全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Conflicting genomes, the demic theory & biodiversity

DOI: 10.1590/S0100-84551997000100022

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

organismic-centered darwinism, in order to use direct phenotypes to measure natural selection's effect, necessitates genome's harmony and uniform coherence plus large population sizes. however, modern gene-centered darwinism has found new interpretations to data that speak of genomic incoherence and disharmony. as a result of these two conflicting positions a conceptual crisis in biology has arisen. my position is that the presence of small, even pocket-size, demes is instrumental in generating divergence and phenotypic crisis. moreover, the presence of parasitic genomes as in acanthocephalan worms, which even manipulate suicidal behavior in their hosts; segregation distorters that change meiosis and mendelian ratios; selfish genes and selfish whole chromosomes, such as the case of b-chromosomes in grasshoppers; p-elements in drosophila; driving y-chromosomes that manipulate sex ratios making males more frequent, as in hamilton's x-linked drive; male strategists and outlaw genes, are eloquent examples of the presence of real conflicting genomes and of a non-uniform phenotypic coherence and genome harmony. thus, we are proposing that overall incoherence and disharmony generate disorder but also more biodiversity and creativeness. finally, if genes can manipulate natural selection, they can multiply mutations or undesirable characteristics and even lethal or detrimental ones, hence the accumulation of genetic loads. outlaw genes can change what is adaptively convenient even in the direction of the trait that is away from the optimum. the optimum can be "negotiated" among the variants, not only because pleiotropic effects demand it, but also, in some cases, because selfish, outlaw, p-elements or extended phenotypic manipulation require it. with organismic darwinism the genome in the population and in the individual was thought to act harmoniously without conflicts, and genotypes were thought to march towards greater adaptability. modern darwinism has a gene-centered vi

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413