全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

苏里格气田影响暂堵压裂效果主控因素研究
Research on the Main Controlling Factors Affecting the Effect of Temporary Plugging and Fracturing in Sulige Gas Field

DOI: 10.12677/me.2024.123041, PP. 350-357

Keywords: 主控因素,相关性分析,灰色关联度,Spearman
Main Control Factors
, Correlation Analysis, Gray Correlation Degree, Spearman

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

苏里格气田致密气水平井在开发过程中,气田不同区块、同一区块中不同井甚至同一口井中不同暂堵段暂堵压裂效果差异较大,影响暂堵压裂效果因素不清楚。明确主控因素对优化暂堵压裂工艺具有指导意义。采用灰色关联度法与Spearman相关性分析法对主控因素进行分析,结果表明:1) 影响苏里格气田暂堵压裂效果的主控因素主要为:每段液量、簇间距、簇数。2) 簇间距、簇数及每段用液量存在最优区间,需要进一步优化;暂堵时机单一,时机前移或者后移可能会对暂堵效果产生较为明显的影响。
During the development process of tight gas horizontal wells in the Sulige Gas Field, the temporary plugging and fracturing effects vary greatly in different blocks of the gas field, different wells in the same block, and even different temporary plugging sections in the same well. Factors affecting the temporary plugging and fracturing effects are not sure. Clarifying the main control factors has guiding significance for optimizing the temporary plugging and fracturing process. Gray correlation method and Spearman correlation analysis were used to analyze the main control factors. The results show that: 1) The main controlling factors affecting the temporary plugging and fracturing effect of the Sulige Gas Field are: liquid volume in each section, cluster spacing, and cluster number. 2) There are optimal intervals for cluster spacing, number of clusters, and liquid consumption in each section, which need to be further optimized; the timing of temporary blockage is single, and moving the timing forward or backward may have a more obvious impact on the temporary blockage effect.

References

[1]  杨旭鹏, 王晓军, 韩子剑, 等. 苏里格气田采气集气工艺及管网模拟研究现状[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2024, 43(1): 8-14.
[2]  杨扬, 赖雅庭, 张心怡, 巩肖可, 韩江晨. 含水致密气藏特征、开发风险与有效动用对策——以苏里格气田含水区为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(6): 121-133.
[3]  张凯笑, 郭艳琴, 暴文博, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田东南部马五段地层水分布规律及主控因素[J/OL]. 地质通报: 1-13.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.4648.P.20240409.1213.002.html, 2024-04-16.
[4]  靳晓杰, 毛朝瑞, 程昱, 等. 苏里格气田苏东地区盒8段储层特征及主控因素分析[J]. 矿产勘查, 2024, 15(1): 53-59.
[5]  崔明明, 李进步, 李莹, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田西南部致密储层非均质性特征及对成藏的制约[J]. 地质学报, 2024, 98(1): 214-230.
[6]  余钟莲, 王瑞, 杨莉, 等. 基于熵权法和灰色关联度法评价枸杞子质量[J]. 中成药, 2024, 46(3): 919-926.
[7]  赵生智, 申胤宏, 周鹰槐. 基于斯皮尔曼相关系数的电网企业区间岗级任职资格信度研究[C]//云南电网有限责任公司. 中国电力企业管理创新实践(2022年). 北京: 《中国电力企业管理》杂志社, 2024: 4.
[8]  徐维超. 相关系数研究综述[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2012, 29(3): 12-17

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413