全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于可拓TOPSIS和集对分析的飞行程序评价模型
Flight Program Evaluation Model Based on Extension TOPSIS and Set Pair Analysis

DOI: 10.12677/hjdm.2024.143017, PP. 179-188

Keywords: 航空运输,飞行程序评估,可拓TOPSIS,集对分析
Air Transport
, Flight Procedure Assessment, Extension TOPSIS, Set Pair Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

飞行程序设计的优劣将决定终端区的飞行安全和效率,故其评估至关重要。本文从安全性、经济性、管制员指挥复杂性、环境影响等方面出发,建立了飞行程序的评价指标体系。鉴于部分指标的数据采集技术难、可靠性低和成本高等缺陷,指标类型涉及确定、区间、语言和随机型等,针对既有评价方法无法较好处理部分指标的确定和不确定性,以及指标之间的矛盾、冲突、对立问题,通过融合集对分析、可拓物元理论和TOPSIS方法,构建了考虑混合指标的可拓TOPSIS和集对分析评价模型,将全部指标类型转化为联系数,在计算各个飞行程序物元与正负理想程序物元的可拓联系数距离基础上,得到了各个飞行程序物元的联系数贴近度。最后,以某机场的飞行程序设计为例,分析了不同联系数取值范围对多个飞行程序的优劣排序影响,并与传统模型进行对比分析,从而验证了模型的合理性和有效性。
The quality of flight program design directly affects the flight safety, efficiency and capacity of the terminal area, so the evaluation of flight program is very important. In this paper, the evaluation index system of flight procedures is established from the aspects of safety, economy, complexity of controller command and environmental impact. In view of the difficulties in data acquisition technology, low reliability and high cost of some indicators, the type of indicators involves determination, interval, language and random variables. Aiming at the problems that the existing evaluation methods can not deal with the determination and uncertainty of some indexes well, as well as the contradictions, conflicts and opposites among indexes, by integrating set pair analysis, extension matter element theory and TOPSIS method, the evaluation models of extension TOPSIS and set pair analysis considering mixed indexes are constructed. In this method, all index types were converted into relation numbers. On the basis of calculating the extended relation number distance between the matter elements of each flight program and the matter elements of positive and negative ideal programs, the relation number closeness degree of each flight program was obtained. Finally, taking the flight program design of a airport as an example, this paper analyzes the influence of different connection number value range on the sequencing of multiple flight programs, and compares it with the traditional model, so as to verify the rationality and effectiveness of the model.

References

[1]  吕宗平, 陈雪蕊, 徐涛. 基于噪声最优航迹的飞行程序优化方法研究[J]. 计算机与数字工程, 2016, 44(8): 1458-1464.
[2]  胡青云, 张飞桥, 周云帆. 飞行程序优化对端净空地形复杂机场容量的影响[J]. 航空计算技术, 2019, 49(4): 84-87.
[3]  王超, 孙岩. 仪表飞行程序运行安全性评价模型与仿真分析[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2011, 29(2): 5-8.
[4]  张召悦, 王超, 孟娜, 等. 基于航迹分段的飞行程序噪声评估方法[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2014, 14(3): 116-120.
[5]  Nuic, A. (2010) User Manual for the Base of Aircraft Data (BADA) Revision 3.10. Eurocontrol Report, Toulouse.
[6]  Alam, S., Nguyen, M.H., Abbass, H.A., Lokan, C., Ellejmi, M. and Kirby, S. (2010) A Dynamic Continuous Descent Approach Methodology for Low Noise and Emission. 29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Salt Lake City, 3-7 October 2010, 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1109/dasc.2010.5655502
[7]  陈肯. 不确定多属性决策在PBN飞行程序方案优选中的应用[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2012, 12(3): 154-158.
[8]  赵向领, 李丽霞. 基于模糊方法的飞行程序评价[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2011, 29(5): 20-24.
[9]  Chen, K. and Yan, Q. (2009) Application of Fuzzy—AHP Method to Optimal Selection of FPDS. International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2009, Chengdu, 25-27 July 2009, 2454-2462.
https://doi.org/10.1061/41039(345)406
[10]  Tian, J.S. (2019) Efficiency of High-Standard Farmland Development Based on Matter-Element Extension and Topsis Modeling. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17, 11303-11316.
https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1705_1130311316
[11]  Wan, X., Yang, T., Zhang, Q., Yan, X., Hu, C., Sun, L., et al. (2021) A Novel Comprehensive Model of Set Pair Analysis with Extenics for River Health Evaluation and Prediction of Semi-Arid Basin—A Case Study of Wei River Basin, China. Science of the Total Environment, 775, Article 145845.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145845
[12]  王志伟, 刘曙光, 许健. 基于物元可拓法的轨道交通PPP项目风险评价研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2021, 51(3): 15-25.
[13]  刁莉娟, 姚建, 艾怡凝. 基于SPA-TOPSIS耦合的工业绿色发展综合评价[J]. 生态经济, 2020, 36(9): 54-57.
[14]  范德成, 蔡文科. 中部六省高技术产业创新驱动绩效分析——基于熵值和TOPSIS法物元评判模型[J]. 工业技术经济, 2016, 35(10): 109-116.
[15]  钱勇, 马健霄, 赵顗, 等. 基于集对可拓物元模型的公路隧道运营环境安全评价方法[J]. 森林工程, 2020, 36(1): 87-95.
[16]  Sun, B., Wei, M. and Zhu, S. (2019) A Hybrid-Type Indicator Set Pairs Analysis Model for Evaluating Transit Operational Efficiency. Journal of Nonlinear and Convex Analysis, 20, 893-904.
[17]  申毅荣, 解建仓. 基于熵权和TOPSIS法的水安全模糊物元评价模型研究及其应用[J]. 系统工程, 2014, 32(7): 143-148.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133