全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Animal Feed Business Risk Assessment Quantification COVID-19 and Supply Chains Disruptions Losses

DOI: 10.4236/jmf.2024.143019, PP. 337-355

Keywords: Project Operation Efficiency, Dynamic Simulation Model, COVID-19, Supply Chain Disruption, Stochastic Efficiency with Respect to Function (SERF), Certainly Equivalent (CE), Risk Premiums (RP), Value at Risk (VaR)

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The animal feed business is facing the risk of raw material grain shortage due to global supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia and Ukraine conflict and recently global shipping disruption at the Red Sea. These situations cause high increases in raw material prices and animal feed cost of production. The feed mills business plant demand uncertainty and material shortage reduced plants’ production capacity to 36% - 46%. The bounce back in animal feed consumer demand leads to more stress on supply chains and business sustainability. This study identifies and quantifies business risk due to low sale revenue and test subsidy program proposed for rebuilding plant capacity affected and caused by supply chain disruption. The study applied stochastic budgeting simulation method to evaluate risk and uncertain factors and calculate NPV probability distribution under different feed mill plant capacities generated by supply chain disruption pressures. Different feed mill plant capacities calculated and ranked across various risk aversion levels. The potential loss of COVID-19 and supply chain disruption of animal feed business and food security sustainability and the need to return the supply chain system to normal situation has not been quantified in a robust manner. Therefore, the stochastic budgeting simulation model performed to incorporate risk variables and draw NPV probability distributions to quantify COVID-19 and supply chain disruption effect on feed mill business under various risk preferences. The Government raw materials incentive strategies were evaluated for different coronavirus levels and ranked across absolute risk aversion coefficient levels. The study shows that raw material subsidy for feed mill business plants will reduce the expected loss probability due to COVID-19 and supply chain disruption challenges and increase NPV return above RO 2.00 million by 71%. The SERF analysis calculated certainty equivalent (CE) and risk premiums (RP) value to payoff for COVID-19 and supply chain disruption.

References

[1]  MAFWR, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries and Water Resources (2022) Agriculture Statistic Report 2022.
[2]  Ishag, K.H.M. (2022) Broiler Farming Risk and Stress Management Strategies. Journal of Sustainable Development, 15, 112-125.
https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v15n4p112
[3]  Asare, A.O., Addo, P.C., Sarpong, E.O. and Kotei, D. (2020) COVID-19: Optimizing Business Performance through Agile Business Intelligence and Data Analytics. Open Journal of Business and Management, 8, 2071-2080.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2020.85126
[4]  Saleheen, F. and Habib, M.M. (2022) Global Supply Chain Disruption Management Post COVID-19. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12, 376-389.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2022.123021
[5]  Canwat, V. (2024) COVID-19-Related Supply Chain Disruptions: Resilience and Vulnerability of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. Cogent Business & Management, 11, Article ID: 2315691.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2315691
[6]  Giroud, A. and Ivarsson, I. (2020) World Investment Report 2020: International Production beyond the Pandemic: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva, and New York, 2020, 247 pp. ISBN: 978-9211129854. Journal of International Business Policy, 3, 465-468.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00078-2
[7]  Ivanov, D. (2020) Viable Supply Chain Model: Integrating Agility, Resilience and Sustainability Perspectives—Lessons from and Thinking beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic. Annals of Operations Research, 319, 1411-1431.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03640-6
[8]  Ivanov, D. and Dolgui, A. (2020) A Digital Supply Chain Twin for Managing the Disruption Risks and Resilience in the Era of Industry 4.0. Production Planning & Control, 32, 775-788.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1768450
[9]  Magableh, G.M. (2021) Supply Chains and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Framework. European Management Review, 18, 363-382.
https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12449
[10]  Hamid, S., and Mir, M.Y. (2021) Global Agri-Food Sector: Challenges and Opportunities in COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, Article ID: 647337.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.647337
[11]  Romana, F.A., Gestoso, C.G. and Gonzalez Fernandez, S. (2023) Global Supply Chains in the Post-Pandemic. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 13, 725-734.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2023.137039
[12]  Lalani, B., Lanza, G., Leiva, B., Mercado, L. and Haggar, J. (2024) Shade versus Intensification: Trade-Off or Synergy for Profitability in Coffee Agroforestry Systems? Agricultural Systems, 214, Article ID: 103814.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103814
[13]  Akiko, T. (2023) Optimizing Sustainable Farming Practices for Enhanced Rice Yield in the Mekong Delta: A Case Study of Palau. Journal Siplieria Sciences, 4, 15-24.
https://doi.org/10.48173/jss.v4i4.228
[14]  Fan, Y., Himanshu, S.K., Ale, S., DeLaune, P.B., Zhang, T., Park, S.C., et al. (2022) The Synergy between Water Conservation and Economic Profitability of Adopting Alternative Irrigation Systems for Cotton Production in the Texas High Plains. Agricultural Water Management, 262, Article ID: 107386.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107386
[15]  Hardaker, J.B. and Lien, G. (2010) Stochastic Efficiency Analysis with Risk Aversion Bounds: A Comment. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54, 379-383.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2010.00498.x
[16]  Meyer, J., Richardson, J.W. and Schumann, K.D. (2009) Stochastic Efficiency Analysis with Risk Aversion Bounds: A Correction. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 53, 521-525.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2009.00471.x
[17]  Hardaker, J.B., Richardson, J.W., Lien, G., and Schumann, K.D. (2004) Stochastic Efficiency Analysis with Risk Aversion Bounds: A Simplified Approach. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 48, 253-270.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2004.00239.x
[18]  Ishag, K. (2020) Economics of Dairy Cow Feed Management Strategies and Policy Analysis. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 13, 9-18.
[19]  Richardson, J.W., Schumann, K. and Feldman, P. (2008) Simetar©: Simulation and Econometrics to Analyze Risk. Simetar, Inc.
[20]  Khakbazan, M., Block, H.C., Huang, J., Colyn, J.J., Baron, V.S., Basarab, J.A., et al. (2022) Effects of Silage-Based Diets and Cattle Efficiency Type on Performance, Profitability, and Predicted CH4 Emission of Backgrounding Steers. Agriculture, 12, Article No. 277.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020277
[21]  Ishag, K. (2015) Risk Management Strategies of Desert Farming at Najed in Sultanate of Oman. Journal of Sustainable Development, 8, 1-13.
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/download/45142/24474
[22]  Blumenfeld, S., Lu, C., Christophersen, T. and Coates, D. (2009) Water, Wetlands and Forests. A Review of Ecological, Economic and Policy Linkages. CBD Technical Series No. 47. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity and Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands.
[23]  Carpenter, S.R., Brock, W. and Hanson, P. (1999) Ecological and Social Dynamics in Simple Models of Ecosystem Management. Conservation Ecology, 3, 4.
https://doi.org/10.5751/es-00122-030204
[24]  Chen, X., Lupi, F., He, G. and Liu, J. (2009) Linking Social Norms to Efficient Conservation Investment in Payments for Ecosystem Services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 11812-11817.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809980106
[25]  Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. and Walker, B. (2002) Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 31, 437-440.
https://doi.org/10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:rasdba]2.0.co;2
[26]  MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis. World Resources Institute (WRI).
[27]  Saunders, J.F. and Lewis, W.M. (2003) Implications of Climatic Variability for Regulatory Low Flows in the South Platte River Basin, Colorado. JAWRA: Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 39, 33-45.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb01559.x
[28]  Richardson, J.W., et al. (2006) Risk Assessment in Economic Feasibility Analysis: The Case of Ethanol Production in Texas. AFPC Research Report, Texas A&M University.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133