全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

构树雌雄植株外植体组织培养再生能力的差异
Comparison of Fertility between Male and Female Broussonetia papyrifera Plants in Tissue Culture

DOI: 10.12677/br.2024.134047, PP. 446-452

Keywords: 叶片,茎段,雌雄差异,生殖能力,组织培养
Leaves
, Stem Segment, Male and Female Differences, Reproductive Capacity, Tissue Culture

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目前关于构树(Broussonetia papyrifera)植株外植体组织培养体系的研究有很多,但是探究构树雌雄株外植体组织培养再生能力的差异的研究鲜有报道。为了研究构树雌雄植株外植体组织培养再生能力的差异性,本实验采集在野外条件下构树雌雄株的外植体,选取构树雌雄株叶片和茎段进行组织培养,观察愈伤组织分化、不定芽的分化和生根情况,实验发现构树雌雄株生殖力差异较大,尤其是不定芽的分化阶段,雌雄株生殖力有很明显的区别,无论是构树叶片还是茎段作为外植体,雄株的生殖力均低于雌,叶片外植体的生殖力大于茎段。这为扩大构树苗木的栽培规模、加快构树苗木生产的产业化提供科学依据及技术保障,为构树生态修复的应用奠定基础。
At present, there are many studies on tissue culture system of Broussonetia papyrifera plant explants, but there are few reports on the difference of tissue culture and regeneration ability between male and female Broussonetia papyrifera plants. In order to study the difference of tissue culture and regeneration ability of male and female Broussonetia papyrifera explants, the explants of male and female Broussonetia papyrifera were collected in the field, and the leaves and stem segments of male and female Broussonetia papyrifera were selected for tissue culture, and the callus differentiation, adventitious bud differentiation and rooting were observed. It was found that the fertility of male and female Broussonetia papyrifera was quite different, especially in the stage of adventitious bud differentiation. This provides scientific basis and technical support for expanding the cultivation scale of Broussonetia papyrifera seedlings and accelerating the industrialization of Broussonetia papyrifera seedlings production, and lays a foundation for the application of Broussonetia papyrifera ecological restoration.

References

[1]  Renner, S.S. and Ricklefs, R.E. (1995) Dioecy and Its Correlates in the Flowering Plants. American Journal of Botany, 82, 596-606.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1995.tb11504.x
[2]  Coder, K.D. (2008) Tree Sex: Gender and Reproductive Strategies. University of Georgia.
[3]  Charlesworth, D. (2016) Plant Sex Chromosomes. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 67, 397-420.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111911
[4]  董莉娜, 苏雪, 孙坤, 等. DNA分子标记在雌雄异株植物性别鉴定中的应用[J]. 广西植物, 2006, 26(1): 63-68.
[5]  Obeso, J.R. (2002) The Costs of Reproduction in Plants. New Phytologist, 155, 321-348.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00477.x
[6]  Case, A.L., and Ashman, T.L. (2005) Sex-Specific Physiology and Its Implications for the Cost of Reproduction. In: Reekie, E.G. and Bazzaz, F.A., Eds., Reproductive Allocation in Plants, Academic Press, 129-157.
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012088386-8/50005-3
[7]  Iglesias, M.C., and Bell, G. (1989) The Small-Scale Spatial Distribution of Male and Female Plants. Oecologia, 80, 229-235.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00380156
[8]  Jing, S.W., and Coley, P.D. (1990) Dioecy and Herbivory: The Effect of Growth Rate on Plant Defense in Acer negundo. Oikos, 58, 369-377.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3545228
[9]  Jing, J., Hong, J., Shuquan, Y., and Guomo, Z. (2008) Sex-Linked Photosynthetic Physiologic Research and the Evolutionary Ecological Analysis in Living Fossil Plant, Ginkgo biloba L. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28, 1128-1136.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2032(08)60035-9
[10]  Shi, D., Wei, X., Chen, G., and Xu, Y. (2012) Changes in Photosynthetic Characteristics and Antioxidative Protection in Male and Female Ginkgo during Natural Senescence. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 137, 349-360.
https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.137.5.349
[11]  曹全, 江洪, 曾波, 等. 孑遗植物银杏(Ginkgo biloba L.)雌雄株水分生理特征初步研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(18): 8732-8735.
[12]  Xu, X., Peng, G., Wu, C., Korpelainen, H., and Li, C. (2008) Drought Inhibits Photosynthetic Capacity More in Females than in Males of Populus cathayana. Tree Physiology, 28, 1751-1759.
https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/28.11.1751
[13]  Zhang, S., Chen, L., Duan, B., Korpelainen, H., and Li, C. (2012) Populus cathayana Males Exhibit More Efficient Protective Mechanisms than Females under Drought Stress. Forest Ecology and Management, 275, 68-78.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.03.014
[14]  王诗雅. 构树幼苗与杂交构树幼苗对盐碱胁迫的生理响应研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2019.
[15]  苟蓉. 干旱对构树幼苗生长发育及生理代谢影响的性别差异[D]: [博士学位论文]. 南充: 西华师范大学, 2020.
[16]  轩敏感, 李永东, 曹先进, 等. 杂交构树的开发前景及栽培技术[J]. 农家参谋, 2019(27): 70, 72.
[17]  吴际友, 童方平, 龙应忠. 杂交构树嫩枝短穗扦插育苗技术[J]. 林业科技开发, 2003, 17(6): 60.
[18]  万文, 刘忠华, 魏会琴. 杂交构树茎段组培快繁体系的建立[J]. 福建林业科技, 2010, 37(1): 72-76, 109.
[19]  郁蒙蒙, 施国新, 吕群丹, 等. 光叶叶片和叶柄再生体系的建立[J]. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19(2): 253-256.
[20]  魏会琴. 杂交构树再生体系的建立及形态解剖观察[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2009.
[21]  Murashige, T., and Skoog, F. (1962) A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiologia plantarum, 15, 473-497.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
[22]  吴丽君, 陈达, 许冰. 日本茵芋雌雄株的组织培养[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2019, 39(3): 292-296.
[23]  郭晓亮. 栝楼苗期性别差异及组织培养研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2009.
[24]  陈茜, 范佳露, 王宝腾, 等. 落叶型冬青雌、雄株茎段的组织培养技术[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(6): 181-186.
[25]  张元国, 刁家连, 李芳, 等. 紫芦笋茎尖组培快繁技术研究术[J]. 中国农学通报, 2004, 20(3): 190-192.
[26]  陈颖. 银杏组织、细胞培养及其生产黄酮的代谢调控研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2005.
[27]  Dauphin-Guerin, B., Teller, G., and Durand, B. (1980) Different Endogenous Cytokinins between Male and Female Mercurialis annua L. Planta, 148, 124-129.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00386412
[28]  李美善, 许明子, 李长军, 等. 高山红景天不同性别植株形态的比较研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(4): 1599-1600.
[29]  温伟庆, 陈友吾. 银杏雌雄株过氧化物酶和过氧化氢酶活性差异研究[J]. 福建林业科技, 2002, 29(2): 34-39.
[30]  卢崇恩, 肖虹, 王文英, 闫晋民. 沙棘雌雄株部分生理生化指标的差异[J]. 沙棘, 1995, 8(2): 16-18.
[31]  He, M., Shi, D., Wei, X., et al. (2016) Gender-Related Differences in Adaptability to Drought Stress in the Dioecious Tree Ginkgo biloba. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 38, 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-016-2148-0
[32]  Delph, L.F., and Herlihy, C.R. (2012) Sexual, Fecundity, and Viability Selection on Flower Size and Number in a Sexually Dimorphic Plant. Evolution, 66, 1154-1166.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01510.x
[33]  李娜, 郭学民, 黎明, 等. 构树雌雄株叶片解剖结构特征的比较研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2017, 35(2): 164-170.
[34]  Bro, R., and Heimdal, H. (1996) Enzymatic Browning of Vegetables. Calibration and Analysis of Variance by Multiway Methods. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 34, 85-102.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7439(96)00019-6
[35]  刘玲玲. 植物组织培养中外植体发生褐变的原因及防止措施[J]. 喀什师范学院学报, 2011, 32(3): 44-46.
[36]  Ma, Y.M., Li, Y., Liu, J.Y., et al. (2004) Anti-Helicobacter pylori Metabolites from Rhizoctonia sp. Cy064, an Endophytic Fungus in Cynodon dactylon. Fitoterapia, 75, 451-456.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2004.03.007
[37]  Gunatilaka, A.L. (2006) Natural Products from Plant-Associated Microorganisms: Distribution, Structural Diversity, Bioactivity, and Implications of Their Occurrence. Journal of Natural Products, 69, 509-526.
https://doi.org/10.1021/np058128n
[38]  张春燕. 构树内生真菌及其抗肿瘤次级代谢产物研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 第二军医大学, 2013.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413