O TEXTO PRESCRITIVO COMO PRODUTO DA ATIVIDADE DE LINGUAGEM: ANáLISE DOS TIPOS DE AGIR E DOS TIPOS DE DISCURSO NA RESOLU O No 36/98

We believe that the prescriptive text, as stated, is the product of the interaction of two or more individuals in a socially defined space and therefore, the word is a vehicle of communication and representation that is toward a real interlocutor, and may vary by established order in the interaction with reference to the social group. In this paper, we investigate the types of action and the types of discourses manifested in the text of Resolution No. 36/98-PRG/UFPB, and what role language plays in this context. To do so, we anchor ourselves, basically, on the theoretical and methodological Discursive Social Interactionism with Bronckart (1999) and, at times, which were needed in dialogue with other theories, such as Ergology, in the manner of Souza-e-Silva (2008) and with Dialogism in Bakhtin (1992) and Brait (1997). The institutionalized language in our case represents the manifestation of individuals with a view to a relativization of ethical training. Preliminarily, we can say that by the mention, even in text-prescriptive, the speaker, through language, give himself and their potential recipients, a strategic significance in his say, marking an institutional position in the speech and a relationship with knowledge.