全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Minimally Invasive Total Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Stem Disease

DOI: 10.4236/wjcs.2024.147012, PP. 107-114

Keywords: Left Main Stem, Minimally Invasive CABG, Bilateral Internal Mammary Arteries

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Objective: The aim was to show that Minimally Invasive total arterial revascularization for left main stem coronary artery disease, via a left anterior Mini thoracotomy using bilateral internal thoracic arteries is feasible, reproducible and safe. Further, there has been no exclusive data or experience with minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting in left main stem disease. Methods: From April 2019 to March 2024, 41 patients with left main stem stenosis, left main equivalent disease and unprotected left main with triple vessel disease underwent off pump minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting using either in situ pedicled Bilateral Internal Thoracic arteries or Left and Right Internal Thoracic artery Y composite conduits at three centers. Bilateral Internal Thoracic arteries were harvested under direct vision. All patients had an Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump inserted via the femoral artery prior to induction of anesthesia, to prevent any hemodynamic instability, arrhythmias, and was removed following completion of the procedure in the operating room without any complications. Efficacy and outcomes were evaluated by i) Primary (MACCE)-Major Adverse Cardiac and Cardiovascular events and ii) Secondary outcome measures including total length of stay, return to full physical activity and quality of life. Mean follow-up was 1.4 years (Maximum was 2.5 years). Results: 41 patients with left main stem coronary artery stenosis, underwent total arterial revascularization using bilateral internal thoracic arteries. Left main stem stenosis was present in 29 patients, Unprotected left main stem stenosis with triple vessel disease in 7 and left main equivalence in 5 patients. In this cohort, 29 patients with only left main stem stenosis had 2 grafts each, 7 patients with left main and triple vessel disease had 3 grafts and 5 patients with left main equivalent disease had 2 grafts respectively. The average number of grafts was 2.2. One patient was converted to open sternotomy as an emergency because of hemodynamic instability and myocardial revascularization was done on cardiopulmonary bypass (2.2%). The average hospital stay was 3.7 days. Ejection fraction was 45% ± 5%. There was one mortality (2.2%) but no major morbidity. The average ICU and hospital stay was 24 ± 4 hours and 3.7 days. All patients were free from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at follow-up. Conclusions: Multivessel total arterial revascularization using

References

[1]  El-Menyar, A.A., Al Suwaidi, J. and Holmes, D.R. (2007) Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: State-of-the-Art. Current Problems in Cardiology, 32, 103-193.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2006.12.002
[2]  Taggart, D.P., Kaul, S., Boden, W.E., Ferguson, T.B., Guyton, R.A., Mack, M.J., et al. (2008) Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Stem Coronary Artery Stenosis: Stenting or Surgery. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 51, 885-892.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.067
[3]  Gaudino, M., Hameed, I., Farkouh, M.E., Rahouma, M., Naik, A., Robinson, N.B., et al. (2020) Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality in Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Percutaneous Interventions with Coronary Bypass Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180, 1638-1646.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4748
[4]  Lapierre, H., Chan, V., Sohmer, B., et al. (2011) Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting via a Small Thoracotomy versus Off-Pump: A Case-Matched Study. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 40, 804-810.
[5]  Nambiar, P., Kumar, S., Mittal, C.M. and Saksena, K. (2018) Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Bilateral Internal Thoracic Arteries: Will This Be the Future? The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 155, 190-197.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.088
[6]  Oliviers, M., Soares, A., Mirand, R., et al. (2017) CABG Surgery Remains the Best Option for Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Comparision with PCI-DES: Meta Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trial, Brazl. Cardiovasc Surgery, 32, 408-416.
[7]  Persson, J., Yan, J., Angerås, O., Venetsanos, D., Jeppsson, A., Sjögren, I., et al. (2023) PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: The Swede Heart Registry. European Heart Journal, 44, 2833-2842.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad369
[8]  Jahangiri, M., Mani, K., Yates, M.T. and Nowell, J. (2020) The EXCEL Trial: The Surgeons’ Perspective. European Cardiology Review, 15, e67.
https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2020.34
[9]  Gaudino, M., Farkouh, M.E. and Stone, G.W. (2022) Left Main Revascularization: An Evidence-Based Reconciliation. European Heart Journal, 43, 2421-2424.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac216
[10]  Muneretto, C., Negri, A., Manfredi, J., Terrini, A., Rodella, G., ElQarra, S., et al. (2003) Safety and Usefulness of Composite Grafts for Total Arterial Myocardial Revascularization: A Prospective Randomized Evaluation. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 125, 826-835.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2003.154
[11]  McGinn, J.T., Usman, S., Lapierre, H., Pothula, V.R., Mesana, T.G. and Ruel, M. (2009) Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Dual-Center Experience in 450 Consecutive Patients. Circulation, 120, S78-S84.
https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.108.840041
[12]  Nambiar, P. and Mittal, C. (2013) Minimally Invasive Coronary Bypass Using Internal Thoracic Arteries via a Left Minithoracotomy: “The Nambiar Technique”. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, 8, 420-426.
[13]  Kikuchi, K., Chen, X., Mori, M., Kurata, A. and Tao, L. (2017) Perioperative Outcomes of Off-Pump Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Bilateral Internal Thoracic Arteries under Direct Vision. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 24, 696-701.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw431
[14]  Guo, M.H., Wells, G.A., Glineur, D., Fortier, J., Davierwala, P.M., Kikuchi, K., et al. (2019) Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery Compared to Sternotomy Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The MIST Trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 78, 140-145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2019.01.006
[15]  Ruel, M. (2021) Nonsternotomy Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Key Development in Cardiac Surgery. JTCVS Techniques, 10, 162-167.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.09.033
[16]  Serruys, P.W., Morice, M.-C., Kappetein, A.P., Colombo, A., Holmes, D.R., Mack, M.J., et al. (2009) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery Disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 961-972.
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0804626
[17]  Mohr, F.W., Morice, M.-C., Kappetein, A.P., Feldman, T.E., Ståhle, E., Colombo, A., et al. (2013) Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Three-Vessel Disease and Left Main Coronary Disease: 5-Year Follow-Up of the Randomised, Clinical SYNTAX Trial. The Lancet, 381, 629-638.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60141-5

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133