全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

机器学习型货币政策模式与传统规则型模式比较
Comparison between Machine Learning Monetary Policy Model and Traditional Rule-Based Model

DOI: 10.12677/wer.2024.132026, PP. 222-233

Keywords: 泰勒规则,机器学习,长短期记忆网络,随机森林,货币政策
Taylor Rule
, Machine Learning, Long- and Short-Term Memory Networks, Random Forest, Monetary Policy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着机器学习算法的广泛应用,机器学习型货币政策模式相较于传统规则型模式是否更具优势是一个重要的研究课题。本文对比了泰勒规则模式与机器学习模式,首先预测出利率的泰勒规则值和机器学习值;其次使用多种指标评价利率预测的精确度;最后构建多元回归模型,来评价货币政策模式。结果表明,相对于泰勒规则模型,机器学习算法所预测的利率在多种不同的评价指标下都拥有更小的误差,能够更加精准地预测利率,并且机器学习算法预测的利率所对应的关键经济变量即GDP和CPI与实际值的差异也更小,能够更好地应用到实际中,因此机器学习型货币政策模式更有优势。
With the wide application of machine learning algorithms, the question of whether the machine learning model of monetary policy is more advantageous than the traditional rule-based model is an important research topic. This paper compares the Taylor rule model and the machine learning model, firstly, predicts the Taylor rule value and the machine learning value of the interest rate; secondly, evaluates the accuracy of the interest rate prediction by using a variety of indicators; finally, constructs a multiple regression model to evaluate the monetary policy model. The results show that, compared with the Taylor rule model, the machine learning algorithm predicts interest rates with smaller errors under a variety of different evaluation indexes, which can predict interest rates more accurately, and the key economic variables corresponding to the interest rates predicted by the machine learning algorithm, i.e. GDP and CPI, have smaller differences from the actual values, which can be better applied to the real world, and therefore, the machine learning monetary policy model is better.

References

[1]  易纲. 货币政策回顾与展望[J]. 中国金融, 2018(3): 9-11.
[2]  李宏瑾, 苏乃芳. 数量规则还是利率规则?——我国转型时期量价混合型货币规则的理论基础[J]. 金融研究, 2020(10): 38-54.
[3]  Kahn, G.A. (2012) The Taylor Rule and the Practice of Central Banking. In: Koenig, E.F., Leeson, R. and Kahn, G.A., Eds., The Taylor Rule and the Transformation of Monetary Policy, Vol. 63, Hoover Institution Press Stanford University, 68-70.
[4]  Taylor, J.B. (1993) Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195-214.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-L
[5]  Clarida, R., Gali, J. and Gertler, M. (2000) Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 147-180.
https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554692
[6]  Svensson, L.E. (1999) Inflation Targeting as a Monetary Policy Rule. Journal of Monetary Economics, 43, 607-654.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(99)00007-0
[7]  Williams, J.C. (1999) Simple Rules for Monetary Policy. Monetary Economics.
[8]  Woodford, M. (1999) Optimal Monetary Policy Inertia. The Manchester School, 67, 1-35.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9957.67.s1.1
[9]  陆军, 钟丹. 泰勒规则在中国的协整检验[J]. 经济研究, 2003(8): 76-85.
[10]  谢平, 罗雄. 泰勒规则及其在中国货币政策中的检验[J]. 经济研究, 2002(3): 3-12.
[11]  卞志村. 泰勒规则的实证问题及在中国的检验[J]. 金融研究, 2006(8): 56-69.
[12]  单强, 吕进中, 王伟斌, 等. 中国化泰勒规则的构建与规则利率的估算——基于考虑金融周期信息的潜在产出与自然利率的再估算[J]. 金融研究, 2020(9): 20-39.
[13]  耿中元, 李薇, 翟雪. 基于金融稳定的非线性泰勒规则——中国的经验证据[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2016(9): 12-24.
[14]  苏治, 卢曼, 李德轩. 深度学习的金融实证应用: 动态、贡献与展望[J]. 金融研究, 2017(5): 111-126.
[15]  Kurihara, Y. and Fukushima, A. (2019) AR Model or Machine Learning for Forecasting GDP and Consumer Price for G7 Countries. Applied Economics and Finance, 6, 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.11114/aef.v6i3.4126
[16]  Gogas, P., Papadimitriou, T. and Sofianos, E. (2022) Forecasting Unemployment in the Euro Area with Machine Learning. Journal of Forecasting, 41, 551-566.
https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2824
[17]  贺毅岳, 李萍, 韩进博. 基于CEEMDAN-LSTM的股票市场指数预测建模研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2020, 35(6): 34-45.
[18]  陈标金, 王锋. 宏观经济指标、技术指标与国债期货价格预测——基于随机森林机器学习的实证检验[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2019, 34(6): 29-35.
[19]  李仁宇, 叶子谦. 基于机器学习的基金收益预测[J]. 统计与决策, 2023, 39(11): 156-161.
[20]  涂艳, 王翔宇. 基于机器学习的P2P网络借贷违约风险预警研究——来自“拍拍贷”的借贷交易证据[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2018, 33(6): 69-76.
[21]  胡楠, 薛付婧, 王昊楠. 管理者短视主义影响企业长期投资吗?——基于文本分析和机器学习[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5): 139-156.
[22]  李斌, 邵新月, 李玥阳. 机器学习驱动的基本面量化投资研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(8): 61-79.
[23]  杨科, 张洲深, 田凤平. 高频数据环境下我国股票市场的波动率预测——基于机器学习和HAR模型的融合研究[J]. 计量经济学报, 2023, 3(3): 886-904.
[24]  Carvalho, C., Nechio, F. and Tristao, T. (2021) Taylor Rule Estimation by OLS. Journal of Monetary Economics, 124, 140-154.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2021.10.010
[25]  刘斌, 张怀清. 我国产出缺口的估计[J]. 金融研究, 2001(10): 69-77.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413