Use of camera-traps in natural trails and shelters for the mammalian survey in the Atlantic Forest

in order to evaluate the efficiency of different mammalian survey methods, we compared traditional sampling techniques (use of camera-traps on roads and artificial trails, track censuses, and direct field visualization) with an alternative sampling design (camera-traps positioned in natural areas such as natural trails and shelters). we conducted the study in a deciduous atlantic-forest park in southern brazil, and additionally compared our results with a previous intensive study carried out in the same area. our considerably smaller sampling effort (example: 336 trap.day for our camera-traps versus 2,154 trap.day for the earlier study) registered the presence of 85% of the local known species, with camera-traps being 68% efficient. moreover, shelter camera-traps revealed a different species composition regarding most of other sampling methods. this sampling strategy involving natural forest sites was therefore able to effectively optimize the chances of evaluating species composition in a shorter period, especially with respect to lower-density and cryptic species, as well as to detect species that avoid open, disturbed sites such as roads and man-made forest trails.