全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于GC-MS对织物洗涤剂除汗味效果评价研究
Study on the Evaluation of Sweat Removing Effect of Fabric Detergent Based on GC-MS

DOI: 10.12677/amc.2024.124021, PP. 165-172

Keywords: 除汗味效果,织物洗涤剂,异戊酸,GC-MS,衍生化
Sweat Removal Effect
, Fabric Detergent, Isovaleric Acid, GC-MS, Derivatization

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

建立了基于GC-MS对织物洗涤剂除汗味效果评价方法。样品中汗味特征物质异戊酸经衍生试剂衍生,乙酸乙酯作为内标物,采用气相色谱质谱联用仪对异戊酸含量进行测定。结果表明,样品中异戊酸在浓度范围5~200 μg内线性良好,相关系数可达0.99970,线性方程为:y = 0.122x + 0.055。对空白样品进行3个浓度水平的加标回收实验,回收率在91.2%~109.1%,相对偏差(n = 6)在3.38%~3.97%,当称样量为1 g,检出限可达0.0001%,定量限可达0.0003%。实验采用建立的方法对10个典型样品进行检测,有4款的汗味去除效果相当于或低于标准洗涤剂的去除效果,有6款优于标准洗涤剂的汗味去除效果。结果表明,该方法适用于对织物洗涤剂除汗味效果评价。
A method based on GC-MS was developed to evaluate the deodorization effect of fabric detergents. Isopentric acid, the characteristic substance of sweat taste in the sample, was derivatized by derivatization reagent, and ethyl acetate was used as an internal standard. The content of isopentric acid was determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The results showed that the linearity of isovalerate in the range of 5~200 μg was good, and the correlation coefficient was 0.99970. The linear equation was y = 0.122 x + 0.055. The recovery rate of the blank samples was 91.2%~109.1%, and the relative deviation (N = 6) was 3.38%~3.97%. When the sample size was 1 g, the detection limit was 0.0001% and the quantitative limit was 0.0003%. The established method was used to detect 10 typical samples, 4 of which were equal to or lower than the standard detergent, 6 of which were better than the standard detergent. The results show that the method is suitable for evaluating the deodorization effect of fabric detergents.

References

[1]  蔡王丹, 范硕, 田伟, 李艳清, 祝成炎, 张红霞. 纺织品异味及除异味技术研究现状及进展[J]. 丝绸, 2023, 60(3): 82-89.
[2]  Abney, S.E., Ijaz, M.K., McKinney, J. and Gerba, C.P. (2021) Laundry Hygiene and Odor Control: State of the Science. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 87, e03002-20.
https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.03002-20
[3]  Leyden, J.J., McGinley, K.J., Hölzle, E., Labows, J.N. and Kligman, A.M. (1981) The Microbiology of the Human Axilla and Its Relationship to Axillary Odor. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 77, 413-416.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12494624
[4]  肖红, 施楣梧, 刘丽丽. 抗菌防臭纺织品相关的基础性问题[J]. 纺织学报, 2010, 31(9): 147-152.
[5]  Adams, B.B. (2002) Dermatologic Disorders of the Athlete. Sports Medicine, 32, 309-321.
https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200232050-00003
[6]  Kanda, F., Yagi, E., Fukuda, M., Nakajima, K., Ohta, T. and Nakata, O. (1990) Elucidation of Chemical Compounds Responsible for Foot Malodour. British Journal of Dermatology, 122, 771-776.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1990.tb06265.x
[7]  刘莉, 程会英. 纺织品异味检测存在的问题及建议[J]. 中国纤检, 2011(18): 64-65.
[8]  吉荣康城. 臭气(恶臭)的测定与气味传感器[J]. 环境保护科学, 2007, 33(4): 70-73.
[9]  龙成生, 陈然然, 宋珍华, 吴德华. 基于搅拌棒吸附萃取的人体气味分析[C]//中国化学会第22届全国色谱学术报告会及仪器展览会论文集(第二卷). 北京: 中国化学会, 2019: 2.
[10]  陈然然, 吴德华, 王辛, 龙成生. 气相色谱-质谱法在人体气味分析中的应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2019, 37(1): 54-62.
[11]  代勇, 王彦吉, 孟品佳. 顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱法及模式识别法鉴别群体手部气味[J]. 理化检验(化学分册), 2009, 45(8): 893-897.
[12]  吴德华, 徐汉坤, 王正萍, 等. 人体腋窝气味的固相微萃取GC-MS分析[J]. 分析测试学报, 2003, 22(4): 21-24.
[13]  刘文洁, 赵建湘, 代光剑, 等. 电子鼻与嗅辨法在异味测评中的复合运用研究[C]//中国家用电器协会. 2019年中国家用电器技术大会论文集. 佛山: 《电器》杂志社, 2019: 1217-1221.
[14]  Curran, A.M., Ramirez, C.F., Schoon, A.A. and Furton, K.G. (2007) The Frequency of Occurrence and Discriminatory Power of Compounds Found in Human Scent across a Population Determined by SPME-GC/MS. Journal of Chromatography B, 846, 86-97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.08.039
[15]  Mochalski, P., King, J., Unterkofler, K., Hinterhuber, H. and Amann, A. (2014) Emission Rates of Selected Volatile Organic Compounds from Skin of Healthy Volunteers. Journal of Chromatography B, 959, 62-70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.04.006

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133