Errores en la estrategia argumentativa de la interpretación providencialista de la mano invisible de adam smith: el caso de la teoría de los sentimientos morales

in general, those who support the providentialist interpretation of adam smith's invisible hand hold that those individuals lead by an invisible hand have certain qualities that are expected to reach certain beneficial ends for society. this would be, neither more nor less, the sense of the famous smithean expression. in this paper, i will show, on the contrary, that in the invisible hand passage in the theory of moral sentiments those lead by an invisible hand do not have the qualities that are expected to reach the beneficial ends. so, the providentialist interpretation cannot explain how the qualities of the landlords (those lead by an invisible hand) can reach the beneficial ends (the distribution of the necessary goods for life).