|
|
Botanical Research 2024
浒苔发酵液及其复合液剂对土壤性质和酶活性的影响
|
Abstract:
为探讨海藻生物肥对土壤性质及酶活性的影响，本文以浒苔发酵液及其复合液在番茄种植土壤施用后，不同处理组间土壤性质及酶活性进行了比较研究。试验结果表明：T1 (浒苔发酵液)的pH值最低，较未处理前下降10.95%；T4 (浒苔–菊花复合液)处理下的土壤脲酶酶活性最高，较空白对照组显著提高58.82%；T3 (浒苔–金银花复合液)处理下的蔗糖酶酶活性最高，较空白对照组提高6.13%；T3 (浒苔–金银花复合液)处理下的土壤磷酸酶酶活性最高，较空白对照组显著提高13.44%。综上，浒苔发酵液及其复合液能够降低土壤的pH值，促进植株对有机质的吸收，提高土壤中脲酶、蔗糖酶、磷酸酶的活性，有利于改善土壤肥效转化的微生态环境。
In order to explore the effect of seaweed biofertiliser on soil properties and enzyme activities, this paper conducted a comparative study of soil properties and enzyme activities between different treatments after the application of Enteromorpha prolifera fermentation liquid and its composite liquid in tomato planting soil. The test results showed that: T1 (Enteromorpha prolifera fermentation liquid) had the lowest pH value, which decreased by 10.95% compared to that before untreated; T4 (Enteromorpha prolifera-chrysanthemum composite liquid) had the highest soil urease enzyme activity under the treatment, which was significantly increased by 58.82% compared to that of the blank control group; T3 (Enteromorpha prolifera-honeysuckle composite liquid) had the highest sucrase enzyme activity under the treatment, which was increased by 6.13% compared to that of the blank control group; T3 (Enteromorpha prolifera-honeysuckle composite liquid) had the phosphatase enzyme activity was the highest, which was significantly increased by 13.44% compared to the blank control group. In conclusion, the Enteromorpha prolifera fermentation liquid and its compound liquid can reduce the soil PH, promote the absorption of organic matter by plants, improve the activities of urease, sucrase and phosphatase in soil, and help to improve the soil microbiological environment of soil fertility transformation.
| [1] | Wolna-Maruwka, A., Piechota, T., Niewiadomska, A., Kamiński, A., Kayzer, D., Grzyb, A., et al. (2021) The Effect of Biochar-Based Organic Amendments on the Structure of Soil Bacterial Community and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.). Agronomy, 11, Article 1286. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071286 |
| [2] | 郇丽, 顾文辉, 王立军, 等. 绿藻浒苔多元化应用研究进展[J]. 海洋科学, 2022, 46(11): 139-146. |
| [3] | 王宗灵, 傅明珠, 周健, 等. 黄海浒苔绿潮防灾减灾现状与早期防控展望[J]. 海洋学报, 2020, 42(8): 1-11. |
| [4] | 王秀娟, 张坤生, 任云霞, 等. 海藻酸钠凝胶特性的研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2008(2): 259-262. |
| [5] | 张蕊, 王钰馨, 赵雪惠, 等. 海藻有机肥不同施用量对土壤肥力及‘肥城’桃品质的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2016, 52(12): 1819-1828. |
| [6] | 王秀梅, 安毅, 秦莉, 等. 对比施用生物炭和肥料对土壤有效镉及酶活性的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2018, 37(1): 67-74. |
| [7] | Wang, M., Chen, L., Li, Y., Chen, L., Liu, Z., Wang, X., et al. (2018) Responses of Soil Microbial Communities to a Short-Term Application of Seaweed Fertilizer Revealed by Deep Amplicon Sequencing. Applied Soil Ecology, 125, 288-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.02.013 |
| [8] | 张广雨, 褚德朋, 刘元德, 等. 生物炭及海藻肥对烟草生长、土壤性状及青枯病发生的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2019, 40(5): 15-22. |
| [9] | 王孝莹, 白光瑛, 吴林林, 等. 利用植物多样性控制南方根结线虫(Meloidogyne in cognita)的初步探讨[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(5): 1233-1239. |
| [10] | 郭慧婷, 高静, 张强, 等. 有机肥对我国酸性和碱性土壤pH的影响差异及原因[J/OL]. 应用与环境生物学报. https://doi.org/10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2023.06003, 2024-04-16. |
| [11] | 林正眉, 侯琼昭, 罗刚跃, 等. 桉树林下套种对牧草糙毛假地豆的生长和林地土壤养分的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2017, 44(12): 45-52. |
| [12] | 刘新源. 生物炭与无机有机肥料混合施用对土壤理化特性和烟叶产量品质的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2014. |
| [13] | 高彦波, 翟鹏辉, 谭德远. 土壤酶活性与土壤肥力的关系研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(6): 100-101, 183. |
| [14] | 黄雪琳, 杨静, 贺宇纯. 土壤酶活性的主要影响因素分析[J]. 现代园艺, 2018(11): 92-93. |
| [15] | 王国兴, 徐福利, 王渭玲, 等. 土壤中细菌产氨代谢对农田生态系统的意义[J]. 水土保持研究, 2012, 19(6): 305-308. |
| [16] | Naga Raju, M., Golla, N. and Vengatampalli, R. (2016) Soil Invertase. In: Naga Raju, M., Golla, N. and Vengatampalli, R., Eds., Soil Enzymes, Springer, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42655-6_8 |
| [17] | 李莹飞, 耿玉清, 周红娟, 等. 基于不同方法测定土壤酸性磷酸酶活性的比较[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(1): 98-104. |
| [18] | 徐忠山, 杨彦明, 陈晓晶, 等. 菌肥对混播牧草土壤酶活性及微生物的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(6): 77-83. |
| [19] | 陈学军, 丁翔, 徐科宇. 木质素及其衍生物对土性能和机理的研究进展综述[J]. 土工基础, 2021, 35(2): 156-160. |
| [20] | 雷震远. 木质素对土壤改良以及小油菜生长的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2023. |
