全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

?Qué indicadores son considerados por enfermería para conseguir una diálisis perfecta en el paciente en hemodiafiltración en línea?

DOI: 10.4321/S2254-28842012000200006

Keywords: on-line haemodiafiltration, suitability, indicators.

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

both the guides and the instructions of the spanish nephrology society's quality management group offer a series of indicators for measuring quality in the provision of haemodialysis. the aim of this study was, after identifying the main indicators of optimal dialysis in the view of nurses, to assess each dialysis session objectively, in the conviction that knowing what went right and wrong in each session would give us proposals for improvement, earlier than with the indicators in common use. to this end, a survey was conducted among nursing staff (n=26) asking them to list the 10 parameters they considered fundamental to a successful dialysis session. the 10 most-cited items were used to draw up the data gathering sheet, with yes/no responses. for each patient (n=160) 3 consecutive sessions were assessed (n=480 sessions), involving the same treatment pattern. the nurse conducting the sessions was unaware which sessions were to be assessed, nor did they know the identity of a second assessing nurse, whose job would be to mark each of the items yes or no. 1 point was given for each objective achieved. the maximum score for each patient was 30 points (10 per session), except in those with tunnelled catheters, for whom it was 27 points (10 per session), as haemostasis is not assessed. the result was that 41.3% of the sessions conducted got the top score (42.1% with arteriovenous fistula and 35.1% with tunnelled catheter, p=0.043). the percentage score was 88.7 ± 11.9%, the percentage being significantly higher with avf than with a catheter (89.9 ± 9.9 versus 79.7 ± 19.4, p<0.001). no differences by sex, age, aetiology or length of admission were detected. 30 patients (18.8%) got the maximum score in all three sessions. el 77.7% of patients (124) scored over 85%, and 87.1% of patients over 80%. in barely 42.5% was there a full recovery of the clean circuit in all three sessions (60.5% of the sessions). 50 patients (31.2%) displayed symptoms during dialysis in at least

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413