全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Evaluation of Air-Kerma and Absorbed Dose to Water for External Radiotherapy Beam Using Ionization Chamber

DOI: 10.4236/ojrad.2024.143012, PP. 113-124

Keywords: Absorbed Dose to Water, Air Kerma, Co-60 Source, Calibration, SSDL, Radiotherapy Beam, Metrology, Accuracy and Accuracy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Radiotherapy is the most widely applied oncologic treatment modality utilizing ionizing radiation. A high degree of accuracy, reliability and reproducibility is required for a successful treatment outcome. Measurement using ionization chamber is a prerequisite for absorbed dose determination for external beam radiotherapy. Calibration coefficient is expressed in terms of air kerma and absorbed dose to water traceable to Secondary Standards Dosimetry Laboratory. The objective of this work was to evaluate the level of accuracy of ionization chamber used for clinical radiotherapy beam determination. Measurement and accuracy determination were carried out according to IAEA TRS 398 protocol. Clinical farmers type ionization chamber measurement and National Reference standard from Secondary Standards Dosimetry Laboratory were both exposed to cobalt-60 beam and measurement results compared under the same environmental conditions. The accuracy level between National Reference Standard and clinical radiotherapy standard was found to be ?1.92% and ?2.02% for air kerma and absorbed dose to water respectively. To minimize the effect of error and maximize therapeutic dose during treatment in order to achieve required clinical outcome, calibration factor was determined for air kerma (Nk) as 49.7 mGy/nC and absorbed dose to water ND, as 52.9 mGy/nC. The study established that radiotherapy beam measurement chain is prone to errors. Hence there is a need to independently verify the accuracy of radiation dose to ensure precision of dose delivery. The errors must be accounted for during clinical planning by factoring in calibration factor to minimize the systematic errors during treatment, and thereby providing enough room to achieve ±5% dose delivery to tumor target as recommended by ICRU.

References

[1]  Ndonye, P.K. and Tagoe, S.N.A. (2022) Current Status of Radiotherapy Services in Kenya. Journal of Cancer Therapy, 13, 218-233.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2022.134018
[2]  International Atomic Energy Agency (2005) Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students. IAEA.
[3]  Thwaites, D. (2010) The Significance and Impact of Dosimetry Audits in Radiotherapy. SSDL Newsletter No. 58, IAEA.
[4]  SSDL Newsletter, No. 70, June 2019, Prepared by the Joint IAEA/WHO Secretariat of the Network of Secondary Standards Dosimetry Laboratories.
https://ssdl.iaea.org
[5]  Greener, T. and Byrne, J. (2012) Radiation Dosimetry. In: Sibtain, A., Morgan, A. and MacDougall, N., Eds., Physics for Clinical Oncology, Oxford University Press, 66-85.
https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199573356.003.0062
[6]  Minniti, R., Shobe, J., Seltzer, S., Chen-Mayer, H. and Domen, S. (2006), Absorbed Dose to Water Calibration of Ionization Chambers in a 60Co Gamma-Ray Beam. Special Publication (NIST SP), National Institute of Standards and Technology.
https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=841189
[7]  AAPM TG-21 (1983) A Protocol for the Determination of Absorbed Dose from High-Energy Photon and Electron Beams. Medical Physics, 10, 741-771.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595446
[8]  International Atomic Energy Agency (2000) Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry Based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water. IAEA TRS-398, IAEA.
[9]  Reza, M.A., Islam, M.R., Rahman, M.S., Shamsuzzaman, M., Rahman, M.R. and Khan, H.R. (2018) Calibration of Therapy Level Ionization Chamber at 60Co Teletherapy Beam Used for Radiation Therapy. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, 79, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.56431/p-qf8n24
[10]  Followill, D.S. (2019) The Radiological Physics Center and Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston QA Center’s 50 Years of Vigilance and Quality Assurance for the Radiation Oncology Community Worldwide, This Issue. SSDL Newsletter, No. 70, 5-9.
[11]  IAEA TRS 398 (2006) Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry Based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water.
[12]  Solimanian, A. and Ghafoori, M. (2010) Standard Calibration of Ionization Chambers Used in Radiation Therapy Dosimetry and Evaluation of Uncertainties. International Journal of Radiation Research, 8, 195-199.
[13]  International Atomic Energy Agency (2007) Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology: International Code of Practice. Technical Report Series No. 457, IAEA.
[14]  Safwan Ahmad Fadzil, M., Mohd Noor, N., Ngie Min, U., Abdullah, N., Taufik Dolah, M., Pawanchek, M., et al. (2022) Dosimetry Audit for Megavoltage Photon Beams Applied in Non-Reference Conditions. Physica Medica, 100, 99-104.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.06.011
[15]  International Atomic Energy Agency (1997) Absorbed Dose Determination in Photon and Electron Beams: An International Code of Practice. Technical Report Series No. 277, IAEA.
[16]  Castro, P., García-Vicente, F., Mínguez, C., et al. (2008) Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Departamento de Radiofísica. Hospital Universitario “La Princesa”.
[17]  International Atomic Energy Agency (2009) Calibration of Reference Dosimeters for External Beam Radiotherapy. Technical Report Series No. 469, IAEA.
[18]  International Atomic Energy Agency (2008) Measurement Uncertainty: A Practical Guide for Secondary Standards Dosimetry Laboratories. TECDOC-1585, IAEA.

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133