全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

长沙走马楼三国吴简税账所见孙吴税制与小农经济的关系
The Relationship between the Tax System of Sun Wu and the Small-Scale Farming Economy as Revealed by the Tax Accounts from the Wu Bamboo Slips of the Three Kingdoms Period Found at the Zoumalou in Changsha

DOI: 10.12677/ojhs.2024.124042, PP. 272-281

Keywords: 走马楼三国吴简,孙吴,税收史,小农经济
Zoumalou Bamboo Slips of the Three Kingdoms
, Sunwu State, The History of Tax, The Small-Scale Peasant Economy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

三国孙吴时期,是典型的封建小农经济形式,耕织结合,农民自给自足,土地是主要的生产资料。通过分析长沙走马楼三国吴简税账发现,田税、米税、布税及人口税是孙吴赋税的主要形式。孙吴税赋政策符合封建社会小农经济的特点,国家实行重农政策和扶助小农的政策,保护赋税之源和维持封建统治的稳定,从小农生产结构中获取资源和利益;另一方面,繁重的税赋和刺激人口的政策导致人口过快增长,对小农经济产生了一定的消极作用。
In the Sun Wu period of the Three Kingdoms, it exemplified a typical feudal small peasant economy characterized by an amalgamation of agriculture and weaving. Farmers were self-sufficient, with land serving as the primary means of production. By scrutinizing the tax records on bamboo slips from Zumalou, Changsha during the Three Kingdoms era, it becomes apparent that taxes on fields, rice, cloth, and population constituted the principal forms of taxation in Sun Wu. Sun Wu’s tax policy aligned with the attributes of a small-scale peasant economy within feudal society. The state implemented policies emphasizing agriculture and supporting small-scale peasants to safeguard their source of taxation while maintaining stability in feudal rule and reaping resources and benefits from the production structure of these peasants. Conversely, burdensome taxes coupled with population-stimulating measures resulted in excessive population growth which exerted certain adverse effects on the small peasant economy.

References

[1]  叶茂, 兰鸥, 柯文武. 封建地主制下的小农经济——传统农业与小农经济研究述评(下) [J]. 中国经济史研究, 1993(3): 123-143.
[2]  长沙走马楼三国吴简∙嘉禾吏民田家莂[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1997.
[3]  长沙走马楼三国吴简∙竹简(壹~玖) [M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2020.
[4]  林甘泉. 中国经济通史∙秦汉经济卷下[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2003: 503.
[5]  何立民. 湖南长沙走马楼三国吴简研究的回顾与反思[J]. 江汉考古, 2009(2): 119-139.
[6]  高敏. 论《吏民田家莂》的契约与凭证二重性及其意义——读长沙走马楼简牍札记之二[J]. 郑州大学学报(社会科学版), 2000(4): 67-70.
[7]  蒋福亚. 《吏民田家莂》的组合形式[J]. 中国经济史研究, 2008(1): 161-169.
[8]  朱德贵. 长沙走马楼吴简商业税献疑[J]. 商业研究, 2008(12): 192-194.
[9]  王素. 吴简所见“调”应是“户调” [J]. 历史研究, 2001(4): 167-168.
[10]  于振波. 从走马楼吴简看其时长沙民户的贫富差别[J]. 史学月刊, 2008(6): 90-93.
[11]  王子今. 论走马楼简所见“小妻”——兼说两汉三国社会的多妻现象[J]. 学术月刊, 2004(10): 79-84.
[12]  陈寿. 三国志, 吴主传[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1959: 1142.

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133