1993) Working with Nature: Reciprocity or Control? Prentice Hall.
[5]  Merchant, C. (1980) The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. Harper and Row.
[6]  Warren, K.J. (2000) Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western Perspective on What It Is and Why It Matters. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[7]  Plumwood, V. (1991) Nature, Self, and Gender: Feminism, Environmental Philosophy and the Critique of Rationalism. Hypatia, 6, 3-27.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00206.x
[8]  罗斯玛丽·帕特南·童. 女性主义思潮导论[M]. 艾晓明, 等, 译. 武汉: 华中师范大学出版社, 2002.
[9]  Mies, M. (1998) Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labor. Zed Books Ltd.
[10]  Walby, S. (1990) Theorizing Patriarchy. Blackwell.
[11]  李碧云, 郝嘉亮. 追求自由, 回归两性生态和谐——女性主义视域下的《金色笔记》[J]. 渭南师范学院学报, 2018, 33(23): 57-61.
[12]  满珂. 社会性别研究中的“父权制”概念探究[J]. 民俗研究, 2003(2): 5-11.
[13]  刘思谦. 女性文学中的父权制解读[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 47(3): 12-15.
[14]  Worster, D. (1994) Natures Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge University Press.
[15]  曹南燕, 刘兵. 生态女性主义及其意义[J]. 哲学研究, 1996(5): 54-60.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413