全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Y型通风工作面采空区自燃“三带”分布特性研究
Study on Distribution Characteristics of Spontaneous Combustion “Three Zones” in Goaf of Y-Type Ventilation Working Face

DOI: 10.12677/me.2024.123045, PP. 375-381

Keywords: Y型通风,采空区,煤自燃,三带
Y-Type Ventilation
, Goaf, Spontaneous Combustion of Residual Coal, Three Zones

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为了研究Y型通风条件下采空区自燃“三带”分布,提出综合指标判定法,在采空区布置束管和温度探测头开展现场监测,分析氧气、一氧化碳、二氧化碳和温度的空间变化特征,综合划分采空区自燃“三带”范围。研究结果表明:随着采空区深度增加,氧气浓度降低,一氧化碳和二氧化碳气体浓度先增高再降低,温度存在上升趋势但并不显著。利用其变化特征划分自燃“三带”,采空区进风侧散热带范围为0~25 m,氧化带25~93 m;窒息带大于93 m;回风侧散热带为0~51 m,氧化带51~101 m,窒息带大于101 m。工作面最小推进速度为0.65 m/d。
To investigate the distribution of “three zones” of spontaneous combustion in goaf under Y-type ventilation conditions, a comprehensive index determination method is proposed. This involves the arrangement of ducts and temperature probes in the goaf for on-site monitoring. The spatial variation characteristics of oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and temperature are analyzed to comprehensively delineate the range of the “three zones” of spontaneous combustion in the goaf. The research findings indicate that with the increase in goaf depth, the oxygen concentration decreases, while the concentrations of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide gases initially increase and then decrease, with temperature showing a rising trend but not significantly. Based on these characteristics, the “three zones” of spontaneous combustion are divided as follows: the cooling zone on the inlet side of the goaf ranges from 0 to 25 meters, the oxidation zone ranges from 25 to 93 meters, and the suffocation zone is greater than 93 meters; on the return air side, the cooling zone ranges from 0 to 51 meters, the oxidation zone ranges from 51 to 101 meters, and the suffocation zone is greater than 101 meters. The minimum advancing speed of the working face is 0.65 meters per day.

References

[1]  秦波涛, 仲晓星, 王德明, 等. 煤自燃过程特性及防治技术研究进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2021, 49(1): 66-99.
[2]  贾宝山, 汪伟, 祁云, 等. 晋牛矿1303综放面采空区注氮方案研究及数值模拟[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2018, 14(3): 82-88.
[3]  韩颖, 刘德宝. 不同通风方式条件下采空区氧气与瓦斯分布规律研究[J]. 煤炭技术, 2023, 42(1): 115-118.
[4]  杜明. Y型通风工作面采空区漏风封堵技术应用[J]. 江西煤炭科技, 2023(3): 196-198.
[5]  李昶, 蔡峰. Y型通风采空区漏风流场数值模拟研究[J]. 煤炭技术, 2022, 41(4): 126-129.
[6]  贾廷贵, 李颜兵, 娄和壮, 等. Y型通风方式瓦斯与煤自燃耦合模拟[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 40(5): 390-395.
[7]  张清清. Y型通风抽采条件下采空区自燃“三带”研究[J]. 煤, 2023, 32(1): 57-60.
[8]  李洪先, 王国芝, 朱明凯, 等. Y型通风下采空区瓦斯与自然发火耦合危险区域划分研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2021, 53(8): 105-109.
[9]  田垚, 汤思敏, 王佳俐, 等. 基于示踪检测法与数值模拟的Y型通风工作面采空区漏风规律研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2020, 47(5): 40-45.
[10]  桂小红, 蔚世鹏. 综放工作面Y型通风方式下的采空区自燃“三带”研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2019, 51(2): 49-53.
[11]  刘伟, 秦跃平, 杨小彬, 等. 采空区自然发火的能量迁移理论[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(6): 906-910.
[12]  周健, 刘泽功. 采空区三维耦合场数值模拟研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2014, 10(6): 116-121.
[13]  谢军, 薛生. 综放采空区空间自燃三带划分指标及方法研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2011, 39(1): 65-68.
[14]  刘忠全, 郝宇. 综放采空区自燃“三带”分布影响因素研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2017, 49(10): 94-96.
[15]  王文才, 刘涛涛, 王政, 等. 双标准划分综采工作面采空区自燃“三带”[J]. 煤炭技术, 2018, 37(6): 138-140.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413